Previous post

8 Ways Fascist Feminists Are Ruining America’s Women

Next post

8 Ways Fascist Feminists Are Ruining America’s Women

Originally posted at David Horowitz’s Newsreal:

American women have some of the best lives in the world. We can literally do whatever we want. American women can go to school where we want, we can go to college, we can work wherever we want, we can marry whoever we want, and we can choose to lead whatever kind of life we want to lead. Millions of women in oppressed countries around the world cannot even imagine the freedom that American women so enjoy — and take for granted. We’ve come a long way in less than one hundred short years, but a lot of women can’t see that.

We’re constantly told that we’re victims of an invisible patriarchy, that we’re slaves to our hormones, that without abortion on demand we can’t fully be women, that we don’t need a man but we need the government. The people that tell women these lies are the same people who pretend to be fighting for us, who have hijacked feminism: the fascist feminists. Whereas once feminists fought for equality, today the femisogynists fight for things like taxpayer funded abortion and universal health care. They fight for women to be able to sleep around like men and ignore the consequences. And most of the time, women don’t even know they’re being manipulated and lied to. Thankfully, once the lies are exposed, it’s easy to see the con.

Here are eight ways that fascist feminists are ruining America’s women.

8. Encouraging Promiscuity

Once upon a time, men had to earn sex with a woman. He would have to take her on a series of dates. He would have to enter into a relationship with her to prove his commitment to her. He would have to invest time, money, and emotions into their relationship. The woman held all of the power. Now, men don’t even have to take women onto dates. Often, dating happens after a couple has started sleeping together regularly. Men barely have to put any effort into it anymore, women just give it up hours after meeting random guys at a bar or a party.

This, according to the femisogynists, is called being “empowered”. It’s being in charge of your sexuality. As far as they’re concerned, all that you need to do is get yourself some birth control and you’re A-OK. Emotional consequences? STDs? No problem! As long as you don’t get pregnant, sleeping around is just fine, even if you’re still in high school.

The problem? Most women don’t feel this way, and especially not young girls. Two-thirds of teenage girls who have sex in high school go on to regret it. Teenagers who have sex are much more likely to be depressed or suicidal. 1/4 of sexually active teens have an STD. A whopping 8,000 teens get an STD daily. And, even when you use contraception, pregnancy is still a possibility. Teenage mothers have higher likelihoods of poverty and dependence on welfare. But do the fascist feminists care about any of this? Nope! It’s sexual freedom, baby. Who cares about the consequences? If it feels good, just do it. The problem is that sex has become so devalued that celibacy has actually become trendy. Women are realizing that sleeping around all the time with tons of different men does not bring you strength or empowerment or freedom or love. But femisogynists don’t want women to know that.

Feministing founder Jessica Valenti wrote an entire book about it called The Purity Myth. Expecting women to be abstinent is ridiculous, virginity is weird, and fathers wanting their daughters not to have sex is creepy. But casual one-night stands? Hook-ups? SO awesome! Just use a condom, because they’re totally foolproof. Abstain? Hold out? So for our grandparents’ generation and un-empowered, frigid, prude chicks.

7. Sanctioning Victimhood

If a woman loses to a man in an election, it’s because she’s a girl. If a woman doesn’t get a promotion, it’s the patriarchy trying to keep her down. If a man winks at a woman on the street, he’s just trying to keep her in her place. If a woman gets accidentally pregnant, her life is forever ruined and her only option is to get an abortion.

These are some of the attitudes you’ll find in the fascist feminist set.

Rather than encouraging women to take control of their own lives and be truly empowered, the femisogynists are forever trying to make sure that women always wallow in victimhood. Everything is sexist, everything, from jeans to office dress codes to the obvious fact that men like to look at boobs. They complain that there aren’t equal numbers of men and women committing suicide. Even having babies is considered sexist (but more on that later). Radical feminists see sexism everywhere, and the patriarchy is always trying to keep women down. But how does this do women any favors?

The reality is that sexism is not everywhere, and women cannot be truly empowered if they see themselves as consummate victims. The reality is that the victim act is really just an excuse for fascist feminists to be greedy little whiners who get special treatment.

6. Dabbling In Misandry

Feminism has gotten a nasty reputation. Radical feminists are to blame for this of course, and they whine about it incessantly. Ask anyone what they think of when they hear the word “feminism”, and they’ll almost always think of “man-haters”. And there’s a good reason for it, too. When radical feminists hijacked feminism, a great many of the people involved in the radical feminist movement do indeed hate men.

A large part of the man-hating movement from the fascist feminists involves domestic violence and rape, which are, of course, horrible. The vast majority of men do not beat or rape their wives or daughters and find men that do despicable. But fascist feminists paint all men with a broad brush, so that even men who don’t engage in domestic violence or rape are still somehow responsible for it. And if they aren’t angry, violent oppressors, then they are useless, worthless creatures who are inferior to women. You will find some of the most awful vitriol aimed at men in the fascist feminist movement. The depths of the anger that these women possess is disturbing. Maybe they didn’t have a father growing up, maybe they had a boyfriend who did beat them, but for whatever reason, many of the fascist feminists truly hate men. The only men they approve of are feminized-beta male-Michael Cera-types, who I guess pose no threat to them because they’ll roll over and do anything a woman wants them to do.

It’s sad and ridiculous that femisogynists spend so much time accusing American men of oppressing women, and then completely ignore the actual oppression women face in the Middle East. The radical feminists are almost completely silent about that. They’ll throw it a bone every now and again, but by and large, they ignore it. Women in the Middle East are raped and have no way of getting justice for it; they are sold into slavery through forced marriages when they are still children. Oftentimes they cannot get an education or work among men. They cannot wear what they want, practice whatever faith they want, or make their own decisions. And this is all because of actual sexist men. But radical feminists ignore them and set their sights on American men, some of the most enlightened men on the planet.

Ask any American man who has a daughter, a sister, or a wife what he wants for American women, and most of them will say that they want girls to be able to get an education and be whatever they want to be. In this last presidential election, Hillary Clinton came extremely close to winning the Democratic nomination for president — that alone shows how far we have come. But fascist feminists ignore that, because they have an anti-male agenda to push.

5. Destroying Chivalry

One of the easiest ways a man can show respect towards a woman is through chivalrous actions. Opening a door, pulling out a chair, giving up a seat for a lady… actions like these all show deference and respect for a woman. Being willing to protect a woman and put yourself at risk for her shows her value and worth. But for some reason, chivalry has come under attack. Men don’t practice chivalry anymore, to the disappointment of women everywhere.

Why not? Well, according to a poll taken of college men, it’s because of radical feminism. Chivalry has been dubbed sexist. There’s an attitude from women that they don’t need a man. Women act as if chivalrous actions are somehow disrespectful. So why should men continue to be chivalrous? Many, many women are completely unappreciative when men treat them like a lady. And, according to the femisogynists, things like holding doors open for women are totally sexist. Fascist feminists see chivalry as dated, sexist, and demeaning. It doesn’t matter that most women yearn for it deep down. They miss romance, they miss dating, and they miss being treated with respect and honor. How many times do women cry on the phone to their friends that they can’t find a man who treats them well? Killing chivalry has a lot to do with that. Women have been manipulated and conditioned to see chivalry as something antiquated and disrespectful, so they spurn it when they see it. They still crave it though. They’re wanting something better.

Chivalry gives a woman power, the very thing that femisogynists claim to be after. If a man is going out of his way to be chivalrous towards a women, it’s because he respects her, it’s because he sees value in her, and it’s because he wants to show that he is worthy of her. Chivalry is actually empowering to women, it elevates them, but it’s missing in our relationships today because fascist feminists destroyed it. It says a lot more about the worldview of the radical feminists than it does about the merits of chivalry.

4. Attacking Motherhood

What would women say their most important role is as a woman? Could it be high-powered careerwoman? Sexually liberated minx? Pro-abortion activist? Maybe these are the most important roles a radical feminist could play, but for most normal women, their most important role is that of mother.

Think about it. Motherhood is biologically hardwired into us. Most women feel called to have children, and feel that there is nothing more beautiful or precious than a child. It’s why so many women are devastated when they miscarry or can’t have children. It’s also why so many women are destroyed after an abortion — they realize that they’ve just killed their baby.

Fascist feminists, though, want to free women of their motherhood chains. Having babies is sexist and breastfeeding is creepy. Nuclear families are dangerous, and motherhood destroys your life. It’s their own agenda that is being pushed, not what women actually want or need.

3. Requiring A Feminist Litmus Test

Nothing angers leftist feminists more than combining the words “feminism” and “Sarah Palin” in a sentence. When Sarah Palin defined herself as a feminist, Jessica Valenti and the feminist left lost their minds. That’s because to the fascist feminists, only certain women count as “real” feminists. Amanda Marcotte even helpfully defined the specific issues that women are supposed to care about. Only women who cater to the liberal extremist agenda can be called feminists to women like Jessica Valenti and Amanda Marcotte.

Consider Sarah Palin, a feminist if there ever was one. She’s an empowered, self-made woman with a high-powered, successful career. She also has five beautiful children, and a loving, supportive husband. She’s even admitted to struggling with the thought of having an abortion, but chose instead to give birth to her son Trig. But because she is a conservative, and because she is pro-life, she is shunned by the fascist feminist set.

The truth is, they’re likely intimidated by strong conservative women. Conservative women don’t live in a world of constant victimhood. They don’t define themselves by their gender. And when conservative women like Sarah Palin and Nikki Haley endure disgusting misogynist attacks, they don’t wail about the patriarchy keeping them down. And conservative women actually represent feminism and the average American woman, whereas femisogynists represent only themselves and their own pro-abortion, sexist, anti-male, victimized agenda. When faced with true empowerment, fascist feminists can only try to tear the empowered women down.

2. Promoting Lies and Manipulation

The lengths femisogynists will go to in order to keep abortion legal and commonplace are shocking and despicable. The abortion lobby, and Planned Parenthood in particular, profits off of the lies and manipulation of women. Live Action has exposed the dishonesty in their Rosa Acuna Project, which shows how far clinics will go in order to convince a woman to get an abortion. They’ll tell women that there isn’t a baby inside their womb, they’ll lie about the heart beating, or how developed the baby is. Clinics routinely give out medically false information to women, and radical pro-abortion feminists never say a word about lying to women in order to sell an abortion.

But if you really want to anger the fascist feminists, bring up mandatory pre-abortion ultrasounds, which they call emotionally torturous. One mother interviewed by the New York Times about seeing an ultrasound before her abortion said that women “almost have to think of it as an alien” in order to keep the images from haunting them. Of course the images haunt women — it’s an image of their unborn child that they’re about to kill! Seeing that image will convince many women not to have the abortion. And this is why the pro-abortion feminists are so vehemently against making women see an ultrasound first. They claim to be pro-choice, but how can anyone be pro-choice if they can’t make an informed choice?

The femisogynists don’t want women making their own choice when it comes to abortion. They want women with unplanned pregnancies to choose abortion, always, and never to keep their babies. So they excuse the lies, cover up the manipulation, and fight an ultrasound which would force abortion providers to be truthful about the baby they’re about to kill. If women are going to have abortions, then abortion providers and the pro-abortion feminists owe it to those women to at least give them medically accurate information.

1. Glorifying Abortion

There is perhaps nothing more anti-woman than abortion. But the pro-abortion radical feminists have flipped that onto its head, claiming that to be against abortion is to be anti-woman. And this may be the number one way that fascist feminists are destroying women.

Right now, 22% of all pregnancies will end in abortion. But how does abortion hurt women?

