It is officially undeniable. FEMA administrator Deanne Criswell confirmed to the House committee in her testimony today that yes, homes were skipped over by FEMA teams in Florida after Hurricane Milton due to their political signage.
While this first hearing yielded the typical grandstanding by House members, Criswell had little to say beyond insisting that there was not a “widespread cultural problem” within FEMA itself.
FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell addresses the shocking reports of FEMA leaders instructing staff to bypass homes with Trump signs:
"I do not believe that this employee's actions are indicative of any widespread cultural problems at FEMA." pic.twitter.com/oQifqi1JAT
— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) November 19, 2024
Her proof of that is that she fired Marn’i Washington – but remember, she only did so AFTER the exposé by The Daily Wire went public. Criswell admitted that FEMA officials learned about the actions of Washington via a whistleblower report on October 28th, but that she herself didn’t know about it until November 7th, and she fired Washington on November 9th. She has also now said that she will ask for an Inspector General investigation into what happened in Florida.
It’s clear that Criswell is pinning the whole thing on Washington. She may be committing to an IG investigation now, but her job hinges on everyone believing that Washington was the proverbial “bad apple” who had to go.
Marn’i Washington, on the other hand, is refusing to play along. She has now given multiple interviews where she firmly expresses her belief that she interpreted the FEMA directives correctly, and insists that she is being scapegoated so FEMA can save face.
In an interview on NewsNation’s “Dan Abrams Live,” the former agency employee, Marn’i Washington, denied wrongdoing.
“So firstly, I’m being framed. There’s no violation of the Hatch Act. I was simply following orders,” Washington told Abrams, when asked whether part of the guidance she offered her team was to avoid homes advertising Trump, and if so, why.
“I did not vote for Kamala Harris, so there is no political plight on my part. I was simply following orders,” she added.
Washington sought to pin blame on her supervisor.
“I execute orders. I don’t create policy. I do not reinvent the wheel. My record shows that,” Washington later said in the interview.
And Washington is pointing a finger.
BREAKING: FEMA worker who was fired for instructing members to skip hurricane victims’ homes if they had pro-Trump signs says she was instructed to avoid certain communities that were labeled “political hostile territory” by the Biden administration
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 19, 2024
In an interview given to CNN just yesterday, Washington also called out Criswell directly.
Washington said FEMA’s guidelines to relief workers in Florida were to remove themselves from hostile situations if they felt threatened or unsafe.
“I did not act on my own volition. Everything we did was out of the focus of safety and making sure our team felt comfortable,” Washington told Coates. “I don’t create policy. FEMA does. I just implement it in the field.”
Asked if her relief team avoided all homes with Trump signs, Washington said, “It was only selected areas where there were teammates that felt uncomfortable, they did not feel safe and they feared for their safety.”
“We registered Trump supporters, we’ve given them service as well, just we avoided the areas that were hostile,” she added.
“It would be nice if Ms. Criswell would be human and come to terms with the fact that FEMA has not addressed the safety concerns that the crew leads and the specialists experience out in the Field,” Washington said. “There are plenty of reports that discuss hostile encounters, is how FEMA describes it, and our method is avoidance. I don’t understand why we’re hiding that from the American people.”
Washington said she has not been asked to appear before lawmakers herself, but that she would be willing to do so.
Marn’i Washington, in these interviews, comes off as someone who believes that she did nothing wrong, and that she interpreted what the FEMA directives were for the “safety and comfort” of the employees under her. Let’s pick this apart a little. Washington keeps insisting that FEMA tells workers to “de-escalate” and avoid “hostile” situations. Previously, she said a “hostile” situation could be something as simple as someone saying that they don’t like FEMA. These teams are going into areas that have just suffered devastating and catastrophic damage, altering people’s lives and livelihoods, and she keeps insisting that her team must be “comfortable.” Call me crazy, but this particular job is not SUPPOSED to be “comfortable.” We, as a society, have developed a warped sense of “safety” and “comfort” and expect them to be one and the same. FEMA is approaching people in one of the most stressful moments of their lives, but if they feel “uncomfortable,” then too bad for the people on the ground?
THAT is the “widespread cultural problem” that Administrator Criswell is missing. This isn’t necessarily about political bias, although it definitely plays a part and must be investigated by the IG at this point. The problem is that federal employees (and many in the private sector as well) have equated “safety” with being “comfortable,” and any real or perceived discomfort is cause to not do their job properly, or avoid doing their job at all. These FEMA employees, Washington included, seem to think that meeting people in their moment of great need should be “comfortable” FOR THE FEMA EMPLOYEES INVOLVED. Stress, pain, and suffering of others be damned – those people WILL welcome FEMA with gratitude and open arms, because God forbid Marn’i Washington’s team feel one iota of hostility or discomfort. And if you don’t, or if they think you won’t because of the sign on your lawn in support of a certain political candidate? No federal assistance for you!
