Previous post
Dave Halls, Alec Baldwin’s assistant director, turns out was fired for the accidental discharge of a weapon on a prior movie set. The plot thickens as affidavits, statements, and witness statements are beginning to gel surrounding the Alec Baldwin movie set shooting that left one person dead and another wounded.
Mainstream media’s latest distraction regarding Baldwin’s culpability is that assistant director, Dave Halls, had been terminated from a previous movie set because of the accidental discharge of a weapon.
“The assistant director on the movie ‘Rust,’ who handed a prop gun to Alec Baldwin before the fatal shooting last week, was previously fired from a film production after a gun incident injured a crew member…Dave Halls was serving as assistant director on the film ‘Freedom’s Path’ in 2019, when a gun ‘unexpectedly discharged’ on set, causing a sound crew member to recoil from the blast, halting production…”
I swear I will spit nails if another news outlet says “prop gun” one more time. If a firearm can be loaded with ammunition—which this one was–it isn’t a prop gun. It’s a real firearm and needs to be treated as such. Why? People get killed that way.
It’s kind of a big rule in Hollywood: don’t put live rounds in the guns used on set.
Hollywood firearm expert says Alec Baldwin broke No. 1 rule of gun safety; crew used gun for off-set ‘fun,’ report says https://t.co/KlJZu263uC
— DieHardTrumper (@ewes19) October 26, 2021
Back to the media’s desire to muddy the waters and sway blame away from their favorite gun control spokesman, Trump-hater, Alec Baldwin. The assistant director did it! Hold that thought, CNN and MSNBS (sic, intentionally).
Before anyone goes spouting off on how much they know about firearms, let me be clear. I know firearms well; I know firearms safety really well. The assistant director yelling “cold gun” to Alec Baldwin does not give Alec Baldwin a pass—despite CNN’s deepest desires to keep their golden boy safe from legal or criminal liability.
Legal insurrection lays out the facts quite nicely.
But but but…He was told it was a “cold gun”. It’s the other guy’s fault.
If you have ever been to a gun range, a firearms safety class, or a gun store, you’ll see a crazy thing happen. A person will pull back the slide of a firearm, checking it for live rounds. Seeing none, that person will hand the firearm to the guy or gal next to him and he or she will do the same thing. I’ll be at a gun counter and ask to see a firearm. The clerk will take out the firearm, pull back the slide to check, turn it around to not sweep the muzzle towards me, and I’ll take it. I will then automatically pull back the slide to check for live rounds even though I just witnessed the clerk do it. It is muscle memory. Anyone hands a firearm to anyone, pull back the slide and check for live rounds even though you just watched the guy next to you check it.
Obsession best describes how much people will check, double check, then double check again to make sure a live round it not in that chamber. It is that important. It is an obsession worth doing.
Why? Because I don’t trust that guy or gal with my life. If they are wrong, someone is dead.
Do actors receive this training on how to be this obsessed over firearms safety? Yes. Veteran actor Baldwin certainly has.
“Actors and even sometimes crew will receive training from weapons professionals on gun safety. ‘You spend time with them, showing how a gun works, how you don’t point it at anyone ever, how you keep your finger off the trigger and always point it down,’ [Keith Walters, an art director, says]
Follow that hyperlink regarding training. It goes on to explain the elaborate ways Hollywood prevents actors from actually having to take a direct shot at a person to prevent any kind of accident. In other words, the latest revelations that Alec was shooting a scene where he had the firearm pointed to the camera didn’t need to be set up that way. I would contend that is not the standard way such a scene would be typically set up. The camera could have been remotely operated, plexiglass shields could have been utilized, or Alec could have shot “off axis” away from a person.
Whether the Baldwin incident was during the filming of a scene or a rehearsal, or while goofing around—this tragedy was preventable. The four rules of firearms safety should always be followed, of course. Ingenious and creative ways to shoot scenes to prevent anyone from being in the line of fire were not utilized.
And then there’s the budget cutting fiasco the movie “Rust” had been plagued with, resulting in colossal inexperience on a set handling firearms. The one person who had experience in anything was the assistant director who had experience in the accidental discharges of firearms. What could go wrong?
“As a producer on ‘Rust,’ Baldwin could be held culpable for the cost-cutting, chaos and eventual hire of a young head armorer with just one stint in said job on her résumé — because…multiple other armorers turned it down over low pay and high stakes, with too many firearms to manage.”
Despite the mainstream media treating Baldwin with kid gloves, no one in the firearms world is going for it. Despite Monday’s revelations regarding the assistant director, few in the firearms handling of Hollywood is accepting these slippery excuses either.
Alec Baldwin oversaw a shoddy movie production fraught with carelessness, most of it his, and inexperience that resulted in a woman being killed.
Featured Image: Alec Baldwin vino a divertirse a El Hormiguero by El Hormiguero via Flickr, license CC Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic, cropped.
Not an accident. This was negligence.
Reckless disregard, actually. By everyone in the chain of custody for that firearm.
Forget all the contributory stories….Baldwin is the guilty party here…He, no one else, pointed the gun and pulled the trigger!
You’re falling for the fallacy that there can only be one fall guy.
EVERYONE in the chain of custody for that weapon is 100% at fault in terms of reckless disregard of the safety rules. ANY ONE of them could have stopped the tragedy by merely doing their jobs correctly. They are ALL at fault.
