Previous post
Yes, I know, we are ready for all the drama around Brett Kavanaugh to end. If we are tired of the baseless accusations and media idiocy, how do you think the Kavanaugh family feels? But it will continue until a vote is held. It will continue until we get answers. Such as the new question Senator Grassley posed to Ford’s attorneys today. Did Christine Blasey Ford coach friends on how to pass a polygraph?
This latest revelation from an ex-boyfriend who dated Ford for six years throws major doubt on her claim.
BREAKING: Fox’s @johnrobertsFox obtains letter from Ford ex-boyfriend alleging: dated for 6 yrs, never told of sex assault, Ford coached friend on taking polygraph, flew frequently w/o expressing any fear of flying/tight spaces/limited exits. Doesn’t want to b/c “involved”. pic.twitter.com/jVeW0qaJD0
— Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) October 3, 2018
And…
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1047298692607352832
Keep in mind, Ford testified UNDER OATH that she had never coached anyone nor lied about polygraph tests. Via our friends at Legal Insurrection, here is the relevant quote during her testimony:
MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?
FORD: Never.
MITCHELL: And I don’t just mean countermeasures, but I mean just any sort of tips, or anything like that.
FORD: No. I was scared of the test itself, but was comfortable that I could tell the information, and the test would reveal whatever it was going to reveal. I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a little bit stressful.
MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?
FORD: Never.
Oh. Oh really? Then why would your ex-boyfriend of six years claim otherwise?
.@ChuckGrassley: “@SenJudiciary has received a sworn statement from a boyfriend of Dr. Ford’s stating he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coach a friend on a polygraph. When asked under oath if she’d ever given tips to someone planning on taking a polygraph, Dr. Ford said, ‘Never.’” pic.twitter.com/RBJwFE4VI8
— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) October 3, 2018
But hey, she volunteered for the polygraph!!
Wait WUT? I missed that last week. She found the polygraph extremely stressful and felt that she’d volunteered her whole life to the test? Folks, she answers exactly TWO FREAKING QUESTIONS!! Not only that, but she claimed she didn’t understand how polygraphs work!
But again, here’s the bigger picture to concentrate on. No matter what her attorneys say, and no matter their temper tantrum throwing about how the FBI isn’t talking to Ford, they have a client with serious problems.
The second exit door in their home? Had exactly ZERO to do with the 2012 marital counseling session
“The door was not an escape route but an entrance route,” said an attorney familiar with the ongoing congressional investigation. “It appears the real plan for the second front door was to rent out a separate room.”
-Snip
Palo Alto city records show that a building permit for an additional room and exterior door was issued to Ford and her husband on Feb. 4, 2008 — more than four years before the May 2012 therapy session where, she says, she first identified Kavanaugh as her attacker.
All the remodeling, including a new bathroom, was completed by February 2010. The only additional permits issued to Ford at her Palo Alto address are for “solar panels” on the roof, a “solar hot water system” in the garage, and an “electric vehicle charge station” for the driveway — all of which were issued after 2012. [Emphasis Added]
All of which definitely explains Ford’s remarks she made while UNDER OATH about hosting other folks including Google interns. She didn’t need a second entrance because of trauma, it was a rental unit in their home! Not only that, but their second home on the beach, no additional exit doors necessary!
There is a therapist/marriage counselor who is now scrambling to salvage her reputation because she made the mistake of renting a business space from the Ford family all those years ago.
So, its looking like she lied about the exit door thing. But now, given additional sworn under oath information, she lied about the Oh So Stressful polygraph test that she had to endure??!!
Look, we pointed out the discrepancies of Ford’s testimony that were caught on that day. We’ve also pointed out that there is more going on behind the scenes than we know. However, the more information that comes to light, the more questions as to Christine Blasey Ford’s credibility we have.
This latest information regarding the not needed 2nd entrance door and the polygraph test coaching shed serious doubt on the veracity of Ford’s claims. She lied about two crucial pieces of information under oath. What else did she lie about?
Feature Photo Credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
scott says: Hopefully the FBI is keeping a close eye on these revelations, and that’s why they’re saving her for last to interview, so they have all this lined up.
If there is any justice in the Justice Department, they will prosecute each and every one of these cases of lying under oath, instead of letting them pull this on Judge Kavanaugh with impunity
GWB says: They honestly don’t need to interview her at all. She’s given hours of testimony and submitted sworn written statements. Giving her the chance to shift the goalposts again before indicting her is a bad call, imo.
GWB says: I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be
Huh?!? They only asked 2 questions!
According to the statement from the guy who administered it, they didn’t even ask the baseline questions. (Was he incompetent or lying?)
I wanted to believe that Ford had actually suffered something in the early 80s. But there’s just too much flake in her stories, now. (BTW, I *never* believed the ‘second exit’ and ‘fear of flying’ bits because those speak to a woman deeply troubled, to the point of likely needing large doses of medication to get through her day. Not the sort of person who lives as normally as she evidently does – for California values of ‘normal’.)
scott says: “According to the statement from the guy who administered it, they didn’t even ask the baseline questions. (Was he incompetent or lying?)”
I’d propose neither GWB, he was hired to perform a showboating polygraph, who’s only purpose was to be used as a club to beat her critics over the head. Asking baseline questions is what gives a polygraph what little credibility it has. Without them, there is no basis on which to judge the other responses, which in this case, would most likely have shown how full of BS she is, so they omitted them.
Andrew X says: What else? How about that fear of flying?
(Although I grant that may have been said by her lawyers and not her per se. Does the event of lawyers lying to the Committee about the status of their client constitute a crime? Dunno….)
SFC D says: So when can we expect perjury charges to be filed? And no, it’s not victim shaming, she’s not a victim of anything other than liberal democrat grandstanding, she’s nothing but a prop. Everyone realizes that but her.
[…] strangers too horrible if it serves the goal of goals. E. Jean, like that pitiable creature Christine Blasey Ford, regrets that she has only one life to give for her […]
7 Comments