Mentally Strong Kids Need More Than Platitudes

Mentally Strong Kids Need More Than Platitudes

Mentally Strong Kids Need More Than Platitudes

Last night, I came across an article about how to raise “mentally strong kids” that had me rolling my eyes so hard, they’re still being batted around on the floor by the cats. While I’m all for doing whatever you can as a parent to raise you child to be mentally and emotionally strong, you also have to prepare them for the real world–something too many educators and so-called mental health experts seem to have have forgotten.

This list appears in a post on Make It, part of the CNBC umbrella. The author of the post, even open with what could be considered a universal truth, at least in a perfect world: “Every  parent wants their children to be happy and successful.”

And that brings us to the list put together by psychotherapist Amy Morin. Buckle your seat belts, my friends, because this will be a bumpy ride.

The first thing a parent is never to do is tell a kid to “calm down!”. Instead, you are to say something along the lines of “I see you’re really angry right now,” and then discuss the matter as your kid is having a meltdown in the middle of the supermarket aisle or at church–or anywhere else for that matter. According to Morin, we should let the child know it’s okay to feel what they’re feeling, but that they should also pay attention to what they are doing with those feelings.

Now, I don’t know about you, but when my then two- or three-year-old had a meltdown, much of the time he didn’t know why he was so angry. Heck, an older child often doesn’t know the underlying reason, especially if they are overly tired or over-stimulated or hungry, etc. Trying to talk sense to them may be next to impossible in such a situation. So telling them to calm down is the first indication they have that they need to breathe deeply, take a moment and figure out what’s going on.

No, you shouldn’t yell at them to calm down. But calmly telling them to do so? Shrug.

Another thing parents aren’t supposed to say is, “You’ll do fine”. According to Morin, that is tantamount to setting them up for failure. After all, you, as a parent, aren’t able to see into the future. By telling them they will do fine on that test or project or in the upcoming game is tantamount to telling them they don’t have to worry about anything. Then, when they don’t do fine, you not only have lost credibility with them, but it will hurt their confidence. Instead, Morin wants you to say, ‘Get out there and do your best. And if it doesn’t go well, that’s OK. We’ll deal with that too.”

Sorry, but no. If you want to add a qualifier onto the “You’ll do fine,” then add something like “You’ll do fine if you’ve studied/practiced/whatever. All I’m asking is that you do your best.” By adding the “if it doesn’t go well, you are already undermining their confidence by telling them you know–and possibly expect–them not to do well on whatever the activity is. That is a big NOPE! in my book.

Another example of things not to say is “Don’t ever let me catch you doing that again.” This statement, in Morin’s eyes, is bad because she says kids are sneaky and if you tell them this, they will simply try harder to hide what they are doing. Her alternative is to say something like “You’re going to do this again, and you’re going to be tempted to hide it and cover it up. Here’s what we could do instead.”

My issue with this is there are no consequences attached to the bad or questionable behavior. In fact, if you look at Morin’s list of alternative things to say, consequences are never (or at least rarely) mentioned. I don’t know about you, but I have a huge problem with this. We need to teach our kids there are consequences to their actions and those consequences can sometimes have a negative impact. More on this later.

Parents are also not supposed to tell a child what they’ve done is “perfect” or that they–the kid–is the best. In both, she believes the child will start believing they will only receive praise (possibly even love?) if they do something perfectly. While I have an aversion to most generalities, praising a child for getting a 100 on an assignment, especially if it is in a subject they often struggle with is going to do nothing more than raise their confidence and sense of self-worth. That’s especially true if you manage to tie the “perfect” score with their actions that led up to it. Something along the lines of “See, you put in the work and all that hard work paid off.” Action, reaction, consequence–in this case a positive consequence.

I have no doubt, Morin had good interests at heart when she came up with this list. However, it is too general. It paints as the goal making your child feel good without teaching them about consequences. In fact, in at least one case, she offers what many children would see as a reward for what most people would see as questionable, if not bad, behavior.

When talking about how parents shouldn’t tell kids to calm down, she goes on to say that part of the “discussion” about their feelings, etc., you should:

Teach them what to do when you’re [the child–ASG–is] angry,” Morin says. “So instead of throwing something or yelling, maybe you color a picture or you go outside and run or you listen to music for a few minutes.”

What?

Throw a fit, toss a temper tantrum and you get “punished” by being allowed to go outside to play or you can shut yourself off from the world while you listen to music.

Yeah, no.

While I agree whole-heartedly that parents should carefully consider their words before correcting a child, I also believe in consequence. Just as a parent shouldn’t threaten to rip a kid’s face off (and, yes, I’ve heard parents say variations of this), especially in the heat of anger, parents should also teach their children there are negative consequences to bad behavior.

Part of the problem with so many young people right now is they don’t face consequences while in school. Many school districts have gone to policies where students don’t have to turn in homework. Failure to do so will still garner half-credit. FOR DOING NOTHING. Young men (in general) walk around college campuses fearful of being accused of harassing a young woman because they know they will be assumed guilty until proven innocent. In those situations where they are found innocent and the accuser is found to have lied, too often the accuser faces no punishment for the bad action of making a false report. Too bad they’ve already ruined the young man’s reputation and academic career at that university.

Morin’s list assumes the child in question is 1) old enough to have a conversation and understand all the causations and implications of their behavior, 2) will respond to positive reinforcement and never find themselves in a situation as an adult where things actually have a negative consequence. That is a disservice to our children. They need to be taught their actions do have consequences and those consequences can come back and bite them on the butt.

The lesson to take from this? Pay attention to your kids, to what they are doing and saying and why. When they act out, appropriately react to what is happening. Keep them from causing harm to themselves or others (including property and animals). Calm them down without losing your temper. Don’t say anything to them you don’t mean and that you can’t actually do (without ending up in prison or worse). Punish them appropriately based on their age and level of understanding, not to mention the seriousness of their actions. Failure to do any of this will undermine their mental and emotional strength and it will set them up for failure as adults.

Our job as parents is to guide and teach our children. Not pat them on the head and tell them by our lack of reaction (ie consequences) that they can do whatever they want, so long as they use these alternate coping mechanisms.

Here is the caveat: the linked article is the shorthand version of what Morin published in her book “13 Things Mentally Strong Parents Don’t Do: Raising Self-Assured Children and Training Their Brains for a Life of Happiness, Meaning, and Success“. I’ll admit, reading some of the review on Amazon, I wonder if the article’s author did Morin and her list of what not to say a disservice. I leave it to you to read the article and decide whether to read the book. 

Featured Image: Young child throwing a temper tantrum. Created using Midjourney AI by Amanda S. Green.

Written by

11 Comments
  • Deborah B says:

    I am ashamed to say I read this with great enjoyment. I am a mentally strong adult because of how my mother raised my siblings and me. Praise when appropriate and a reasonable scold when necessary. We were always told that we were loved in spite of failings. Eh voila! I raised my son the same way. Along some rocky paths (now an adult) he reminds me that God will see us through and that we both have resilience and strength. “Don’t worry, Mom, we have what it takes.” What more can I ask?

    • Amanda Green says:

      My parents raised me in a similar manner. Praised good behavior/actions/grades, etc. I got in trouble if I broke the rules unless I had a very good–and mitigating–reason for doing so. They never held me to an impossible standard. The question became “did you do your best?”. I knew they meant did I do everything I could to make the grade, finish the chore, etc. As long as I did my best, I didn’t get in trouble. But we would discuss ways to improve my performance. There were always consequences–some good and some bad, depending on what I did. Shrug.

