Creep Joe Biden went to the Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) Presidential Library and Museum in Austin, Texas to celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the passage of the Civil Rights Act. Biden used this speaking opportunity to suggest term limits for Supreme Court Justices and to tell a really creepy motel story about shaving cream and a towel. The Democrats are currently trying to make “weird” trend for Vice Presidential Candidate Senator J.D. Vance. They might want to shut Joe up for a couple days to make that work.
It’s been less than a week since Joe Biden gave his “Not Running” speech and told us NOTHING. That’s not near enough time for us to forget how weird Creepy Joe really truly, no lie is.
In the meantime, because of the “cat lady” remark, a joke about Mountain Dew and a rumor that Vance wears “guyliner”, the Dems have been calling J.D. Vance “weird”:
“It is the weirdest thing to me. Democrats say it is racist to believe — well, they say it’s racist to do anything,” Vance told the crowd. “I had a Diet Mountain Dew yesterday and I’m sure they’re going to call that racist too.”
“It’s good,” he said, laughing at his own joke, which appeared to land with a single clap from the crowd.
A few days later, the campaign shared a “backstage” video showing the “ton of crap” to eat and drink – including a stash of Diet Mountain Dew.
snip-
Jokes and online speculation about whether Vance wears eyeliner have spilled out into the presidential race.
TikTok artist and drag queen June Rogers has even started a series of makeup tutorials based around achieving Vance’s look.
What idiots Dems are! He is a Marine. There is no expiration date on that. Marines are impervious to heat or cold, can suffer through anything and eat crayons. That’s a level of weird that is undefinable. Dems should give it up.
Meanwhile, Kamala Harris let Joe fly Air Force One to Austin so that he could mumble and drool about Civil Rights, the Supreme Court and shaving cream, no lie. Here is the speech from Mushmouth Biden:
Notice how quickly Biden segued from LBJ and civil rights to LBJ nominating Thurgood Marshall to time to take on the Supreme Court. From UPI:
“In a great society, no one should be left behind. It’s time for us to come to see that every American gets a decent break and a fair chance to make good,” Biden said in remarks at the Lyndon Johnson Presidential Library in Austin, Texas.
The Civil Rights Act was signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964 and outlawed segregation in business establishments, public schools and other public places, while prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The act also established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
“A defining moment that has since opened doors for all Americans regardless of race, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religion, national origin. Together with the Voting Rights Act and the Fair Housing Act, these three landmark laws he signed are remarkable,” Biden said.“Now, we live in a different era. In recent years, extreme opinions that the Supreme Court has handed down have undermined long-established civil rights principles and protections.”
“In 2022, the court overrode Roe v. Wade and the right to choose. It had been the law of the land for 50 years,” Biden said. “And most recently and most shockingly, the Supreme Court established in Trump v. The United States a dangerous precedent. They ruled as you know that the president of the United States has immunity for potential crimes he may have committed while in office.”
Given all the weird stuff Biden has pulled in office, he should be on his hands and knees grateful for that immunity. The Supreme Court changes aren’t happening yet. While Vox likes the idea of sticking it to the court, even they know that it t’aint happening:
But if you’re hoping these ideas will rein in a Court that’s essentially become the policymaking arm of the Republican Party, expect to be disappointed. Amending the Constitution is virtually impossible — it requires approval from three-quarters of the states — so Biden’s proposal to amend the Constitution to overturn the presidential immunity decision in Trump v. United States (2024) is almost certainly dead on arrival. Similarly, the term limits proposal is at odds with Article III of the Constitution, which provides that justices “shall hold their offices during good behaviour,” language that’s historically been understood to protect judges unless they engage in serious misconduct. So that proposal is equally dead.
Proposing a constitutional amendment is not entirely useless. By proposing two amendments targeting the Supreme Court, Biden makes clear that his Democratic Party opposes much of the Court’s recent behavior, much like President George W. Bush used a proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage in 2004 to communicate to voters that Republicans were the anti-gay party. But Bush’s amendment was never enacted, and Biden’s amendments almost certainly won’t become law, either.
I promised you shaving cream, and swear to God, and I am going to give you shaving cream:
"Not a joke. Here’s the deal… Eight by ten bathroom, towel around me shaving cream on my face.”https://t.co/0FByK5rCrD
— Daisy (@SavagWm) July 29, 2024
What grown ass man answers a motel door in just a towel with shaving cream on his face? Joe Biden. The same man who swam naked in front of female agents while he was Vice President, that’s who. Weird.
Featured Image: Darleen Click for Victory Girls
Chad King says: I wonder if he mentioned who voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964:
House:
63% of Democrats voted for the law
80% of Republicans voted for the law
Senate
69% of Democrats voted for the law
82% of Republicans voted for the law
Even allowing for the subsequent party switching of southern Democrats to the Republican Party, it looks like the Republicans favored civil rights legislation at least as much as did the Democrats. The liberal crew that claims that the southern Democrats changed party allegiance because they opposed civil rights are illogical. Why would they switch to a party that supported the Civil Rights Act? If I recall correctly, many of the southern Democrats abandoned the Democrat party because it was soft on crime and big on an expansion of the federal government–but I could be wrong.
Scott says: Please Don’t forget LBJs famous statement when he was trying to get the dems on board enough to pass it. I’m sure Robert Byrd didn’t join in, but across the board, it was a political calculation, not an altruistic one.
Kevin says: VG is just like the Malignant Tumor who is too old to figure out who he’s running against. I applaud your attacks on Biden. Focus the electorate on Biden. Keep up the good work. Come November 5, when the electorate enters the voting booth, they’ll think twice about voting for Biden. Shockingly, when they see the ballot in the voting booth, they won’t see Biden’s name on the ballot. Just a choice between an old, decrepit, weird guy speaking in non-sensical sentences who only has one emotion … rage, and a woman 20 years his junior who is articulate, forceful in her communication, who has the ability to smile and project hope and healing for the future. Elections are about the future; not the past. I attribute that statement mainly to republicans who are unable to get the Malignant Tumor at the top of the ticket to grasp that concept.
Scott says: Wow Kevin, there are so many adjectives that can be applied to Heels Up Harris, but “articulate” the women has never completed a single sentence that makes sense, she speaks in nothing but circular word salad mash-ups… You really do need to seek help!
Turtler says: Well well, if it isn’t Reject Sale Roehm, “Honorary Gigolo” in lieu of being Leftist Stormtrooper.
“VG is just like the Malignant Tumor who is too old to figure out who he’s running against. I applaud your attacks on Biden.”
This is funny, considering how Trump isn’t the one that demonstrated key senility. Moreover, Biden is crucial to Kamala’s story. She would never have gotten anywhere close to the Vice Presidency had Biden not picked her as a “DIE Hire” meant to curry votes and intimidate the party bosses from replacing him (not counting that things might go so wrong they ultimately would). Without Biden, Kamala would just be known as a hypocritical, unprincipled DA and failed politician who largely slept her way to the top and arrested thousands of people for marijuana use at the same time she claimed to have been using (at least later, when it became convenient to present herself as pro-legalization).
She was supposed to be Biden’s Lieutenant and 2IC. She was supposed to be one heartbeat away from the Presidency. She was supposed to be Border Czar and any other task that Biden (or his puppetmasters) put her to. That she is so utterly devoid of accomplishments or merit is one of the greatest indictments against the both of them as well as against your political machine.
And a comprehensive indictment means going after both.
“Focus the electorate on Biden. Keep up the good work.”
I don’t want the electorate focusing TOO MUCH on Biden, but they absolutely should focus on the corrupt, idiotic, nepotistic pupil of Robert Byrd who decided to put Kamala in a position of authority she did not deserve. A position of authority NOBODY SANE believed she deserved given her track record in California and abysmally poor treatment of her support staff, but which she was put to anyway. It also speaks to her role in other Biden era disasters like the Southern Border and Bidenomics.
“Come November 5, when the electorate enters the voting booth, they’ll think twice about voting for Biden. Shockingly, when they see the ballot in the voting booth, they won’t see Biden’s name on the ballot.”
Except Biden is on the ballot, even if not directly. His legacy is, and Kamala is part of his legacy.
“Just a choice between an old, decrepit, weird guy speaking in non-sensical sentences who only has one emotion … rage, and a woman 20 years his junior who is articulate, forceful in her communication, who has the ability to smile and project hope and healing for the future. ”
This is an almost comic inversion of reality. Kamala is not very articulate even when speaking from a script or teleprompter, as we saw when her Presidential Campaign blew up the last time. “Forceful in her communication” she certainly can be that, especially when treating her support staff as if they were serfs or peons who cannot look her in the eye (literally something she demanded) rather than the volunteers and paid professionals they are. And Trump is the one who is able to advocate for a hopeful future (in some ways I wonder if he is too optimistic).
So Kamala can smile. Great. So can a dime store wood cutout. She can also cackle, usually at repulsively inappropriate times.
“Elections are about the future; not the past. ”
Cute witticism, shame it is nonsensical. THE PAST EXISTS, THE FUTURE DOES NOT YET. And while past performance is no surety of future accomplishment, it is at least a decent hint. And Kamala’s past corruption, abuse of nepotism, abuse of her subordinates and attempts to gaslight a continent about her ever being Border Czar are all just some of the bits of ammo we have against her.
“I attribute that statement mainly to republicans who are unable to get the Malignant Tumor at the top of the ticket to grasp that concept.”
There’s nothing wrong with grasping a concept that is blatantly, provably false. But it can be written slickly and sounds superficially smart until you actually think of it for more than five seconds, which is about the limits of your intellectual capacity.
Jack says: a woman 20 years his junior who is articulate
a woman 20 years his junior who is articulate, forceful in her communication, who has the ability to smile and project hope and healing for the future?
it is certainly NOT Kamala Harris,
Jack says: Darn it can’t edit. I didn’t mean to double copy the top sentence.
7 Comments