“Dumb” Hillary Clinton NY Times Op-Ed

“Dumb” Hillary Clinton NY Times Op-Ed

“Dumb” Hillary Clinton NY Times Op-Ed

On Tuesday, Hillary Clinton posted on “X” “You have got to be kidding me.” about the Trump Administration and Signalgate. I called out her utter crust in “Extremely Careless” Hillary Clinton On Leaked War Plans” because “extremely careless” is what James Comey once said about Hillary herself. Now, Hillary has written a guest editorial for the New York Times “Hillary Clinton: How Much Dumber Will This Get?”, proving that Hillary is just plain dumb? Or, is Hillary a sociopath or psychopath or both?

There has NEVER been a public figure in American life with such an utter lack of self-awareness. Hillary wants to burn the Trump Administration over Signalgate when her life is a string of failures covered by people’s love for her husband. She begins her essay in the Times with:

It’s not the hypocrisy that bothers me; it’s the stupidity. We’re all shocked — shocked! — that President Trump and his team don’t actually care about protecting classified information or federal record retention laws. But we knew that already. What’s much worse is that top Trump administration officials put our troops in jeopardy by sharing military plans on a commercial messaging app and unwittingly invited a journalist into the chat. That’s dangerous. And it’s just dumb.

Dumb, she says? We really don’t know how a predator journalist got on the call or if he was really on the call at all or if he was sent near real time screenshots. If he was on the call, how did he get their. If NatSec Advisor Mike Walz put him on the call, why? Nevertheless, Signal was pre-loaded on those government phones and beloved by the Biden Administration.

I don’t think Hillary Clinton wants to bring up putting “our troops in jeopardy”. Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith and CIA Security personnel Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were unavailable for comment. Their deaths and the Benghazi hearings gave us a glimpse in Hillary’s Emotional Intelligence (EQ).

And, just why was Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi? From National Review:

Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.

Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow [Qaddafi] on the cheap.”

This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda — indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.

This was eleven months after the Qaddafi regime fell because of Obama and Clinton. What do we have in Libya now? From CNN 2017:

“Eight hundred,” says the auctioneer. “900 … 1,000 … 1,100 …” Sold. For 1,200 Libyan dinars – the equivalent of $800.

Not a used car, a piece of land, or an item of furniture. Not “merchandise” at all, but two human beings.

One of the unidentified men being sold in the grainy cell phone video obtained by CNN is Nigerian. He appears to be in his twenties and is wearing a pale shirt and sweatpants.

He has been offered up for sale as one of a group of “big strong boys for farm work,” according to the auctioneer, who remains off camera. Only his hand – resting proprietorially on the man’s shoulder – is visible in the brief clip.

After seeing footage of this slave auction, CNN worked to verify its authenticity and traveled to Libya to investigate further.

Carrying concealed cameras into a property outside the capital of Tripoli last month, we witness a dozen people go “under the hammer” in the space of six or seven minutes.

Libya was never a beacon of human right but Hillary Clinton broke Libya so she owns it. Never forget how much Hillary Clinton wanted war in Libya to satisfy her bloodthirsty desire for power.

Remember how she used to run around talking about “smart power”? That’s it she just ran around flapping her gums. Getting people killed and making life worse for everyone else. Hillary Clinton should never use the word dumb about anyone else.

Featured Image: Donkey Hotey/Wikimedia Commons.org/cropped/Creative Commons

Written by

4 Comments
  • Scott says:

    No question it’s both! Hitlery cares about herself and nothing / Noone else. Her entire life proves this, as does the trail of bodies that has followed her through life.

  • […] of Freedom, Valor Friday, and Four US troops lost Transterrestrial Musings: DOGE Victory Girls: “Dumb” Hillary Clinton NY Times Op-Ed Watts Up With That: Climate Central’s Urban Rainfall Claims Are All Wet, OOPS —UPFs are Not […]

  • WJ GOOD says:

    All the fingerprints of a deep state fake. A Hillary Clinton op ed is just a cherry on top to prove it.

  • Patrick McNally says:

    There’s a fair choice she could have become POTUS if she had been more patient and objective. After 8 years of Obama, I didn’t that a Democrat was likely to win in 2016. It was the same way in 2008 when, after 8 years of Bush, I couldn’t imagine a Republican winning. If HC had been smart, she should have hung back in 2016 and encouraged Biden to run. I don’t think this would have prevented Trump’s win, but it would have enabled her to appear as a modest person while getting ready to challenge Trump in perhaps 2020. But she wasn’t willing to admit that people might just be tired of Democrats after 8 years and that maybe it would be smarter to hang back for a while.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead