While world leaders gathered in Munich to talk about energy security, Russia’s aggression, China’s ambition, and actual war, the moral emergency of the moment, according to Hillary Clinton, turned out to be American resistance to gender ideology.

Right Wing Regressive Movement

At the Munich Security Conference, Hillary Clinton moderated a panel titled “Fundamental Rights for Women.” And to help define those rights, she handed the microphone to Representative Sarah Tim McBride – a biological male – as a voice for women. I kid you not. But at this point, are we really surprised anymore?

McBride’s viewpoint is that there is a coordinated “right wing regressive movement” that supposedly placed trans people at the center of political hostility. In his telling, resistance to gender ideology is not disagreement. It is deliberate harm. It is intentional. And it will inevitably damage women as well.

But, who forced their sickness and delusions onto the world?

Bob Hoge from RedState wraps it clearly with this angle:

There’s plenty to unpack here. First, I would note that the lawmaker claims that dark forces have “placed trans people at the center” of an effort to discriminate against them.

I would argue that the opposite is true: the trans movement put itself at the center of the debate. Most people were happy to live and let live — until males started demanding to use women’s restrooms and locker rooms, biological men started competing in women’s sports (stealing their medals and often injuring them), forcing their agenda on little kids in school, and advocating for often irreversible surgical procedures to confirm the “gender identities” of minor children.

To advocate for all those extreme policies and not expect blowback is insanity.

Meanwhile, Sarah McBride is an advocate for men playing in girls’ sports, and Hillary Clinton has never said boo about the practice. How are you fighting for the “fundamental rights” you claim to be if you can’t even stand up for innocent student athletes and confused teens?

For decades, feminists insisted that women deserved their own spaces, their own way of legal protections, and their own recognition under law. The argument was simple: women are a distinct biological category, and that distinction matters. Now we are told that the very act of acknowledging biological sex is prejudiced, and that a man belongs at the center of a conversation about women’s rights.

Yes, right there in our faces, Hillary Clinton thinks Tim McBride is a great voice for women. And why? Because he puts on a skirt and wears makeup and insists he has every right to be in women-only spaces. Because trans!

Don’t Be Nervous

Meanwhile, at the same conference, a Czech political figure pushed back during another exchange and stated plainly that he believes there are two genders. I need to correct him for a second. There are only two sexes; gender is a made-up term that was created to start all of this trans cult ideology.

Saying male and female exist as biological realities now qualifies as controversial on the global stage.

This is a man.
The same man with long hair was chosen by Hillary Clinton to open a forum on women’s rights.
That was the contradiction the Czech gentleman calmly stated.
Hillary interrupted and attempted to mock him.
The matter is straightforward…women’s rights depend on the… pic.twitter.com/qL5xASiet3

— B. Light 🇺🇸 (@Bfor1A) February 15, 2026

Hillary kept trying to interrupt him, pressing, “Which gender? Women having their rights?”

Women have rights. The issue is whether we’re allowed to keep our own spaces. And you, Hillary, seem perfectly comfortable handing those over to men. What part of that argument are you missing?

The Real Threat On Women Is Trans

These words actually came out of McBride’s mouth: “threats towards trans people are threats toward all women.” The audacity of that sentence is staggering. Women object to losing their sports teams, their scholarships, their shelters, their privacy, and somehow they are the problem. Girls who want a level playing field are framed as oppressors. Mothers who speak up are cast as extremists.

It’s a neat trick. Turn defense into aggression and turn biology into hate.

And let’s be clear about something. Yes, of course, a man can advocate for women’s rights. Fathers do it. Husbands do it. Male lawmakers have done it for decades. That has never been the issue. The issue is not support. The issue is substitution.

But Tim McBride is not the voice for women’s rights. A biological man who denies the meaning of female cannot speak for women without erasing them in the process. But then again, that seems to be precisely what the Democrats are after.

I’m Not A Vet But…

This is the person whom Hillary should have had on the panel, Kellie-Jay Keen. She’s not a vet, but she knows what a dog is. Kellie-Jay Keen’s talent for using plain language to support women is spot on, and we could all learn from her.

When the definition of a woman becomes a costume, or a feeling, or a declaration, the legal category collapses. And once the category collapses, so do the protections attached to it. Title IX means nothing; Biden made sure of that. Women’s prisons mean nothing because America is still allowing male inmates to be housed with women. When women’s shelters become co-ed, it defeats the purpose. Women’s sports become open season.

Hillary Clinton’s big “women’s rights” moment in Munich did not defend women. It showcased the new rule. Women are allowed to exist, as long as we do not insist on anything. Not privacy, not fairness, not boundaries, and certainly not biology.

That’s their game. Redefine the word woman until it means nothing. Then act shocked when women notice they are being erased.

If women’s rights are “fundamental” then stop treating women as optional.

Feature Image: Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons/Ted Eytan, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons/edited with Canva Pro