The Democrats send them a memo about words and phrases to use and the Media salutes smartly and executes. Our Carol told you yesterday about J.D. Vance and his weirdness with the Childless Cat Ladies comment. J.D. Vance is weird. Vance drinks Diet Mountain Dew too to continue the weirdness. But, Molly Jong-Fast said that Vance’s comments are all about natalism and authoritarianism. You want to talk weird.
Oh no, we’re going to keep it going https://t.co/YQJ5sGhzk5
— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) July 30, 2024
I don’t think the Left wants to get into a game of Top this Weirdness. They have us beat hands down. But, we do need to keep the weird going. Molly Jong-Fast’s parents are Royalty to the Left so they believe everything she says. However, she is intellectually blocked and myopic. Even Mediate knows she talking out of her hat:
MSNBC political analyst Molly Jong-Fast claimed that Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance just wants “more white children” despite the fact that he has three biracial children with his wife Usha Vance during a discussion on Morning Joe Tuesday.
The segment began with host Jonathan Lemire making note of data suggesting that Americans are having fewer kids and want fewer kids.
“And Molly, the stats are there: More and more Americans choosing not to have kids. Which again emphasizes why JD Vance’s comments about childless Americans childless ladies could be so politically damaging,” declared Lemire.
“Well, so what’s interesting is this is this natalism that comes from an authoritarian playbook, right? That there there need to be more white children, right? That’s the idea that there’s, you know, this is about great replacement theory racism, right?” replied Jong-Fast. “This is what this, don’t misunderstand it. For him wanting more children, he wants a certain kind of, you know, racist thing. So I would say, yeah, it’s certainly true. And attacking people for not having children is really cruel, right? Because some people can’t have children, some people, you know, want to have children and, you know, can’t, you know, miss the window. So I do think it’s it’s really just a very terrible way to go after people.”
Lemire, who also serves as the ostensibly straight-laced White House bureau chief for Politico, did not push back on Jong-Fast’s claim or even note that the rest of Vance’s nuclear family is not white.
One should do just a minimum of study before one spouts bullshite. Here she is:
Wacko on MSNBC says JD Vance wants more “white children.” Which I guess is why he married an Indian woman and has biracial kids? pic.twitter.com/ed4xuRqQlF
— Chadwick Moore (@Chadwick_Moore) July 30, 2024
That’s natalist, authoritarian and Great Replacement Theory. Bwahaha. And, “Molly Jong-Fast: Republicans want to bring women back to the 1950s” which is why both Trump and J.D. Vance are married to brilliant women:
Back to the 1950’s, no. But discussing some medically questionable issues, yes. Like what happens to leftover eggs retrived.
Mostly, I just want them to keep calling J.D. Vance weird.
Weird/ normal pic.twitter.com/FmvailbcJ8
— Coddled affluent professional (@feelsdesperate) July 29, 2024
Featured Image: Darleen Click for Victory Girls
Lloyd says: Who, but liberal, lying Dems could suggest that Rachel Levine is normal and JD is not. The Biden administration is full of foreigners, anti-Americans, alphabet people and freaks…..and, yet, they cast labels at/on JD. All done in a quest for unity. Hogwash!!
A reader says: Melania is not brilliant. For instance, there has been zero real evidence that she truly is fluent in 5 languages, including Italian. In fact, when then President Trump and Melania visited Pope Francis in Rome in May 2017, a news clip captured the pope jokingly asking Melania, in Italian, what she feeds her husband. Melania didn’t appear to understand the question until a translator repeated it in English. That would indicate she isn’t truly fluent in Italian. She also copied one of Michelle Obama’s speeches, and one can assume that a truly brilliant person would know how to write their own speech.
Vance’s wife is smart, there is no doubt about that. However, she’s also technically an “anchor baby” and considering Project 2025 and Agenda 47 want to do away with birthright citizenship, her citizenship may be in question should Trump be elected. It’s also important to note that there have been many comments in the extreme right wing sphere about her ethnicity with some being unhappy. Plus the whole emphasis on white families having priority is well known and stated often by far right white nationalists. So, sorry, conservatives and Republicans own this and you can’t pretend you don’t when it’s all over the place and pretty out in the open!
