Previous post
Nothing says mid-term panic when warmed-over leftovers like “feminist” Jessica Valenti wanting to promote killing babies because mommy can’t afford diapers.
Twenty-two years ago, Mx. Jessica co-founded the late and unlamented Feministing and her obsession with abortion — pro-abortion with no restrictions on age of mom or age of baby in the womb — became immediately apparent. Indeed, Valenti, as recently as her 2024 book, reiterates her position that abortion is a “moral good” and she rejects the old pro-choice position that abortion should be “safe, legal and rare.”
I mean, the old gal has a whole Substack site entitled Abortion, Every Day in case you missed out on what she considers the most valuable thing you could ever do — Kill The Unborn.
But since this message isn’t getting enough traction in political arena, Mx. Jessica wants Democrats to pivot on the narrative that centered abortion in the social issues realm. Her new schtick is that killing unborn babies is a matter of affordability.
They have looked at the last several election cycles, noticed that hammering voters over what they call “reproductive rights” didn’t deliver the blue wave they expected, and concluded that the problem was messaging — not the killing of the babies!
Oh, yeah, this is the perfect kitchen table issue … Joe and Sue sitting down at the kitchen table for dinner with little Chloe to talk about how they’ll be unable to take that Disney cruise with Chloe unless they decide to scrap 19-week-gestation-old little bro …
Was that too flip? Well, Jessica is fast to talk about “forced pregnancy”, “massive medical debt”, and losing an organ cuz pregnancy is the worst thing that can happen to a woman! RHEEEE! However, something like 95+% abortions are done within the first 12 weeks and by healthy women aborting healthy unborn babies for convenience. Jessica wishes to focus on the small number of medical issues because it makes for good press when many pro-life people actually struggle with the hard cases. And as the saying goes, hard cases make for bad law.
Jessica would have bad law that there be absolutely no restriction on abortion. None. She’s even willing to talk about her own abortion at 28 y/o and how it led to the wonderful life she currently lives — hubby, daughter, no financial worries. She maintains that none of it would have happened without the killing of an unborn child.
Jessica is probably right about a different future. So what? All individual decisions in life affect our futures. We can all look back at things we’ve done — jobs taken, colleges chosen — and know if we made a different decision, met different people, our lives would look quite different. A 28 y/o Jessica had no clue what her future would be when she showed up for the abortion. The only certainty was that particular child that existed at that particular moment would no long have any future of his or her own.
Abortion is SELFish.
Art by @GPrime85 https://t.co/aJ0RqLjoCD
— Ruth (@redusa21) July 7, 2025
Jessica loves to lecture about bodily autonomy, but she never gave her own unborn child his/her own. Mx. Cosseted Leftist is really not a deep thinker at all. Pretty sad she’s gotten to 47 years of age and is still at the emotional level of a uncivilized toddler.
This is exactly who you vote for when voting for Democrats.
featured image original graphic by Darleen Click
Once the mind is tricked into arbitrarily agreeing that killing an unborn child is the moral thing to do,it is insane.That’s why we see all the distorted reality they profess is true,they are crazy,incapable of living themselves without punishing others with death to feed their wicked quest.
1 Comment