The Problem With Indulging Stupidity

The Problem With Indulging Stupidity

The Problem With Indulging Stupidity

Gender dysphoria is a disorder – a condition that is different from the gender nonconformity stupidity which which we have been inundated during the 2010s and which we have been indulging, because genuflecting at the altar of the weird makes snowflakes feel special and unique.

And dog forbid we EVER not make anyone feel special and unique!

“Gender nonconformity” refers to behaviors not matching the gender norms or stereotypes of the gender assigned at birth. It is not a mental disorder, and it is not an illness, but some medical professionals – afraid of exposing people to life’s challenges and stresses – are encouraging society to encourage people to “be themselves” without making them feel uncomfortable by trying to force them to conform to society’s views of what they should be.

In our reactionary society, the commonsense advice of treating people fairly and kindly, no matter what they look like or how they dress, has become a way of indulging their utter stupidity and making excuses for criminal activity.

Instead of reacting positively to individual traits, such as talent, character, or intelligence, we are forced by the social justice zealots into indulging new “genders,” new “identities,” and any “uniqueness” that allows attention whores to force others to appreciate and respect them without doing anything to earn said respect.

Enter this sack of fetid yak droppings.

A convicted sex offender who says he identifies as an eight-year-old girl will spend at least a decade in prison for dozens of images of child pornography found on his home computer.

Joseph Gobrick, 45, claims the images were computer-animated and protected under the First Amendment.

“I’ve always been an 8-year-old girl,’’ Gobrick said at sentencing. “And even my drawings and fantasies, I am always an 8-year-old girl.’’

Funny, but when my kids were 8 years old, they never fantasized about raping infants. Just what kind of an 8 year-old girl has those kinds of fantasies?

Picture collage by Marta Hernandez

Worse yet, this shitbag tried to play victim by comparing his 10-20 year sentence to the Holocaust, telling the judge, “Under the law, Auschwitz was legal. What you’re doing here is wrong, just as Auschwitz was.’’

Anyone else want to feed this fuckbag into a woodchipper feet first, instead of indulging his psychosis?

This is the logical, absurd conclusion of indulging the stupidity of “nonconformity.” By bowing at the altar of political correctness, we are indulging those who “identify” as a salad fork on alternate Tuesdays by giving them the status of unique and special. And of course, because not everyone identifies as a salad fork, these individuals are “victimized and abused” for being “different.”

And because they’re “victims” of mean people who don’t identify as a salad fork, they must receive special treatment.

The weirder, the better.

No, I am not saying that boys and girls who dress differently or who dress in a more masculine or feminine manner than what society dictates should be abused, ridiculed, or compared to pedophiles. What I am saying is that when we begin indulging every stupid, nonsensical “self-identification,” where do we stop?

Today, a kid may demand attention and respect by self-identifying as a toaster. Tomorrow, a child-abusing pervert will demand to be incarcerated in a juvenile facility for females, because even though he is a 40-something creep, viewing the rape of infants on his computer, he’s special and unique because he identifies as something else than what he really is, and therefore, we should be indulging his proclivities, because he’s a victim.

And guess what, if Elizabeth Warren is elected President, he will get his way.

“I will direct the Bureau of Prisons to end the Trump Administration’s dangerous policy of imprisoning transgender people in facilities based on their sex assigned at birth and ensure that all facilities meet the needs of transgender people,” she writes on her campaign website, “including by providing medically necessary care, like transition-related surgeries, while incarcerated.”

This is a big problem with deifying victimhood. We are being forced to feel sorry for the “victims” of a callous world filled with those who just don’t understand the uniqueness of those who identify as a bowl of spaghetti every so often and compensate them for their pain and suffering by ignoring their crazy, and politicians eager to pander to these unhinged malcontents are vying for the opportunity to use our tax dollars to indulge their weird, creepy, and sometimes dangerous pursuits.

No, we shouldn’t be cruel to a girl who likes to wear her hair short and sports jeans and work boots rather than pretty shoes in high school.

But we also shouldn’t be indulging the weirdness of agitators, who demand attention, respect, and consideration, not based on their positive attributes, but rather because they’re weird and nonconforming. We shouldn’t worship the bizarre and outlandish. We shouldn’t use taxpayer dollars to show the freaks just how much we appreciate them.

Not worshiping at the altar of the ludicrous doesn’t make us comparable to Nazis. But it does, thankfully (for now) keep dangerous predators in prison where they belong.

Welcome Instapundit readers!

Featured image courtesy of Pixabay; cropped; Pixabay License free for commercial use.