It’s much easier to focus on the political element of this situation because, after all, how would an Inspector General’s report quantify “comfort” for FEMA employees? But if Criswell was really honest, she would acknowledge that Washington is correct, and “the method is avoidance.” Perhaps not solely for political affiliations, but for any perceived discomfort on the part of an employee. We do not have a federal bureaucracy that works for all taxpayers when federal employees are allowed to shrink back and say “ooooh, that person makes me feel uncomfortable and I don’t want to serve them.” So yes, Administrator Criswell, you DO have a “widespread cultural problems.” Your employees are focused on their personal comfort, not doing the job, and FEMA instructions then allowed supervisors like Marn’i Washington to interpret that de-escalation policy however they pleased. And that is unacceptable for a federal agency that is supposed to be serving the public in their worst moments.
Featured image via Bill Koplitz on Wikimedia Commons from the FEMA Photo Library archives, cropped, public domain
[…] YEAH, THE MASKS ARE OFF: FEMA Admin Denies Culture Problem, Fired Employee Disagrees. […]
At the moment it should be called Federal Emergency Mismanagement Agency.
Hopefully on Jan 20 Administrator Criswell will be replaced by someone actually competent and every single employee and contractor of FEMA will be made to understand that they are in Emergency Management business – and if they’re uncomfortable with that fact – leave.
It’s actually even worse than many think about FEMA
https://thepostmillennial.com/fema-whistleblower-says-trump-supporters-viewed-as-domestic-terrorists-by-agency .
FEMA bureaucrats that defined and implemented such illegal “policy” should at the very least loose their jobs and federal pensions.
That’s the thing about widespread cultural problems – those embedded in the culture don’t see them as problems.
Since at least the regime of the lightbringer, many if not all federal agencies have been rotten to the core. DEI promotions have destroyed any semblance of functionality and purpose of these agencies. All senior leadership should be grilled on the purpose and operations of their agencies, and if goal number one isn’t to serve the people, then that “leader” needs to go. Once you have all the leaders understanding their missions, do the same with the underlings. Any swamp critters need to be shown the door
And the whole function of the agency needs to be evaluated as well. If it doesn’t actualy serve a useful purpose, send em to DOGE..
The FEMA employee interviews and testimony still leave out some of the reports made by in-field staff, which included notes like, “Did not stop, per guidance of Trump sign in yard.” There was no objective sense of “comfort level” since they didn’t speak to anyone. It wasn’t possible to be deemed hostile without personal interaction, it was deemed political and so these actions WERE political in nature. I have no doubt this went up higher in the organization than Washington. As others have said, it’s time to rework this agency along with a lot of others.
there will be investigation into fema by the doj and fbi under Trump. many people will have to testify under oath.
What if the census bureau adopted this same policy?
“I’m uncomfortable counting heads in the ‘hood so let’s skip them.”
NO–the agency has a DUTY to meet with everyone impacted by an emergency and to help them be whole again regardless if they have bad breath or the “wrong” sign in the yard.
The thing is Washington is simply the one stupid enough to put the order in writing. The higher ups knew better than to do that. As far as the ongoing FEMA fiasco, North Carolinians are still suffering and FEMA doesn’t seem to care one iota. We live in western NC and were talking to someone who lives in Madison County, who says FEMA is virtually non-existent. And whatever happened to all those FEMA trailers we hear about after Katrina? North Carolinians are living in tents. It’s been mostly dry since the flood, but we have had some rain, and winter is coming. Does anyone in the federal government have a heart or a concern about these people? I know, to ask the question is to answer the question.
Are we supposed to believe that no one without a Trump sign, or even someone displaying a Harris sign – if there were any – was not stressed, emotional, and might appear hostile to FEMA employees? Maybe not at Criswell’s level, but certainly somewhere in the chain of command, supervisors gave the blanket instruction to FEMA employees to simply avoid large swaths of Florida given its heavily Trump political leaning.
this all applies to the entire federal government.
Sounds like Lard’i is full of shit.
Federal Enemies Murdering America
What would happen if a FEMA worker did not check in at a residence that displayed a Black Power flag and was in a predominately African-American neighborhood? Would the worker get the all-clear by claiming he/she felt threatened?
[…] Preference Cascade, The Empire Strikes Back, and Launching Things Into The Sun Victory Girls: FEMA Admin Denies Culture Problem, Fired Employee Disagrees, Biden Gives Abortion Ghoul Cecile Richards The Medal of Freedom, and Jaguar, Do You Even Sell […]
15 Comments