Yes. Everyone in the chain of custody for that weapon has fault in the negligence that caused this death. But the person who committed the act, committed the act. That tragedy doesn’t happen if the final link in the chain of culpability acts responsibly, not negligently and recklessly.
The tragedy also doesn’t happen if any of the others break the chain. Sorry, but you can’t lump all the responsibility and all the reckless disregard on Baldwin, no matter how much he may deserve your or my enmity. This was a group project, and they all get the same grade.
It doesn’t even need to be someone else handing you a firearm. I’m the only one who can get into my gun safe – I check the Glock before I put it away – and check it again when I take it out. Even at the range, I check the chamber again before I insert the magazine. VERY rarely you can get an AD from doing that, if a round is in the chamber. VERY rarely is not good enough.
As the writer at Legal Insurrection has noted Baldwin’s crisis management consultants are busy trying to throw the blame on others to deflect it from Little Sir Alec.
Isn’t “prop” short for “property,” not a synonym for fake or nonfunctional? If so, it’s a perfectly apropos term – though misleading in the way the term is commonly understood.
Halls certainly appears culpable to a large degree, but his alleged actions would only take the blame off the armorer. Baldwin is entirely responsible for the actual death. I fully believe it was unintentional, but he’s still responsible.
It sickens me, seeing him consoling the family of the deceased. Many years ago, a friend was killed in a hunting accident when a member of his party shot at movement – he didn’t mean to kill him, and no one has ever accused him of doing so intentionally, but to even be in the same room of any of the family would be suicide.
Isn’t “prop” short for “property,” not a synonym for fake or nonfunctional?
Yes.
As to taking blame off the armorer? Not a bit. There never should have been a live* round in that weapon. All three people are responsible for that death. And each one is fully responsible, as the proper actions by any one of them would have stopped the chain of events and prevented the death.
(* In this sense, a round with a bullet capping the cartridge, rather than a round with nothing but powder and a primer.)
From what I’ve been able to find regarding protocol for introducing a firearm to a set, Halls broke it by procuring the weapon on his own.
A weapon sitting unguarded on a cart definitely deserves attention, but I haven’t found anything to suggest it was against protocol.
From what I understand (and I’m still learning, please correct me if I’m wrong), the chain of custody for introducing any firearm to a film set begins with the armorer (or possibly the prop master?) physically clearing the weapon. The AD grabbing a weapon off a cart effectively cuts that armorer out of the equation. I can see some possible recklessness on her part for leaving that weapon unsecured, but not directly tied to the homicide. The breach of protocol seems to start with Halls.
As a producer, and as the individual who actually fired the shot, Baldwin seems to be doubly responsible – for establishing an unsafe climate on the set, and for the ND itself.
The armorer is the one who put the weapon on the cart in question.
Did she?
Even if she did, protocol doesn’t say the AD can pick up a random weapon from the cart and bring it on set. Protocol states the armorer must inspect and clear any weapon before it is handed over to be brought on set.
The AD allegedly excluded the armorer from the entire chain. The armorer may have been careless, but any error she made appears to be only indirectly connected to this tragedy.
You’re going to need to give me a source for the idea that the AD cut the armorer out of the chain. The cart was ON the set. The armorer had supposedly placed 3 weapons there. The AD picked one up and brought it to the actor.
And, BTW, the fact there were even live rounds stored on the set (evidently nearby the blanks) is exactly her responsibility. No, the armorer is absolutely as at fault as the AD and Baldwin unless someone demonstrates facts of which none of us are aware at this point.
THIS THIS SO VERY MUCH THIS.
As an RSO and instructor at a range/gunstore I never EVER handle a firearm without a check & clear. EVER.
I don’t care if you just showed it to me clear. I will still clear it myself. This is A-1 basic safe handling.
“If you have ever been to a gun range, a firearms safety class, or a gun store, you’ll see a crazy thing happen. A person will pull back the slide of a firearm, checking it for live rounds. Seeing none, that person will hand the firearm to the guy or gal next to him and he or she will do the same thing. I’ll be at a gun counter and ask to see a firearm. The clerk will take out the firearm, pull back the slide to check, turn it around to not sweep the muzzle towards me, and I’ll take it. I will then automatically pull back the slide to check for live rounds even though I just witnessed the clerk do it.”
If a firearm can be loaded with ammunition—which this one was–it isn’t a prop gun.
This is not true. The problem is that the mob believes “prop gun” means “not working” while it means no such thing in the industry. The media is using the term correctly, but their listeners do not understand it that way. (And I would presume the media is exploiting that misunderstanding, yes.)
sway blame away from … Alec Baldwin
But this is, again, the fault of their listeners. There is not a single person to blame. There are numerous people who need to proverbially hang for this. Adding the Assistatn Director to the mix does nothing to dilute the responsibility of the armorer, the actor, and the person who hired these folks: the producer. Do not give in to nor play along with the idea that there must only be one person to blame, only one scapegoat to drive into the wilderness.
Alec was shooting a scene where he had the firearm pointed to the camera
Statements from supposed witnesses suggest it was otherwise. He was NOT acting out a scene, but clowning around. Which means it goes from little to no reason to point the gun in the manner he did.
There are several people who will likely see lawsuits (at a minimum) for their reckless disregard in this incident.
so lay blame here … a real weapon( not a prop gun) , live ammo , and great aim at the woman …. and WHO pulled the trigger??? a guy with a checkered past.
[…] for the death of Hutchins and, as Victory Girls’ Shelby told you about the problems with Dave Halls, the Assistant […]
18 Comments