Previous post
“Inclusion” policies of the Left are cruel jokes. And few are crueler than the Trans-inclusive policies that bully and shame minor girls who resist males watching them undress in school locker rooms.
Shut-up, they say.
During the Lucia Mar Unified School District (LMUSD) board meeting on Wednesday, a high-school junior girls’ track athlete at Arroyo Grande High School named Celeste Diest took the podium to recount her experience of having to change in front of a biologically male trans athlete before practice, while that athlete allegedly watched her undress.
“I went into the women’s locker room to change for track practice where I saw, at the end of my row, a biological male watching not only myself, but the other young women undress. This experience was beyond traumatizing,” Diest said, as she began to choke up and cry.
“Adults like yourself make me and my peers feel like our own comfort was invalid, even though our privacy was and still is completely violated.”
Diest then fought through her tears to argue that the trans athlete’s XY chromosomes define the person as a male, adding, “That is basic biology.”
But Diest was then interrupted by LMUSD board president Colleen Martin.
“Okay, please wrap it up,” Martin said, gesturing to Diest to finish her point.
A brave 17-year-old girl breaks down in tears telling her CA school board about a male athlete watching girls change in the locker room.
Hear her cry. Hear her story.
California is failing our daughters. Girls deserve better. This is why we fight. pic.twitter.com/Gykmn1q8yx
— Sophia Lorey (@SophiaSLorey) April 17, 2025
The right of women and girls to privacy, especially in intimate moments, has been pointed out numerous times over the past few years as Transgender ideology has pushed its way into a privileged position. Complaints about males in female restrooms, changing rooms, or locker rooms has been met with either contempt from those in charge of such facilities or outright hostility towards the females who dare speak out.
Whether it has been J.K. Rowling, where attempts to erase her from the Harry Potter universe and cancel her appearances, to the assaults on Riley Gaines, there has been no time that the Trans activists have ever questioned their own cruel behavior. Indeed, like LMUSD’s Colleen Martin indicates, it is the complainers who are in the wrong.
Hey, cisgirl, that’s a female penis! Get used to it, you bigot!
How did we ever get to the point that a Supreme Court, one in the UK, even has to rule on what is biological reality? There are two, only two, sexes. Immutable, non-fungible. Gender was a word used to describe feminine and masculine parts of language. It wasn’t until the infamous Dr. John Money’s “research” into sex and sex roles that he coined the phrase “gender roles” while claiming that children under two could change sex/gender through role play. He was a cruel, fetish-obsessed man who took advantage of a trusting family to engage in the most outrageous behavior possible with twin boys in the name of his “research”. Money’s legacy includes the eventual suicides of those poor boys and fuels an entire industry in gender-affirming care that continues to mutilate and sterilize children to this day.
The dismantling of the Trans-Medical-Institutional complex is finally underway. But the UK Supreme Court and the Trump administration’s enforcement of Title IX are just the beginning. So much more has to be done.
Our daughters and sons deserve it.
featured image, modified, Adobe Stock standard license
Two sexes (male & female) and four genders (masculine, feminine, neuter, & common). Sex is physiologically defined while gender is culturally/linguistically ascribed). Neither can be changed by an individual whim.
Some species of amphibians can change sex in response to external circumstances, but humans cannot. A man can castrate himself – that eunuch is still a man and still a “he,” albeit a now-lesser version of both. “He” is not now a “she” or even an “it,” he is just a castrated man.
Even if someone takes issue with that rationale, silencing a young woman who has been victimized by subversive policy is unworthy of anyone entrusted with the welfare of young people.
DAVID REIMER: I was told I was a girl, I didn’t like dressing like a girl, I didn’t like behaving like a girl, I didn’t like acting like a girl. I’m not a professor in anything but you know you don’t wake up one morning deciding that you’re a boy or a girl, you just know.
The ultimate goal is destruction of the family as the foundation of our society. Fortunately, the Administration is focused on Maine’s rebellion at the moment, and once that is settled, and states like CA get the message, a nation-wide rollback of those disgusting policies can commence.
The destruction of a commonly experienced objective reality, prior and superior to anyone’s opinions or preferences, is the Left main tactic for imposing itself on the rest of us. Once it has achieved that aim, it will have total control — for without an objective reality, how could anyone object to any Leftist proposition? Leftist militancy would take care of the rest: “We the smart, moral ones decide what reality is! And if you dare to differ, we’ll destroy you!”
4 Comments