Written by

Marta Hernandez is an immigrant, writer, editor, science fiction fan (especially military sci-fi), and a lover of freedom, her children, her husband and her pets. She loves to shoot, and range time is sacred, as is her hiking obsession, especially if we’re talking the European Alps. She is an avid caffeine and TWD addict, and wants to own otters, sloths, wallabies, koalas, and wombats when she grows up.

  • wjamyers says:

    “gender assigned at birth.” – You’ve already adopted their language.

    • Marta Hernandez says:

      No, I’m not. I’m paraphrasing from the source.

      • buddhaha says:

        You may be paraphrasing, but “gender assigned at birth” is a code phrase of the trans community. It may have a straightforward denotation, which is the way you are using it, but it also, thanks to the incessant hectoring of the identitarian left, has the connotation of an arbitrarily assigned label, changeable at whim, rather than the recognition and documentation of simple physical characteristics. Those characteristics match (>99% of the time) the basic xx vs xy genetics, which in turn will either control or highly influence future physical and mental development. This concept is anathema to those trying to remake society to their preferences.

        I’d use a different phrase, like “physical characteristics at birth”, rather than something which implies fluidity.

  • Bill G says:

    “Necessary care” for that pedophile could be easily supplied. A short rope with a long drop, a bit of electricity, a pure CO atmosphere for a short time, or even a air-bubble injection.

  • Jaynie says:

    “And dog forbid we EVER not make anyone feel special and unique!”

    Well, unless that anyone is a conservative woman – Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Ann Coulter for example.

    • Millie Woods says:

      Ann identifies as a liberal woman who feels compelled to write and speak like an ultra conservative. You wouldn’t want to hate on this new gender, would you? Peace, love and understanding Jaynie.

  • gbear says:

    Freaks of nature should be happy they are no longer called freaks of nature by the majority of non-freaks of nature.

    • GWB says:

      “Freaks of nature” implies they are as nature made them. This is not the case. They are simply “freaks of nature.”

  • GWB says:

    Gender dysphoria is a disorder
    So is the other thing you describe. Just a less treatable one, evidently.

    feel special and unique
    And there’s the problem. Those of us opposed to the “self-esteem movement” from the beginning warned of this.

    Anyone else want to feed this fuckbag into a woodchipper feet first, instead of indulging his psychosis?
    Well, I wouldn’t go that far. I’m more than happy to tar and feather him and run him out of town on a rail, though. (I think we don’t give nearly enough credence to traditional methods of behavior correction. If we could call it, I don’t know, “homeopathic corrective therapy” we might bring it ’round again.)

    This is a big problem with deifying victimhood.
    Well, this aspect of it is the problem with misidentifying “victimhood”.

    who identify as a bowl of spaghetti
    Are they blaspheming, then? Because there is an entire cult associated with wearing colanders on your head……*

    use our tax dollars to indulge
    And here is one of our biggest problems: we are so rich that the consequences of this sort of stupidity can afford to be paid – for a time. We can get away with it because we can afford to indulge. If people had to struggle to get enough food, to put roofs over their heads (heck, we actually indulge the homeless!), clothes on their back, etc., they wouldn’t put up with this nonsense.

    This is why I’ve always disagreed with the utopian visions of humans evolving to a state of leisure and refinement and ascending to some higher state: human nature says otherwise. If we get robots to do all the work for us, we won’t evolve into highly intellectually beings unlocking the mysteries of the universe. No, we’ll evolve into giant slugs, playing video games and arguing over pronouns, with our brains slowly turning to porridge.
    The best we can hope for is that the sun goes nova before we reach that point.

    We shouldn’t worship the bizarre and outlandish.
    Thanks, hippies, for helping to make nonconformity a virtue. *spit*

    (* For those of you not in the know, the Church Of The Flying Spaghetti Monster insists on wearing colanders on their heads. They’re ridiculous and aren’t serious about their so-called beliefs. But they were a mechanism for breaking down the idea of Christianity being the default – for behavior and morals. They are one of the first cases of indulging the ridiculous because “Hey, we have to let people be free, right?” – I think they successfully sued to have their DL picture taken somewhere with the damn colander on their head.)

    • Marta Hernandez says:

      I don’t think gender self-identification is a mental disorder per se. There’s a case for dysphoria – hormone imbalances during pregnancy or something – being a disorder. This garbage about self-identifying is just attention whoring.

      And you’re too nice. I would fucking destroy that pedophilic piece of shit – as slowly and painfully as possible. We put down rabid dogs. This garbage needs to go too.

      • GWB says:

        This garbage about self-identifying is just attention whoring.
        Well, at the very least, that’s narcissism, which used to be considered a disorder.\

        you’re too nice
        Well, I like to have somewhere to ratchet up to as behavior gets worse. Going straight for drawing and quartering kinda leaves you without any further options. 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner