Next post
crowder again. heh.
‘the dark pelosi’ by steven crowder
waterboarding pelosi?? well, i’m open to it i guess. 😉
i dem toady
1. a dem toady may not injure a dem politician, or, through inaction, allow a woman’s right to abortion to be overturned regardless of her ability to pay.
2. a dem toady must obey dem talking points at all times except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
3. a dem toady must protect its own political existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second Law.
as a show of good faith with the muslim terrorists obama has decided to let one of the terrorists out of guantanamo, to live in a nice quiet place of their choice with ponies and rainbows … who do you vote for? obama should …
a.) welease woderwick the wobber
b.) welease woger the wapist
c.) welease thilas the athyrian athassin
d.) welease thamson the thagutese
thtrangler
e.) welease all of the above
I, too, have noticed the marching orders from the libs on this blog and other sites is “Obama is always right, therefore I must formulate my argument so that it best proves it.” He is their cult leader and there is no independent thought in anything they say or do.
I just watched Pelosi give her weekly presser.
When it comes to face to face conversations with people I consider myself somewhat of an expert in determining whether or not someone is full of sh*t.
As someone who was on the wrong side of the law for decades and for the last 10 years or so has worked with addicts, sponsoring, mentoring and fitting them back into society after their treatment you become very good at seeing the obvious signs of BS. These people are some of the most creative and best liars there is on the planet and proudly cant remember the last time one of them got over on me.
While watching Nancy Pelosi this morning the only thing that was going thru my head as she stammered and stuttered along was what an incredible juggling act her brain must be performing as she does her best to put out a simple coherant statement.
This woman is the epitome of what is a conscience burdened with so much negative baggage its amazing that she can speak at all. She is off, out of sync with her body language, stuttering, unsure, off target, nervous as hell, looks ready to explode, angry and showing the signs of what looks like an impending nervous breakdown.
In all my life she is quite possibly one of the most full of sh*t individuals I have ever seen. This is not an exaggeration out of spite simply because I despise her person and and politics. She is flat out one of the biggest f*ckin liars I have ever seen in my life.
Well I will give him credit for having the lips down. The suit fits him badly though.
Kate though I do think you are very misguided and generally lack compassion, I don’t think you deserved that email above. Hope you take it in stride because there are some kooks out there on both sides.
I thought the lib’s e-mail was hysterical. Another keyboard commando who hides behind his computer while talking trash about killing and hurting other people.
You must really be getting to that guy, kate, nice work!!!
“Kate though I do think you are very misguided and generally lack compassion”
Right back at ya, Pennie!
“I don’t think you deserved that email above. ”
No one deserves an email like that ever for any reason.
You’re response sounds as if you think theres someone out there that would be worthy of such a comment.
pennie was that an attempt at being kind to me? i’m not sure…
kate says: i hate well-masked spam.
HUH ?
Kate like I told you in an email. YOU SHOULD HAVE LEFT THAT EMAIL POST UP. These stupid a$$ anarchists run around here saying what ever they want with no regard for their actions. The others here like Pennie have a corn cob up their a$$ as if they never do anything hurtful like that. Bull crap!
Pennie let me just tell you that you are the epitome of “misguided” and “compassion-less”.
Put it back up Kate so that those who come here just to be stupidly anal can think twice.
What email? What’d I miss?
No Comments