  • NTSOG says:

    “The first thing a parent is never to do is tell a kid to “calm down!”. Instead, you are to say something along the lines of “I see you’re really angry right now,” and then discuss the matter as your kid is having a meltdown in the middle of the supermarket aisle”

    No. The most I would [pleasantly] say to child who is becoming ‘agitated’ or moody is “What are you meant to be doing?” I never talk about what children should NOT be doing if I see ‘attitude’ developing.

    I have seen parents and teachers trying to ‘counsel’ children who are having tantrums and being willful in various settings. My professional advice was always to manage the behaviour and take control first, especially in public settings because such out-of-control behaviour in public can be dangerous. If it means grabbing the child and bundling him into the car and taking him/her home [or back to school] to cool down in his/her bedroom – alone, so be it. [I have taken children to supermarkets for training knowing that they would tantrum and simply stood holding them by the arm until their tantrum was finished and then gone on with my ‘shopping’ as though nothing happened.] In fact I often recommended parents make pretend shopping ‘training trips’ to supermarkets knowing that they didn’t have to do any shopping. If the child acted up s/he was bundled into the car and straight home to time out under supervision – without comment. If possible the parent would go out shopping again without the child or take a sibling.

    It is not possible to have a reasoned discussion with a child who is either ‘off the air’ or being manipulative. A lot of the ‘tantrums’ I observed in my 40 years of behaviour management work were ‘put on’ for effect so as to embarrass parents in public places and gain illicit control. They weren’t really out of self control. [Many children learn to put on a ‘tantrum’ at the supermarket checkout where there is always an audience to manipulate – and candy bars within arm’s reach.] If a child has cooled down and is compliant then a discussion about appropriate behaviour might then occur – later at home when the parent and child are both calm, but to attempt to counsel a child having a tantrum about the ‘meaning of life’ while s/he is screaming and thrashing about, perhaps kicking, hitting and biting is ridiculous. Such children are simply not in the right frame of mind to attend.

    It is fundamental principle of behaviour intervention to manage the presenting behaviour, i.e. the non-compliant tantrum, first and deal with the social meaning later when all are calm.

    As for consequences: the Lord or Lady of the house giveth and also taketh away all privilege. Tantrum in the supermarket? Child loses a privilege for that day. [I used to be sent to bed without eating evening meal in consequence of my often violent tantrums. Eventually I learned self-control though my younger brother has a scar between his eyes where my toy metal spade struck him at 15 feet! I was 6 years old.] Tomorrow’s a new day. The rules reset and the business of training reasonable compliant behaviour starts afresh. [Too many parents ban a privilege for a week or more leaving the child feeling s/he has no chance of redemption.]

    • GWB says:

      What you’ve written is the basis for a great conversation. And it is very similar to Dobson’s book’s advice. The biggest problem in raising our children today is no one telling the child “You’re not in control here,” and understanding that’s a good and right thing.

      My only change to what you’ve written above is that a violent child or one who is being extremely loud and obnoxious needs a swat as an immediate reminder that that is entirely unacceptable behavior and now they will receive consequences. It’s utter hogwash that a moment of physical discipline “engenders more violence.” (And I’m not implying you said otherwise, you simply left off the topic of physical discipline.)

      • NTSOG says:

        G’day GWB – Corporal punishment is a vexed subject. I didn’t experience it save at the hands of a very aggressive and sarcastic year 7 mathematics teacher who humiliated students with public beatings when they did not meet his expectations. He did great harm to me with his punitive methods. He fitted perfectly the saying ‘Floggings will continue until morale improves!’

        The problem with corporal punishment is that it often predominates to the exclusion of positive reinforcement. If there is use of the metaphorical ‘stick’ there must be much greater application of ‘carrots’. Generally a ratio of 4 instances of positive reinforcement for correct behaviour to one instance of punishment at a minimum is desired in effective behaviour management programs. I suspect that in well organised and positively functioning families children being naughty can and do tolerate and may benefit from an occasional smack on the bottom. Professionally I have been involved in far too many cases where the only attention children [and adults in institutions!] receive is punitive and aggressively physical to the point that the recipient of the physical punishment starts to perceive the punishments as positively reinforcing: any attention, even a painful whack on the head, is thus good attention. The mindset of a child on the receiving end of constant [corporal] punishment becomes literally ‘I’m bad and I’m very good at being bad!’ Being ‘bad’ becomes a source of pride. We see this in those street-smart youths committing home invasions and stealing cars which they wreck at high speed, broadcasting their stupidity on the internet. Being ‘bad’ is a badge of pride to them.

        Another issue is that ‘what goes around, comes around’. I worked with a family who had an autistic/ mentally retarded daughter from when she was aged 7. I constantly urged the mother to refrain from using corporal punishment and follow the same successful positive management program I devised for the child at her school. The mother didn’t. She hit her daughter with any implement that came to hand if the girl’s behaviour was poor. [In fact she once boasted that she ‘broke three wooden spoons’ when hitting the girl.] By the time the daughter was 17 she was taller than her mother and heavier. She turned the tables on her mother to the point that her mother could not be left alone with the daughter and the girl’s smaller and younger brother started to carry a cut-down broom stick around for defence of himself and his mother if the father or another strong male was not present. The only control the mother had was vested in her physical ability to hurt her daughter and once the daughter was too big and strong the mother had no power at all. The daughter then copied her mother’s methods and took control of the family. Soon after she was placed in full-time care as there was no way to change the patterns [taught by the mother originally] within the family.

        In short I don’t recommend corporal punishment, though I have physically intervened to restrain violent children and adults many hundreds of times using methods that are legally acceptable and non- aversive. That is, the physical intervention was not designed to inflict pain, but simply to control out-of-control people until their rage passed.

    • Amanda Green says:

      Well said.

  • GWB says:

    Throw a fit, toss a temper tantrum and you get “punished” by being allowed to go outside to play or you can shut yourself off from the world while you listen to music.
    That’s not what she’s actually saying. She’s saying to teach them (well, she’s saying tell them, but you have to teach them) to substitute another action for the tantrum. Which is sorta ok. If it involves walking away from the confrontation and slamming doors, then it’s not really ok, as you’ve just substituted snubbing someone for yelling at them.

    Morin’s list assumes the child in question is…
    3) Rational. A big part of raising a child is taming their emotions (hence, stopping tantrums and such). And reason isn’t the temper tamper most people think. (Just think about all the jokes about telling women to “calm down”.)

    A better place to start, IMO, is a book written a long time ago, when dinosaurs roamed Colorado Springs. (Heck, I don’t even think Dobson was in CSprings, yet, when he wrote the book.) It’s How To Raise A Strong-Willed Child, by Dr James Dobson. (There’s a newer version called The New Strong-Willed Child; I’m not sure it’s better than the original.) He discusses the difference between a compliant and a strong-willed child. And he provides helps for dealing with the strong-willed one to raise them up into a properly strong-willed adult. (I didn’t have my strong-willed child until after I had read the book. 🙂 )

    One of the good things about Dobson’s book(s) is that he explains why simply spanking a strong-willed child might be necessary but also might develop the wrong response from the child. He doesn’t just put together a trite, one-size-fits-all proscription – he explains how to look for and deliver the discipline that particular child will respond well to.

    • GWB says:

      And I messed up the closing tag after “tell” in the parenthetical of my first sentence. /sigh/

    • Amanda Green says:

      I loved Dobson’s book back when it came out. I still refer friends to it when they ask for books in this area.

  • Bluegreen kayak says:

    A story I heard about dealing with children’s behavior that gave me a chuckle: A family attended the first service at church one Sunday. The children misbehaved constantly, in spite of both parents’ efforts. When the service ended, the parents stayed in their pew. The kids asked “Aren’t we going?” and their folks said no, since they misbehaved during the first service, they would all be staying for the second one. Things went better after that.

    • NTSOG - Jim Crawford says:

      That’s what I call good [behaviour] management. The parents got to leave the church on their terms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead