Trump's Hail Mary Bid
Previous post

Transgender Soldiers Impede Battle Readiness

Transgender Soldiers Impede Battle Readiness

Transgender Soldiers Impede Battle Readiness

The House narrowly passed the defense bill today with many provisions hotly contested by the Democrats. One such provision involves funding for transgender surgeries.

According to Democrats, not funding transgender surgeries for soldiers is bigoted, divisive, and discriminatory. The military is supposed to be diverse and inclusive

Throughout the process, partisan anger transformed the chamber of America’s democracy into a battleground in the country’s increasingly polarizing culture wars. Republicans accused Democrats of “idiocy” and “weakening” the nation’s armed forces with policies promoting diversity and protection of LGBTQ rights. Democrats called their Republican colleagues “racist” and “bigoted.”

According to some, the military has just been swept into this fray against their will. 

Turning the must-pass defense bill into a partisan battleground shows how deeply the nation’s military has been unexpectedly swept up in disputes over race, equity and women’s healthcare that are driving the Republican Party’s priorities in America’s widening national divide.

During one particularly tense moment in the debate, Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio, a former chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, spoke of how difficult it was to look across the aisle as Republicans chip away at gains for women, Black people and others in the military.

OH REALLY? The push for DEI has been insidiously making its way through our military for years now. YEARS. Instead of ensuring all our soldiers are battle ready, we’ve been dealing with the kinder, gentler military who refuses to hold our soldiers to high standards.

The issue of transgenders in the military speaks directly to our capabilities to have our soldiers battle ready on a moment’s notice. And it’s an issue that’s been brewing for quite some time. This is from 2017.

Yet today, the whole of the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mantra is so important that the military will put that ABOVE our actual battle readiness.

Agreed. In regards to transgenders and battle readiness, they won’t be. For a multitude of reasons, some of which are articulated here. 

Watch it all. They are correct. The needs to the nation HAVE to usurp the needs and wants of the individual. The dollar costs as well as the physical and mental costs of shepherding a soldier through a gender transition takes away resources and military capabilities. And right now we need everyone to be battle ready for a multitude of reasons. Much of which was clearly articulated above. 

However, there’s another reason why transgenders aren’t fit for military duty. Their physical fitness. The military has been battling the issues of physical fitness for several years now. Yet lowering standards to “help” everyone achieve hasn’t helped. Yet, when there’s a proposal to go back to the old Army fitness test, members of the military claim soldiers will fail it. Gee, I wonder why? Maybe because they aren’t requiring PT on a regular basis?

As for transgenders in the military, physical fitness exemptions are the norm. In fact, they can apply for a physical fitness exemption every six months. Given the current DEI climate throughout the military as well as our government, does anyone think a transgender soldier’s commanding officer is going to say no? Not right now they aren’t. 

Which again points directly to the issue of battle readiness. This link gives a pretty good idea as to what physical conditions would render a soldier non-deployable thus impeding battle readiness of the group. Reading through it, those undergoing gender transitions fit into several of the slots listed.

For our military, the needs of the nation MUST ALWAYS take precedence over individual choices, thus our military shouldn’t be funding transgender surgeries. Our military has been a social experiment for too many years now. It needs to STOP.

Feature Photo Credit: Soldiers, helicopter via iStock, cropped and modified

Written by

7 Comments
  • Cameron says:

    I remember the very instant the ban on gays was lifted, the screeching of “what about transgenders?!” was heard.

    So glad I got out before the rot spread that badly.

  • […] to Norfolk, VA, some residents not happy Transterrestrial Musings: Public Schools Victory Girls: Transgender Soldiers Impede Battle Readiness Volokh Conspiracy: Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions Watts Up With That: […]

  • Maureen says:

    More to the point, no one who is dependent on a drug, insulin, hormones, etc, should be allowed into a combat zone . There is no guarantee that those drugs can be accessed during a combat mission.

    • SFC D says:

      There are as many medical reasons to make a service member non-deployable as there are service members. Availability of medication is a big one. I served 24 years, retired when the doc said no more deployments due to deteriorated discs. There’s no room in the military for non-deployables. Not everyone has to deploy, but everyone must be able to.

  • NTSOG says:

    “According to Democrats, not funding transgender surgeries for soldiers is bigoted, divisive, and discriminatory.”

    So service in the military is to become a form of Federal medical insurance funded from the military budget to pay medical expenses of people who are actually mentally disturbed?

  • Scott says:

    “So service in the military is to become a form of Federal medical insurance funded from the military budget to pay medical expenses of people who are actually mentally disturbed democrats?”… FIFY

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead