In New Hampshire, two dads showed up to their daughters’ high school soccer game wearing pink wristbands with “XX” printed on them—the genetic shorthand for female. They weren’t shouting or holding pitchforks. They were simply and silently pushing back against a transgender biological male playing on the girls’ team.
But silence wasn’t golden. It was harassment, apparently.
Their actions at the game shortly followed a federal court ruling that blocked the Granite State from enforcing a law (HB 1205) that “prohibits biological males from participating in female athletics,” but applied only to the two male athletes who sued for the right to “try out for, practice with, compete with, and play on” girls’ teams, not every male who identifies as a girl. – Just The News
A federal judge, Steven McAuliffe, sided with the school district, which had banned the men from school grounds, claiming their “demeaning and harassing assertion” was too much for fragile minds to handle. The message was loud and clear: If you state the obvious—that girls are girls—you’re out.
By letting a New Hampshire school district ban parents from wearing “XX” wristbands at their daughters’ soccer games to silently protest male participation, calling the female symbol a “demeaning and harassing assertion” in that context, U.S. District Judge Steven McAuliffe may have doomed the political viability of gender identity-based athletics policies. – Just The News
Calling a female symbol a demeaning and harassing assertion is rich coming from the judge, especially when boys are insisting they’re girls. It’s a circular argument—where reality is twisted to fit an agenda, and common sense is tossed aside in the process.
The dads, Kyle Fellers and Anthony Foote, argued they were standing up for fairness in girls’ sports. The judge saw it differently. Intent didn’t matter; perception did. And in this upside-down era, hurt feelings outweigh First Amendment rights. And reality.
Let that sink in: The symbol for being female is now considered offensive. Not because it’s vulgar, or violent, or threatening—but because it’s true.
A judge ruled that two dads can’t wear pink wristbands with an XX on them.
The judge is using hate speech principles & applying them to biological reality. The judge is equating the XX with a swastika or another symbol of hate. But reality isn’t hate. https://t.co/iC6PycU7ac
— Jennifer Sey (@JenniferSey) April 15, 2025
After I hit publish on this post, I’ll be heading over to pick up my h*te speech merch.
But this isn’t just about wristbands. It’s about shutting down dissent. If saying “XX” is labeled hate speech, then biology itself is on trial. And it’s much more than free speech. It’s about the insanity of allowing boys to compete against girls in sports. I know, I sound like a broken record.
In July 2024, former New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu signed House Bill 1205, banning transgender girls from competing in girls’ sports from grades 5 through 12. The law insists athletes play based on the sex they were assigned at birth. Seems pretty clear-cut, right? But two male competitors are now suing the state, claiming the law violates their rights under Title IX. Yes, you read that right—boys are perverting Title IX to hijack women’s sports and cry foul when they’re told they can’t. It’s a disgusting abuse of the system, and it’s time to call it what it is. All because they call themselves transgender girls. And you’ve been conditioned to accept these terms—transgender girls—as science, fact, and, somehow, as real girls.
NO!
While these fathers are being treated like domestic threats for wearing wristbands, the male athlete in question is still competing while a legal challenge to the state’s transgender sports ban plays out in court.
If Kyle Fellers and Anthony Foote are looking for a next step after all the media attention, here’s an idea: why not run for school board? After all, it’s the school boards that created and continue to enforce these policies. They’ve already shown they have the guts to stand up for what’s right—now it’s time to take that fight to the policy-making table. If the system won’t listen to concerned parents, maybe it’s time to put concerned parents in charge. Isn’t that how change starts?
The United Kingdom is apparently waking up from this nightmare with their latest Supreme Court ruling that only biological and not trans women meet the definition of a woman under their equality laws. When are we going to snap out of it?
Feature Image: Created in Canva Pro
Anna A says: I wonder if the female symbol which is a circle and a cross on the bottom and with double “X” on top, appearing to x it out would be acceptable.
mort main says: Ignorance abounds…in the judiciary.
SCOTTtheBADGER says: It isn’t ” the sex assigned at birth ” it’s the sex you are, and always have been, and always will be. I get tired of ” assigned ” nonsense, as I know you do as well.
Cameron says: I want one guy to show up with the XX armbands and another one to show up with troon flag armbands and have a third person recording what happens.
4 Comments