Que says: I have reviewed this short article several times and see no reference whatsoever to Melania Trump. Your TDS is so virulent that you pounced at the opportunity to dump on a woman who has done nothing to you, and who had never tried to influence foreign policy while Trump was president. Talk about a non sequitur fallacy.
Is she brilliant? The hell if I know, and neither do you. My grandparents emigrated from Eastern Europe prior to WWI, and I know they spoke German, Lithuanian, Russian, and later English, even though neither one of them had the equivalency of a high school education. Europeans tend to be multilingual, while we are not.
As for Usha Vance — what a f*cking insult to call her an “anchor baby.” Her father is an engineer and her mother is a molecular biologist — hardly the sort of immigrants who required a child born in the US in order to remain.
Finally, in case you didn’t know, the director of Project 25 just stepped down today, and the Trump campaign celebrated its demise. And while you hyperventilate over “white nationalists” and the few online right nutballs who are racist, I can tell you as a person active in my local Republican party, I know NOBODY who spews that garbage.
However, I wonder if YOU are an anti-Asian racist with your insult against Usha Vance. Yeah honey, YOU own that.
GWB says: As for Usha Vance … Her father is an engineer and her mother is a molecular biologist
Ironically, similar parental quals to those they’re touting for Kamala. Heck, she ran on the concept that she must be smart because her mother is a cancer researcher. Except her parents were apparently communists. Typical Dem/Prog projection.
Turtler says: “Melania is not brilliant.”
You know, the term Brilliant is overused to the umpteenth degree (and never more than when you are patting yourself on the bat trying to reassure yourself how smurt and rite you are and how geniuz your leaders are), so I’d actually be willing to humor that.
“For instance, there has been zero real evidence that she truly is fluent in 5 languages, including Italian.”
“Zero Real Evidence.”
Oh joy, I look forward to hearing how ‘real evidence’ is defined according to a shameless, dishonest political idiot.
” In fact, when then President Trump and Melania visited Pope Francis in Rome in May 2017, a news clip captured the pope jokingly asking Melania, in Italian, what she feeds her husband. Melania didn’t appear to understand the question until a translator repeated it in English. That would indicate she isn’t truly fluent in Italian.”
This is what idiots like you consider “real evidence.” A bonafide gotcha. Did you Google that little factoid?
Problem is, there are a few problems with this gotcha.
Firstly: The so-called Pope Francis (who has shown downright heretical tendencies) Is not a native Italian speaker either and is noted to speak the language with a distinct Italo-Argentine accent that can trip up even fluent native speakers of either Spanish or Italian.
Secondly: Melania was a SUPERMODEL, and specifically one from Slovenia. I realize people like you probably don’t know much about the world outside of your sad cuck sheds (indeed, the more I read the more I’m not sure how much you know about said sheds), but here are a few pointers.
A: Slovenia has been influenced by Italy for literal millennia, for both good and bad, and bilinguality is common.
B: The dominant languages of the Western World’s fashion circles are French, English, and Italian, in more or less that order. Melania worked in that world for literal Decades, including multiple cycles through Italy. If there were serious indications she was not fluent in Italian, WE WOULD EXPECT NO SHORTAGE OF LEFT WING FASHIONISTA “WHISTLEBLOWERS” TO COME UP AND SAY SO.
Or am I really supposed to believe the Paris-Alpine-Adriatic fashion cycle is dominated by Right Wingers?
Oh oh… but… but she had momentary trouble understanding a joke from a man speaking with an accent!
This is why you are a midwit. This is why you suck at critical thinking. You flatly do not even CONSIDER context.
“She also copied one of Michelle Obama’s speeches,”
No, she did not. Either she or the scriptwriter (depending on which you believe) copied ELEMENTS FROM one of Michelle Obama’s speeches. That’s still bad but nowhere near as bad as copying the entire speech.
“and one can assume that a truly brilliant person would know how to write their own speech.”
Assuming they have enough time and energy. Which she might not. Human civilization is based around specialization, where people who can do a certain thing better (or at least BE ASSUMED TO do such a thing) do that thing. Just because you are fluent or competent in umpteen languages doesn’t mean you are confident you can make a rousing speech in that language, much less that you can do so after fast paced travel.
So the current story (which I view as plausible) is that Melania’s scriptwriter copied some of the previous speech from Michelle Obama, and due to the time crunch that went ahead. Still bad (though i note nowhere near as bad as the Obama,s Kamala, and Biden are).
“Vance’s wife is smart, there is no doubt about that. ”
How generous of you. I am sure there is no ulterior motive whatsoever.
“However, she’s also technically an “anchor baby” and considering Project 2025 and Agenda 47 want to do away with birthright citizenship,”
Ok Dipshit, kindly specify where in Project 2025 or Agenda 47 it advocates “doing away with birthright citizenship.” Feel free to provide Quotes and Page Numbers. I’ll wait.
What’s the matter? Having trouble?
**NEITHER AGENDA 47 OR PROJECT 2025 ADVOCATE DOING AWAY WITH BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, YOU DISHONEST, INCOMPETENT MOTHERFUCKER.**
*I WOULD KNOW, I LOOKED.*
And I am not at all opposed to chewing Trump or others out when they deserve it, such as when I painstakingly looked through a speech to confirm Trump did indeed claim he “didn’t think” George Washington owned slaves.
But leaving aside how 47 and 2025 are separate things with conflicting prognostics, neither touch upon ending birthright citizenship, and I dare you to prove otherwise.
“her citizenship may be in question should Trump be elected.”
No, no it would not be, for the reasons I mentioned before as well as the general fact that most laws regarding citizenship do not apply retroactively (which is also something you and your ilk have counted on while supporting human trafficking on a scale rarely seen since the abolition of the legal slave trade).
This is you demonizing your political rivals yet again and counting on nobody actually reading the texts to see if you were full of it.
“It’s also important to note that there have been many comments in the extreme right wing sphere about her ethnicity with some being unhappy.”
And this is supposed to matter to Trump or myself how? It’s at this point that I note that even the likes of James Mason and Richard Spencer are supposedly “the extreme right wing sphere”, and I note that the latter has explicitly endorsed Biden/Harris while Mason continues screaming incoherently into the void in a fashion that even your friend Kevin the Reject Sale Roehm is dwarfed by, advocating violent repudiation of all electoral politics in the US.
“SOMEONE SOMEWHERE SAID SOMETHING BAD ABOUT VANCE’S WIFE’S ETHNICITY!”
Yeah and? That isn’t news. It isn’t even a dumb gotcha about the Trumps because it has nothing to do with them.
“Plus the whole emphasis on white families having priority is well known and stated often by far right white nationalists.”
You mean the same people who viciously rejected Trump for his work with minorities, especially after his first term? Such as Rick Spencer, the guy who endorsed Biden/Harris?
Yeah, this is what happens when you’re so deluded and prepared to strawman all your enemies you don’t actually know them, or what they are and aren’t for. Which is why you wind up looking like an idiot such as claiming a Slovene Fashion Veteran isn’t fluent in Italian because of a momentary, ambiguous lapse when being talked to by the Pope, who himself is not a native speaker of Standard Italian.
Much as you and your fellow idiots wish to claim otherwise, “White Nationalists” HAVE NEVER BEEN A PART OF TRUMP’S POLITICAL BASE OR SUPPORT. For better or worse their vote is equal to yours or mine, and he wouldn’t be capable of psychically scanning the ballots and rejecting the votes of people like Richard Spencer even if he wanted to, but he did not seek to court their support. He did not appeal to them. Why so many deluded themselves into thinking otherwise is largely a product of wishful thinking and remorseless, demonizing propaganda from you and your ilk (much like they managed to do with literally Goldwater) which also explains why so many of them acted scandalized or “betrayed” like Spencer did and have come back home to the political left by supporting Biden and Harris, or staying home.
Trump’s political base has always been the working class rust belters, mostly men, and flyover country small families. Both of whom, you’d know if you had any contact with them, are multiracial and multiethnic. This is not NEW. This would not be shocking were it not for you and your fellow idiots managing to gaslight yourselves into honestly believing that Trump was a white supremacist and most Hispanic Americans like Illegal Immigrants and Coyotes.
This is what you get for not doing your homework.
“So, sorry, conservatives and Republicans own this and you can’t pretend you don’t when it’s all over the place and pretty out in the open!”
Again dipshit, we don’t. And I know because unlike you, I actually bother researching this. You lied blatantly about Agenda 47. You lied blatantly about Project 2025. You used bizarre guilt by association bullshit to claim Neo-National Socialists like Richard Spencer and your friend Kevin are Conservative Republicans and thus Trump and Vance are responsible for whatever bullshit they advocate for (while you would never dream of claiming Kamala Harris is responsible for the CPUSA).
You’re a dishonest idiot grasping at straws. And it shows.
Kevin says: Jesus, someone hit a nerve. You need to be the president of the “First Lady’s Who Expose Their Vagina” club. But, as one famous exposer of her vagina said, “I really don’t care do you.”
Turtler says: So you finally deign to show up and reply, Rummage Sale Roehm. Am I supposed to be honored? Unfortunately you’re too much of a dishonest coward and parasite to confer any.
“Jesus, someone hit a nerve.”
Why would it not be?
Your butt buddy “A Reader” peddled bullshit blood libel about Agenda 47 and the 2025 Project, in order to smear, attack, and dehumanize people like me. They then went on to try and use this lie to try and bring in random white supremacist scumbags of various leanings and allege that Trump and Vance were tied to them (even when people like Richard Spencer have made their feelings and leanings clear).
And on top of that, A Reader was simply fucking retarded and condescending with their “proof” that Melania is not fluent in Italian. Melania being fluent in Italian or not honestly doesn’t move the needle with me (and I’d even be willing to consider her fluency is exaggerated), but the dumbass ignorant way in which A Reader tried to “prove” this is staggering, such as ignoring that the Anti-Pope in Rome speaks with an unusual accent that can be odd to grasp even for native Italian speakers, and that in Melania’s old career Italian fluency is a marketable, put-it-on-your-resume-skill. If she wasn’t fluent in Italian, I would expect a parade of left leaning Fashionistas to be happy to provide fuel for the “expose” of that.
And yet there has been a conspicuous absence of those. Now why is that?
“You need to be the president of the “First Lady’s Who Expose Their Vagina” club.”
It’s a title I do not seek but would accept. It is certainly less repulsive and illegal than “Honorary Gigolo” or “Rummage Sale Roehm.” So that is one advantage I have over you.
“But, as one famous exposer of her vagina said, “I really don’t care do you.””
Well, I care when scumbags like you engage in blood libel and blatant lying. Especially when you do so very, very stupidly like A Reader did here and you have been known to do.
GWB says: You really are a nasty little POS, aren’t you?
Que says: Wow, Kev, misogynistic much? I thought you progressives were all about women having total agency over their bodies, and that there was no shame in “sex work.”
GWB says: *I WOULD KNOW, I LOOKED.*
This struck a nerve with me because of the parallel to the Reformation in the 1500s. One of the things that Luther did to piss off Pope Leo was to translate the Bible into the “vulgar” language (German in this case, others had done English and I think Dutch). (And yes, this was ironic, since the preferred translation for the Roman church was the “Vulgate” – a Latin translation that was the common language at the time.) A bishop or cardinal of the time quipped that if the rabble could read the Bible for themselves, who knows what sort of absurd heresies they would come up with?
Progressivism (being, ultimately a religion that uses politics to gain power, rather than a politic itself) is big on received wisdom. The common people are supposed to receive said wisdom from the priests (gov’t experts) and prophets (the media) and simply believe it – because said experts know better. They are NOT supposed to actually open the documents themselves and read what is written there – that would be too much for them to handle. (Given all the linguistic twaddle in things like Critical Theory, it really isn’t understandable – unless you have been educated out of all common sense.) This is what you’re seeing with the left: a mis-educated peasant zealotry.
GWB says: her citizenship may be in question should Trump be elected
No, you moron, it wouldn’t. Because the Constitution forbids ex post facto laws,
Plus the whole emphasis on white families having priority is well known and stated often by far right white nationalists.
Nice elision from some tiny group of people to the broader conservative portion of the electorate. You really are a dishonest boor.
11 Comments