Well, first there are the physical risks. Abortion triples the risk of breast cancer, and abortions also increase the risk of future miscarriages. Emotionally, there are also some horrific consequences. Women who abort are much more likely to commit suicide, with a suicide rate three times higher than the general suicide rate. Women who have an abortion are at a higher risk for long-term clinical depression. There is also a link between abortion and substance abuse, and it can even have an effect on the children who were not aborted (called Survivor Syndrome). There’s also been a connection found between abortion and subsequent child abuse.

But all of this is denied by the fascist feminists. Abortion is important, because an accidental pregnancy will ruin your life! It’s horrifying how much the radical feminists actively try to convince women to have an abortion, that it’s no big deal, that you won’t feel guilt, sorrow, and regret for the rest of your life. The facts are clearly against them, which is why they try so hard to cover those facts up.

The truth is that abortion is not just some normal little medical procedure; it’s a tragedy. Most women intuitively know that; it’s why so many women struggle so much after aborting their children, especially when they realize they’ve been lied to or manipulated into doing it. That is anti-life, and it is anti-woman. It’s a tragedy, for the life that was lost and for the women who have to live with the consequences for the rest of their lives.

The radical pro-abortion crowd fights for abortion “rights” because they have an agenda to push. They don’t care about how harmful it is, and how it can absolutely destroy a woman.

Written by

29 Comments
  • ck says:

    I agree with everything but the promiscuity part.Female promiscuity is needed in any society. The sad fact is 80% of men like women/sex while 20% of women like men/sex.All through history men have been able trade a days wages for an un-begged for bit of loving. If a man can pay instead of beg every couple of weeks, he can go home to his bitter, demanding hag of a wife and not hate life in general and his wife in particular. Put the whorehouses back on the edge of town, legally, cut out the pimps and hardened streetwalkers. The sexless bitches can keep their husbands and privileged lifestyles and the henpecked husbands can have something to look foreword to in their bleak existences.

  • Anonymous says:

    And, not to mention that on #5 having good manners and being responsible is now considered to be a loser “beta male,” unlike the more manly “alpha male” that’s “a lotta fun” and arousing for #8 and can be complained about as a “rotten bastard” (“Where are all th good men?”) later in #6 when he cheats, gets them pregnant and/or STDed, etc.

  • Clifton Chadwick says:

    Cassy, this is excellent. I agree with just about 96% (Joking, I agree!)
    All the best!

  • Robert says:

    I take it from the location that either you or Matt (possibly both) are in the Green Machine. To that I say Semper Fi!

    I raised one daughter, and am raising another. The first is strong, proud and well educated. She married a strong man who is a good father. It was easier with my first in some ways because as time passes the assault I see on boys as run by the education establishment makes it harder for my youngest to understand that boys are good: After all she will want to marry one some day.

    I enjoy your blog. Keep up the good work. Oorah.

  • Miles Amblish says:

    It is not terribly popular for women to identify themselves as feminists any longer. The “National Organization of Women” rolls have declined in size and stature. There was a time, it the distant past, when NOW was relevant in the lives of women but now is simply a part of the Democratic party apparatus.

  • ming vazquez says:

    I was almost agreeing with you until I saw that this commentary is a bunch of nutjob, religious right bs. I agree with the part on Chivalry being dead but when you start assuming that every woman wants a baby or is hard wired for motherhood, you really miss the mark. Your commentary then becomes a rant.

  • Eric says:

    I’ll have to take exception with this whole article only because you counter acted yourself in #6. You do the exact same thing “painting with a broad brush” all so called fascist feminist. Kinda blew the whole argument for me.

  • Debbie says:

    Cassy, THANK YOU for saying what needs to be said!! I am so glad their are young women like you to tell the world how we the truly EMPOWERED women feel!!

    Ps I am the mom of a 23 year old young man and he holds the door open for women!

  • marilyn says:

    We live in the same place but are separated by decades of experience. You appear to be very confident in labeling something of which you apparently have no firsthand knowledge. In this town you are surrounded by women that are over-worked, under-paid and face discrimination every day. Of course when all of your basic needs are taken care of by the government you have the free time to pass judgement on others.

  • kirroth says:

    “but when you start assuming that every woman wants a baby or is hard wired for motherhood, you really miss the mark”

    Uh, seriously? Do you really think that not all women are wired for motherhood? Do you not understand what a female is?

  • Joel says:

    Excellent piece! I will subscribe to your blog. I’ve sent this piece to everybody! 🙂

    #5 couldn’t be more true! I’ve actually been scolded for opening a door for a lady. Luckily, most girls still appreciate it. I’m always surprised when they tell me that it rarely happens.

    Keep up the good work.

    Joel
    http://politicallogic.us

  • Nicole says:

    Excellent article! 🙂

  • Joe says:

    You forgot “A sense of entitlement”

    It’s the notion that what the woman wants not only trumps what men want, but that the man is a loser, flake and jerk for rejecting this.

  • Cylar says:

    “I was almost agreeing with you until I saw that this commentary is a bunch of nutjob, religious right bs”

    “In this town you are surrounded by women that are over-worked, under-paid and face discrimination every day.”

    And a big thank-you to this site’s token left-wing bitter hags…for proving the article’s point better than its author could have.

  • Andy says:

    Good points Cassy,

    One thing I would add is how feminists actually encourage rape and domestic violence with their constant putting down of the traditional father. For feminists, it seems the only good husbands/fathers are wusses who let their wives wear the pants in the marriage. When fatherhood is not considered the pinnacle of manliness in a society, the boys will just say “to hell with it”, and leave many young boys without fathers. These boys see their role models in thugs and gansters, who end up being most likely to be rapists and woman beaters.

  • Jay says:

    “I’ll have to take exception with this whole article only because you counter acted yourself in #6. You do the exact same thing “painting with a broad brush” all so called fascist feminist. Kinda blew the whole argument for me.”

    Surely there’s a vast difference between saying “All women want X” and saying “Everyone who is a member of this social movement wants X”. A social movement is defined by a set of goals. One joins the organization or adopts the title if he or she agrees with those goals. But one is born a woman, and while women as a group may tend to one idea or another, it is clear that “all women” do not agree about much of anything.

    (My wife and I used to have a little gag exchange: She’d say, “You mean all think alike”, and I’d reply, “Yeah, well you women don’t think the same thing from one minute to another.”)

  • Tennwriter says:

    You don’t support religious right bs, eh, Ming? Well, I don’t support atheist left drug -induced delusions. I do support Reality. And Reality is God exists, and He gave some rules for our own good. You can rebel against biology, against Reality, against the History of the millions of dead killed by Atheist Leftists, and against God. That btw, is the definition of insanity, rebelling against Reality.

    Well done, Cassy, well done.

  • Very educational. I took Women’s Studies in college. Actually studied with Andrea Dworkin and Catherine McKinnon, and argued at the Minneapolis City Council with them for a statute criminalizing production of snuff films. So I am a feminist. Because to me, really, feminism means loving women as they were created by God (as people with a special role to play in life, just as I have a special role, and it’s part of my maturation that I have to seek out that role and follow it). I love them because they were created by God, and I am commanded by Christ to love them as myself, not just as much as I feel like it. And I try to, and with God’s help I do, as I try to love my fellow man. And that was the reason I demanded that ordinance be passed. Actually, my own alderperson, a nun, heard my argument, changed her vote, and it passed by one vote.

    But the feminist movement does not focus on individual women’s lives (protecting people as we tried to do in Minneapolis–Don Fraser vetoed the statute, to avoid lawsuits–is good). Women’s Studies is an immature, outsider discipline just like Chicano Studies, American Indian Studies, and Black Studies (and Asian Studies, too, wherever they are allowed to exist). Don’t get me wrong, I actually wrote a requirement at the University of Minnesota for Liberal Arts Students to take at least two classes in one of these areas to graduate–the Cultural Pluralism Requirement. But they haven’t done their homework, they fail to understand and accept the basic achievement of our American Constitution and the basis for our Independence–they are fixated on attacking these things, tearing them down, and thus attacking and actually to a large degree destroying, America.

    And feminism actually is killing jobs in America today. Other countries where people are more sensible are eating our lunch economically. Illegal affirmative action programs are an example of feminists (and some of their apparently non-feminist friends) engage in N. 7, Sanctioning Victimhood. Contrary to U.S. Supreme Court holdings, these programs foist on men (and women) that women have been “vicitimized” at companies and in job categories where their is no history of discrimination! In my campaign I am saying that is a job-killer. Rational, effective companies cannot operate here in the U.S. under these circumstances. So they go overseas, where such silliness that passes as “law” will not hound them, there are people there truly grateful to work, hard! Back in the early ’60s I would never have imagined how deviously sex could have been used to destroy America.

  • Matt says:

    Abortion is sanctified because it prevents the undesirables from multiplying.

    It’s negative eugenics. So, the feminists who celebrate it are actually helping to reduce the population of it’s lower classes and those with less genetic refinement.

    It’s a great reply to a pro-“choice” individual. “I support abortion, after all, who’s gonna pay for all those black babies!” Then watch their face drop, and realize they are doing the work of fascists.

  • Anon says:

    Ferdinand Bardamu has graded Cassy’s essay for how well she really gets it.

    The score : 4 out of 8.

    Read it here.

    She gets it as far as denigrating motherhood, etc., but is completely clueless about the contract between the sexes, the Venusian Arts, and how conservatives are too cowardly to fight for real issues, and thus obsess over non-issues like gay marriage, or done deals like abortion.

  • Anon says:

    If a man is going out of his way to be chivalrous towards a women, it’s because he respects her, it’s because he sees value in her, and it’s because he wants to show that he is worthy of her.

    Such a man is a loser, and the women he opens doors for are busy writing love letters to serial killers who kill women.

    A chivalrous man is a man who women are not attracted to (despite what they say). Men who know how to attract women know better than to be chivalrous.

    Women value the drug dealer and pick-up artist more than the chivalrous engineer.

  • Anon says:

    I repeat – women are NOT attracted to a chivalrous man (despite what they say).

    A chivalrous man ends up being a needy pedestalizer who gets no action, like Andy.

    The suave, dominant, and teasing man is the one who gets action, as any man who actually gets action will attest to.

    Cassy wants the chivalry of the 19th century, but does not want to perform the duties women had to do for men in the 19th century. Chivalry only applies when women did not have the rights that they have today. You can’t have it both ways, baby.

  • Men are gentlemen when women are truly ladies.

    Today’s women and men both deserve each other, to some degree, both feminists and non-feminists, conservatives and liberals.

    Look, I’m not here to preach but there are things that people should consider. Anyone interested in reading something potentially life changing, first, check out Charles and Jenny Upton’s “Shadow of the Rose” as good reading for the demise of the true spiritual essence of romantic love among the West.

    For Western couples honesty truly interested in the religious and spiritual aspects of romantic love – the things that underlay original chivalry and that alone can resurrect proper balance of gender and sex relations here – Charles and Jenny Upton pose provocative questions.

    They discuss the original ideas and legacy of romantic love that formed the basis for chivalry in the West, things mostly forgotten. They show the actual religious basis far more in depth than most pseudo-Christian writers today.

    Charles and Jenny write about the soul of chivalry and romance as it once existed but hasn’t in over 200 years, back when it was truly informed by real spiritual and religious values.

    Second, again ladies are not ladies and do not deserve chivalry, and men today are not gentlemen and do not deserve ladies, both are coarse, vulgar, and common and so far away from the “conservative” ideas they claim they represent that it’s not even funny.

    Bear with me, read this slowly, and at least understand what I’m saying before jumping the gun.
    Look, it’s simple

    Women who want the values of a high age, like the benefits of chivalry, without being Ladies of high value, are deluded.

    Men who want the values of a high and moral age, and to be treated by their ladies as gentlemen, without the values of nobility and bearing and manliness that once characterized true gentlemen, are deluded.

    Ladies without ladies essential virtues, who strut in public or on beaches displaying themselves like the lowest class of women (and who see no harm in this) – who actually display more of their flesh – and see nothing wrong with it – than prostitutes and slave women of yore, do not understand. They are not lady’s and do not deserve a lady’s essential respect and deference from gentlemen

    Men without gentlemen’s essential virtues, who curse, behave with vulgarity, sit around and zone out on sports and porn, swill peasant and serf drinks like beer, excuse their private philandering, are excited and proud when their women go out with them dressed “sexy”, tattoos peeping out of swatches of exposed flesh, bosom partially bared and displayed like a tavern girl, are not gentlemen and do not deserve a lady’s respect

    People on such conservative blogs make Islam out to be the enemy, when everything wrong with their societies, if you get past the lies and misrepresentations of a few polemicists and go to the true in depth writings of Islam, the real sharia (not the barbarian caricture made of it by neo-cons and paid mossad operatives, and there is proof for this) represents the most sublime high distilled values of things writen of even in the bible, put into practice.

    The West has been in bad shape for 200 years.

    The cultural rot in the West – that westerners, mind you, have transmitted to the entire world, was foreseen over 100 years ago by the French thinker Rene Guenon who even back then pointed that what Western conservatives, much less than liberals, thought of as enlightened was really degenerate and would slide the entire world into a mess.

    Several Western thinkers of his age pointed out the degeneracy of the West, and the fact that Islam was superior to the West of their age in terms of it’s values. Titus burkhardt, Martin Lings, even Julius Evola made one or two observations, and many others.

    Today’s “conservatives” are not true conservatives, they represent values seen as degenerate by their ancestors.

    Modern “Conservatives” love to point the finger at Islam and pretend, to make up for their own inadequacies, that somehow Muslims pose a threat to the West.

    They are not even true conservatives, rather pseudo conservatives, their values and mores are degenerate compared to the old conservatives of the West from past centuries, and typically represent the values of common under classes, the slave and serf classes of the old West. What even the best conservatives are pushing today would have been seen as degenerate.

    How many “Christian conservative” anti-feminist women parade themselves in public in ways that would have been shameful even 150 years ago, and yet somehow manage to miss the essential linkage between their own personal lives and the rot they justly decry.
    How many Christian conservative, military men, posting on these blogs also have values they have not examined that are secretly and privately undermining their own families without even realizing it?

    This isn’t to wag the finger – God knows ALL of us need help – – and I speak to myself and I condemn myself first. The door is open to God’s help if we try, but it is a warning – before pointing the finger at the speck in other’s eyes, take care to look at the log in yours.

    The warning, is stop pretending that the other is worse than us, you, I, in everyone’s case the problem starts with our own unexamined assumptions and behavior.

    Be the change you want to see, change yourself, if you hate feminism and what it’s done to the world, look at your own modes of dress, behavior, mores, values, and speech.

    If you hate the ravages of liberalism on your society so too look at yourself. Change yourself, and encourage those you love, and your communities.
    Stop blaming Muslims, or immigrants, when the source of the rot is in your midst – it is your heart, all of our hearts

    What you people claim Islam represents is just a caricature drawn by a few neo-conservatives, presented by agit propagandists, and at worst represents Muslim communities thrown into incredible disarray by 2 centuries of attack. At one time the West’s elite openly acknowledged Muslim’s mores and standards and ideas, after all, and much of what people think of is “western” were openly borrowed from Muslims, this is history not revisionism, for those who care to do their home work.

  • Glenn says:

    I like the list. Women should have to go through a litmus test,(as well as men). Women should strive to be independently strong and abhor fascist men. Men should strive to be independently strong and abhor fascist women. Wether a person seeks independence is their own business as well as their personal beliefs on abortion and premarital sex.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead