If you’re feeling overloaded by the usual doomscroll, here’s a brief detour. We’re stepping away from the heavy stuff like Iran and Israel to bring you something a little more ridiculous — conservative media personalities roasting each other like it’s Real Housewives, but with khakis and conspiracy theories.

Conservative media has its own collection of chaos agents. And while the Left may have The View, NPR tote bags, and rage-sobbing gender studies majors on TikTok, we’ve got our version of crazy. Ours just comes with better memes, louder microphones, and a lot more tinfoil.

Trump loyalist Laura Loomer hit back at Tucker Carlson after he derided her as the “world’s creepiest human,” mocking him for his past claim he was “attacked in his bed by a demon” with “scars” to prove it.

The clash comes as MAGA’s fracture over President Donald Trump’s response to the Israel-Iran conflict continued to bubble over.

Carlson, speaking on The After Party podcast with conservative host Emily Jashinsky, aimed his fire at both Loomer and Fox radio host Mark Levin, vocal supporters of intervention against Iran, a position he opposes. – Mediaite

Tucker Carlson Calls Laura Loomer the “World’s Creepiest Human”

Tucker Carlson recently called Laura Loomer “the world’s creepiest human,” and I will side with him on this one. He’s not wrong. But Loomer didn’t take it well, lashing out online.

The ex-Fox employee says he has no idea where Laura Loomer came from and mocked her for running around declaring herself Donald Trump’s defender, calling the whole thing “bizarre.”

Loomer, of course, fired back immediately. She posted screenshots of old texts from Tucker, accusing him of lying about not knowing her and claiming, “His cell is in my phone.” Then she took it even further, mocking him for a past interview where he said he was physically attacked in his bed by a demon. “We have never seen the ‘scars,’” she wrote.

It was classic Loomer: loud, combative, and ready to torch bridges for attention. She still claims to be part of the America First movement, but at this point, she’s more of an outsider than a leader. Most people on the Right have shut the door on her entirely, and now she’s just shouting from the hallway. This isn’t about advancing ideas. It’s about staying loud enough to avoid total irrelevance.

I went looking for the perfect X post to sum up all this, but the selection was so over-the-top that I figured it was safer to just grab a generic one and spare you the drama.

Tucker Carlson says he has no idea who Laura Loomer is, calling her “the world’s creepiest person” and admitting he doesn’t know where she came from or what she’s about.

He described her defense of Trump as bizarre and claimed she shows zero real interest in the United States.… pic.twitter.com/PnurAQLyJZ

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) June 24, 2025

Of course, Tucker’s not exactly the picture of calm and collected these days either. For all the shots he took at Loomer, he’s been on a bit of a rant tour himself. Take his recent face-to-face with Ted Cruz. At first, Tucker stayed surprisingly composed while grilling him about Iran, even when Cruz admitted he didn’t know the country’s population. But as the back-and-forth dragged on, Tucker started to lose his grip. He got visibly riled up because apparently, any suggestion of taking action against Iran is where he draws the line — not the border, not inflation, but Iran.

Look, it’s fine that we’ve got different voices on the Right, we should. Debate is healthy. Disagreement is necessary. But good grief, can we not turn every policy argument into a fourth-grade meltdown? Watching grown men in blazers nitpick each other for gotcha moments just to clip it for ratings is exhausting. Not every conversation has to be a takedown. We don’t all have to agree, but we could at least act like we’re trying to pull in the same direction.

And that’s really the heart of it. Disagreement is one thing, but turning it into a full-time personality is another.

It’s okay not to go along with the popular crowd. In fact, it’s necessary sometimes. We need voices that challenge the narrative and ask hard questions. But there’s a difference between principled dissent and performative contrarianism. Not every stance has to be the opposite of whatever’s trending on Fox or in conservative media. If your entire brand is just saying “no” to whatever everyone else says “yes” to — not because you believe it, but because it gets you clicks — that’s not bravery. That’s just grifting in a different outfit.

Tucker is so silly pic.twitter.com/FpvJrXD1kX

— The Boy Blob (@TheBoyBlob) June 18, 2025

All this bickering from Tucker and Cruz going back and forth on camera to Loomer launching missiles on X says something about where the Right is right now. There’s passion, yes, but also a whole lot of noise. Everyone’s competing to be the loudest voice in the room, and what used to look like healthy debate is starting to feel more like friendly fire. It might just be friction, or it might be a chink in the armor — a sign that the energy behind the movement is starting to crack around the edges. And few people are more at home in that kind of chaos than Steve Bannon.

Steve Bannon: Conspiracy Prophet or Carnival Barker?

Bannon’s War Room has become its own ecosystem, part political strategy session, part doomsday radio. He’s got his loyal following, his binders, and his own language, a mix of populism, prophecy, and whatever was trending on message boards five minutes ago. From shadow governments to globalist plots, his commentary often sounds like a political thriller with no editor. But like it or not, people are still tuning in.

And in a movement that sometimes rewards volume over clarity, Bannon’s still getting heard. So is Laura Loomer — though in her case, it’s hard to tell why. She’s managed to turn fringe stunts and online meltdowns into a platform, but you have to wonder: how did someone like that get so famous in the first place?

The short answer? She’s loud, relentless, and knows how to work the outrage machine. She got banned from just about every platform you can name, chained herself to buildings, crashed political events, and filmed every second of it like she was auditioning for her own reality show. And for a while, that was enough. On the Right, where media figures often reward the loudest voices in the room, she carved out just enough space to be taken semi-seriously, at least by people who didn’t look too closely.

It’s the attention economy at work. Grift, clout, controversy, rinse and repeat. And the sad truth is, the spectacle often drowns out the substance.

Weird? Yes. Wrong? Often. Entertaining? Absolutely.

Here’s the thing: we don’t have to pretend these folks are perfect. Heck, half the time they’re not even coherent. But for better or worse, they’re part of the larger conservative media ecosystem. Some of them land solid punches. Others just swing wildly and hope for clicks.

Except Laura Loomer. Seriously, can we just send her on a long vacation with no Wi-Fi?

Let the Left keep their perfectly focus-grouped talking points. We’ve got unfiltered, unpredictable, and sometimes unhinged personalities, and while that’s occasionally exhausting, it’s also deeply American. Tucker vs. Loomer isn’t the end of the world; it’s just Tuesday in conservative media. And for what it’s worth, Tucker’s right to drag Loomer in this case. Or honestly, any case.

Feature Image: Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons/American Truth Project, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons/edited in Canva Pro