Evil Trump Stops Immigrant Children From Visiting White House

Evil Trump Stops Immigrant Children From Visiting White House

Evil Trump Stops Immigrant Children From Visiting White House

At least that’s what the frothing-at-the-mouth news media and outraged parents would have you believe. “White House Turns Away Foreign Students on Tour With Class,” screamed headlines in the New York Post, with the story picked up verbatim by the Daily Mail Fail, and others. I realize that expecting the news media to be objective when it comes to this President is like expecting a freebie from a hooker, but really? This?

What transpired on November 15th was a massive FAIL on the part of the school administrators and parents – not EEEEEEVIL Trump or the EEEEEEvil Trump Secret Service.

A group of seventh-graders from Henry Hudson Regional School in Highlands braved a snowstorm on Nov. 15 for a long-awaited bus trip to Washington DC.

The bad weather and treacherous road conditions added hours to the drive and left no time for anything but their visit to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Even lunch on the White House lawn was canceled.

But the snafus didn’t stop there. Months in advance, the school had to send the White House visitors office a list of all students and adults expected to take the tour.

After making it through an initial checkpoint, Secret Service agents stopped three Henry Hudson students who didn’t have their passports or other identification required for non-US citizens.

Note the following in this report:

– Students “braved” a snowstorm (in a bus – probably a heated one). They did so in treacherous conditions – oh such heroes (as a parent, I would have questioned the wisdom of not rescheduling the trip, given the road hazards, but OK – beside the point).

– It was a “long-awaited” trip to Washington DC, because we must whip up sympathy for these kids.

– A longtime security policy at the White House is now portrayed as a “snafu” without explaining whose screw-up it really was.

– Secret Service officers are portrayed as anti-immigrant for doing their job.

Guess what, critters! That’s not how any of this works, and no matter how hard you try to paint Trump, his Administration, and the officers who are tasked with protecting the President and his family, as evil anti-immigrant ogres, the facts don’t support your bias.

Having worked in close proximity to the White House, and having briefed in its situation rooms, as well as the Old Executive, I can tell you that every last visitor must present identification. I was a government employee with a clearance, and yet, I still wouldn’t step foot into the White House without proper ID.

Yes, I had to submit my information to WAVES (the White House Worker and Visitor Entry System). That information included full name, date of birth, current residence, social security number, and other info. It didn’t matter that I was a cleared government employee who had been to the White House complex numerous times; I still had to submit my info. If I wanted to include family or friends on the visit, I had to submit WAVES information of each person accompanying me, and the information submitted to WAVES had to match the information on their government ID exactly.

This is not an anti-immigrant thing. It’s a security thing. The requirements are plainly listed on the White House website. All these school administrators and parents had to do was click, read, and ensure they complied with the regulations.

But apparently that was too much to ask.

The Post buries the details inside the story – details that make it clear that the “snafu” was the responsibility of the idiot school administrators and the imbecile parents who decided their special snowflakes should just be allowed inside one of the most secure locations in the United States, where the leader of the free world resides, without ID. “They are here on visas, but they didn’t bring any of that stuff,” according to one dad. “They didn’t have any ID on them.”

Henry Hudson administrators apparently did not verify that all students had the right ID before hitting the road, parents told The Post. [emphasis mine]

When the Secret Service denied entry to the three kids, Principal Lenore Kingsmore stayed outside with them, said school board member Karen Horner.

“She was very upset. She was probably more upset than they were,” Horner said.

I bet she was upset! It’s the Secret Service’s job to secure the White House, the grounds around it, and those inside. I remember having to “shelter in place” more than once while Secret Service Uniformed Division officers ran around with firearms to ensure the complex was safe. There were numerous times when random nutjobs attempted to climb the White House fence, with one getting stuck on the fence and hanging by her shoelaces. There was that time Jesse Olivieri decided it would be a great idea to just barrel toward Secret Service officers outside the White House carrying a handgun.

Incidents happen near the White House several times per month, ranging from random crackpots climbing the fence to suspicious packages left near the complex – an area with massive amounts of foot traffic, where thousands of people could sustain injuries or worse.

And although a few 12-13 year olds are most likely not going to be a security problem, the Secret Service has a job to do, and they did it without prejudice.

But that didn’t stop the outrage!

“What are 12 -and 13-year-olds going to do? It doesn’t make sense,” a dad said

“It’s disgusting. You don’t do that to children,” said another.

Disgusting? I realize these people are from New Jersey, and are therefore probably not big fans of the President, but the rules for visiting the White House have not changed, as I can attest from working under previous administrations, so these parents’ outrage is misdirected. One student claims her classmates simply didn’t know they had to bring their passports, and that’s the fault of school administrators and not the hardworking Secret Service officers who do their jobs with efficient professionalism, no matter who is in the White House.

And although the Post spends a lot of time lionizing and deifying the poor students and their “heroic” principal who huddled in the cold with them while the others – whose parents bothered to read the regulations – took a quick tour and gives a significant amount of space to the ensuing outrage, it buries the one sentence about who should bear the responsibility for this “snafu” in the middle of their story.

This is subtle, more insidious media bias that I consider to be just as dangerous as what many will call “fake news.” Spin, words meant to incite certain emotions, buried critical information – all these tactics contribute to the public’s distrust of the media.

Media bias is nothing new. I’ve written about it before and so have other Victory Girls, and it’s existed for centuries.

But while we vilify outlets like CNN and MSNBC for their open hostility to this President and his administration, we tend to gloss over shrewd, more devious forms of bias that permeate media reporting on all sides of the political aisle – hell, we sometimes seek out “news” from a conservative point of view, instead of seeking out facts!

It’s time we started demanding more from the Fourth Estate.

Featured photo by Vanessa Pena via AP.

Written by

Marta Hernandez is an immigrant, writer, editor, science fiction fan (especially military sci-fi), and a lover of freedom, her children, her husband and her pets. She loves to shoot, and range time is sacred, as is her hiking obsession, especially if we’re talking the European Alps. She is an avid caffeine and TWD addict, and wants to own otters, sloths, wallabies, koalas, and wombats when she grows up.

  • Kathy says:

    I’m afraid that it is too late to get any improvement in the current fourth estate. A complete replacement may be needed.

  • GWB says:

    “They are here on visas, but they didn’t bring any of that stuff,”
    Ummm, do they understand they could have been arrested and deported for traveling *anywhere* without their passport and visa while in the US as a foreigner?!?
    These people sound like they’re pretty entitled to me. Maybe their parents should be investigated and rousted back to their home country if they think they can flout our laws?

    What are 12 -and 13-year-olds going to do?
    You mean like the 12- and 13-year-olds in Iraq and Afghanistan who wear suicide vests? Or like the ones that plant roadside IEDs? The ones who get used precisely because our folks tend to trust kids?
    *YOU* people wanted us not to profile, so suck it up, buttercup!

    Media bias [has] existed for centuries.
    Yeah, but it’s only been since progressivism that they saw themselves as somehow on the side of angels, and therefore whatever they believe must be right and, naturally, “unbiased”.

    Yeah, this story should never have seen the light of day. Except someone had a grievance, and it MUST BE AIRED! AND YOU MUST JOIN IN THE OUTRAGE! It’s like Festivus all friggin’ year.

  • Wfjag says:

    I wonder if the NY Post reporter knows that you can’t cross from the US into Canada without a valid passport in hand, and if you don’t have one, you’ll be stopped and turned back ? But, that’s OK, because Canada is a country, and as a country, has a sovereign right to protect its border security. It was fine for the Obama administration to close the White House and detain/ deport people entering the US without a valid passport and visa, but in the time of NIT (Now It’s Trump), it’s all different.

  • Citizen tom says:

    The mass media wages a continuous hate campaign against the Trump administration. At the same time they expect the Trump administration to relax security procedures? Makes one wonder about the intentions of these people.

    The Liberal Democrats in the mass media may praying with respect to our leaders, but I seriously doubt their prayers include any wishes for Trump’s continued good health. Guess the rest us better do that.

  • Dorzak says:

    I visited the Washington, DC area on a school trip in 1990. At the time the White House was suddenly closed to visitors while we were in DC. No explanation. Tour bus driver/guide said it happens from time to time. I never assumed we were being singled out.

  • ESP says:

    In the good ol’ days, you didn’t need a passport to cross the border. For instance, about 1968, crossing from Minnesota into Canada:

    Canadian border agent: Hello, sir, what’s the purpose of your visit?

    Grandpa: We’re going fishing for a week around Thunder Bay.

    Canadian border agent: Thank you, sir. Welcome to Canada.

    That was it. Gramps never even had to present so much as a driver’s license, and he lived in Wisconsin, traveling with two grand-kids from Minnesota.

    The fishing was great.

    15 years later in 1980 I went to Canada to see clients maybe a dozen times and never had to present a passport.

    Things have obviously changed for obvious reasons.

    But, whenever I was abroad, whether France, the UK, Hong Kong, China, Cayman and everywhere else I always had my passport with me. What sort of visitor wouldn’t? You’re a guest of the country you’re in and required to comply with the local rules on pain of being thrown out for failure to do so.

    Screw these self-entitled jerks who don’t seem to comprehend really basic stuff like that their idiot kid won’t be admitted to the White House with zero documentation.

  • Formerly known as Skeptic says:

    Lunch on the White House lawn? On Nov 15th? Snowstorm or not, the planning was sorely lacking.

  • Edwin says:

    I there

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner