Previous post
The Muslim call to prayer can now be broadcast without requiring permits, Mayor Adams announced in New York City.
Now, you can hear the call to worship every Friday around lunchtime and every evening during the month-long Islamic holiday called Ramadan.
Today @NYCMayor and @NYPDPC Caban stood together with Muslim faith leaders to roll out a new initiative that will make it easier for Mosques and houses of worship to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer on Fridays and during Ramadan.
Learn more: https://t.co/1IYsSbdXLN pic.twitter.com/FKqHzLsTbG
— NYC Mayor’s Office (@NYCMayorsOffice) August 29, 2023
Oh, isn’t that nice, all in the name of inclusion, tolerance, and acceptance? It’s the good Christian thing to do. It’s a good neighborly thing to do. We are a melting pot, after all. No? And Toni, way back in 2015, wrote about how Barack Obama “studied the Koran in Jakarta and has called the Muslim call to prayer one of the “prettiest sounds on Earth.”
The Adhan, popularly known as the Islamic call to public prayer, can now be publicly broadcast by mosques in New York City without a permit every Friday and throughout Ramadan under a new initiative launched by Mayor Eric Adams and NYPD Commissioner Edward A. Caban. But not everyone is happy about it. – The Christian Post
America may not have been founded as a Christian nation right off the bat when the Mayflower swayed its way toward the Massachusetts shores, but it did carry a group of God-fearing Christians.
Ethics and values derived from the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures have shaped this nation from its inception, but without being forcefully imposed on anyone. – Faith & Liberty Trail
Christianity is the most prevalent religion in America, barely though. Recent stats show that only a little over half the population considers themselves Christian, approximately 63% and that is just identifying as Christian. Church membership is lower than that, especially since the pandemic. Remember all the church closings?
But this news from Mayor Adams seems like the next logical move in our borderless country. In the olden days, immigrants came here legally and assimilated. That is no longer the way.
There is a new way. Open borders, along with tolerance, acceptance, and inclusion. And diversity and equity.
“For too long, there has been a feeling that our communities were not allowed to amplify their calls to prayer,” said Mayor Adams. “Today, we are cutting red tape and saying clearly that mosques and houses of worship are free to amplify their call to prayer on Fridays and during Ramadan without a permit necessary. We want our brothers and sisters of Muslim faith to know that they are free to live their faith in New York City because, under the law, we will all be treated equally. Our administration is proud to finally get this done.” – NYC.gov
And, of course, New York City isn’t the first city to do this. Earlier this year, Minneapolis did the same with all five daily calls to prayer over a loudspeaker. There is nothing wrong with a bit of liberty of Sharia Law seeping in, right? Freedom of religion and all. Head nod towards OG Dearborn, Michigan too
Nothing wrong with that, right? I’ll repeat it, all in the name of tolerance, acceptance, and love. Seems right and sound on the surface.
Of course, we must show love and tolerance to our brothers and sisters. Yes! I sincerely mean it.
However, I do take a pause here to remember hearing these same sentiments regarding sexual preference, and now we are mutilating and abusing children and allowing men to pose as women while usurping our spaces like it is as normal as
But I digress.
Maybe I can point you to a book titled The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam instead. The author is Douglas Murray.
Murray contends that European civilization as it has historically existed will not survive. He explores two factors in explaining this: The first is the combination of mass migration of new peoples into Europe together with its low birth rates; The second is what Murray describes as “the fact that… at the same time Europe lost faith in its beliefs, traditions, and legitimacy”. – Wikipedia
And I have to ask, are we following this model? Just like Europe, we are close to losing our faith, beliefs, traditions, and legitimacy, as Murray writes in his book. The guilt of our past makes us vulnerable. Instead of seeing what we have learned from our mistakes, we love feeling the guilt of it.
We must pick ourselves up, see what is right again, and not fear freedom and liberty.
Feature Image: Monstera/Pexels/Free Use
Are churches allowed to ring their bells without a permit? If so (and they certainly should be), then I have absolutely no problem with the adhan being sounded without one. Religious freedom is and should be universal. The bigger travesty is that this was a permit issue in the first place.
“Shariah Law” is redundant.
I agree to a point Hate, where i don’t is that church bells, (when not used to denote what time of day, which has nothing to do with religion) are usually either very short, or songs that may or may not be religious in nature, while the muslim call to prayer is loud and long, as well as being vocal, vs. instrumental (not that he last part makes a difference in this context), and as such would seem to be far more disruptive.
This. Church bells are not a good comparison.
A chant at 10 decibels over the ambient noise shouting:
“God is Great! God is Great! God is Great! God is Great!
I bear witness that there is no god except the One God.
I bear witness that there is no god except the One God.
I bear witness that Christ is the Savior of the World!
I bear witness that Christ is the son of God.
Hurry to the prayer. Hurry to the prayer.
Hurry to salvation. Hurry to salvation.
God is Great! God is Great!
There is no god except the One God.”
That would be equivalent to the adhan. I suspect some folks would have a problem with that.
I wouldn’t like this, but I can’t imagine what it would be like to live in the city with all the noise already there. Think my cortisol levels would be off the charts.
I myself would prefer loud calls to prayer to the trans madness that is upon us.
Trans are proselytizing to a captive audience also.
FWIW, if anyone cares,
Captive audience doctrine:
https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/895/captive-audience
Ultimately, it shouldn’t make a bit of difference whether some folks would have a problem with it or not. Many claim to have problems with church bells, also.
The adhan isn’t necessarily louder than church bells, that depends largely on the individual muezzin and the particular bells. Both are traditional, loud, and public means of calling worshippers to prayer/service at established times of day. That one is a chant and one is instrumental is irrelevant, the comparison stands on its own and both should share equal protection under the law.
Both have been targeted by those with bias under canards such as “noise pollution” or some ridiculous ad absurdum argument that they open the door for some kind of greater harm. In either case, it’s the antithesis of this great American experiment.
Praise the Lord; praise God our savior! For each day, he carries us in his arms. Selah.
We want our brothers and sisters of Muslim faith to know that they are free to live their faith in New York City
Kind of like how they lived their faith at the World Trade Center? Or is that “different” because “reasons”?
Many mafiosos wear crosses. Are they representative of all Catholics?
Funny how principles die when they don’t align with personal bias.
I don’t recall ever hearing any government say we need to be more tolerant of Christians or Jews. All I hear is how we’re supposed to be tolerant of Muslims. The double standard is as bright as neon.
Fair enough. Lynch them all, then. No government has ever pushed for more tolerance of Jews, sure.
Our nation was founded on principles. Those principles are every bit as important (if not moreso) when their application is personally distasteful.
Lynch them all, then
Never said anything of the sort. I’m just pointing out the obvious hypocrisy of demanding tolerance for only one faith.
Nothing about this is demanding tolerance only for Muslims.
Of course religious freedom was never guaranteed by our Constitution. Catholic priests in Massachusetts were subject to execution for well over 100 years.
Of course that would be too politically incorrect to be allowed into public high school history books.
Here’s what the “Christian” community fail to recognize … any law or judicial ruling in favor of “religious” freedom is meant for ALL RELIGIONS. Federal funds going to Christian schools should also go to Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, and other religious schools. If a Christian church is allowed to have a building ten blocks from the World Trade Center then so should a Muslim specific school. If an evangelical Christian school gets federal funding then so should a conservative Madrasa school should also get funding. The Hasidic schools in NYC that were recently exposed (by a parent) to graduate people who couldn’t read English and who got funding … good for them. Religious freedom means religious freedom for all no matter their doctrine.
“Religious freedom means religious freedom for all no matter their doctrine.”
Truly a rare occasion, but I do agree with you Kevin
16 Comments