Scroll down for updates!

I’m not sure when the New York Times decided to try publishing news again, but they’re still an example of epic fail.  Their latest attempt at journalism comes in the form of an “investigative report” claiming that the responsibility for Benghazi falls on a local militia group affiliated with Ansar Al Shariya, not al Qaeda.  What’s more, they claim that the entire attack was over the same video that Susan Rice, Hilary Clinton, and half the Obama Administration lied about over and over.  There’s only one problem.

Ansar al-Shariya is part of the al Qaeda network. They make no denials of this.

The NYT ignores this, claiming that al-Shariya “had no known ­affiliations with terrorist groups.”

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has gone on record against the report, calling it “misleading.”

“They are saying that ­al-Shariah is involved, but al-Shariah is a part of the al Qaeda umbrella, the al Qaeda network,” King said…“Al-Shariah is a pro- al Qaeda terrorist organization,” countered the congressman, a member of the House Intelligence Committee.

This isn’t the first time the NYT has made this claim. Back in October, they published the same premise.  Charles Johnson instantly jumped on the bandwagon, saying “nearly everything about this right wing narrative is wrong.”  The New Yorker is calling those of us demanding justice “Benghazi Truthers.”

Thankfully, FrontPage Magazine steps up and calls the NYT report what it is: “a voluminous multi-part essay that claims to be the product of intensive reporting, but doesn’t really offer much of anything new, except an attempt at reviving a discredited liberal narrative, which its own reporting doesn’t support.”  Daniel Greenfield’s expose of the report is a must-read.

Perhaps the NYT should stick to covering Obama’s Christmas vacation in Hawaii.