Previous post

Save Are Teachers: Iowa teacher makes students protest budget cuts

Next post

Save Are Teachers: Iowa teacher makes students protest budget cuts

A middle-school teacher made her students join her in protesting budget cuts (video here). Unfortunately for her, it looks like her protest did nothing but prove that perhaps our teachers are, in fact, overpaid and underqualified. Check out the sign one of her students was found holding:

It’s a good thing this teacher, Terry Hoffman, is retiring. She’s a language teacher, but apparently she can’t even teach her students simple grammar. Maybe if she spent more time educating her students, and less time planning protests, they wouldn’t be confusing “our” and “are”.

Let’s consider whether or not budget cuts for teachers are really that bad. The idea that teachers are among the lowest-paid and hardest-working is a persistent one. The question is, is it true? Are teachers’ salaries really that low, and are they lower on average than the average worker’s salary overall? Here are some findings from The Manhattan Institute:

Among the key findings of this report:

  • According to the BLS, the average public school teacher in the United States earned $34.06 per hour in 2005.
  • The average public school teacher was paid 36% more per hour than the average non-sales white-collar worker and 11% more than the average professional specialty and technical worker.
  • Full-time public school teachers work on average 36.5 hours per week during weeks that they are working. By comparison, white-collar workers (excluding sales) work 39.4 hours, and professional specialty and technical workers work 39.0 hours per week. Private school teachers work 38.3 hours per week.
  • Compared with public school teachers, editors and reporters earn 24% less; architects, 11% less; psychologists, 9% less; chemists, 5% less; mechanical engineers, 6% less; and economists, 1% less.
  • Compared with public school teachers, airplane pilots earn 186% more; physicians, 80% more; lawyers, 49% more; nuclear engineers, 17% more; actuaries, 9% more; and physicists, 3% more.
  • Public school teachers are paid 61% more per hour than private school teachers, on average nationwide.
  • The Detroit metropolitan area has the highest average public school teacher pay among metropolitan areas for which data are available, at $47.28 per hour, followed by the San Francisco metropolitan area at $46.70 per hour, and the New York metropolitan area at $45.79 per hour.
  • We find no evidence that average teacher pay relative to that of other white-collar or professional specialty workers is related to high school graduation rates in the metropolitan area.

Seems to me like public school teachers got it pretty good, especially when compared with private school teachers, who on average work more hours and get paid considerably less. Your average white-collar worker also works more and gets paid less. It seems like common sense, but people always tend to think that teachers are so poorly paid, and work so hard, and are just downtrodden and unappreciated. It would appear that this is a myth.

The key finding from the Manhattan Institute’s study seems to back that up.

When considering teacher pay, policymakers should be aware that public school teachers, on average, are paid 36% more per-hour than the average white-collar worker and 11% more than the average professional specialty and technical worker. They should be aware that the higher relative pay for public school teachers exists in almost every metro area for which data are available. Finally, they should be aware that paying public school teachers more does not appear to be associated with higher student achievement.

Higher teacher pay does not mean higher student achievement. Teachers are paid more than the average white-collar, specialty, and technical worker. Yet public perception is that teachers make nothing, and if you so much as mention budget cuts, teachers and unions go ballistic.

This particular case, with Terry Hoffman, is especially egregious. It shows exactly why people are crying out for budget cuts, too. Student achievement has steadily declined over the last twenty years. American students used to be the brightest in the world; now we’re behind other countries’ students in nearly every subject. Yet teachers salaries have increased steadily over the past twenty years. Ms. Hoffman’s protest seems to be a perfect example of just what the problem in education is. She had middle school students protesting budget cuts with grammatically incorrect signs. First of all, no teacher should have their students protesting. It doesn’t even matter what they’re protesting; the point is that teachers have no business whatsoever using their students as tools for their own personal agenda. This, however, is particularly inappropriate because this teacher had her students protesting for her own pay raises, shouting “SHOW US THE MONEY!”. It’s wrong, and I hope that the school board got an earful from angry parents (I doubt it). Second, this teacher’s middle school students couldn’t figure out the difference between “are” and “our”? And she couldn’t catch the mistake, either? And she’s a language teacher? It’s disgusting! This woman wants more money even though she apparently can’t even teach her own students basic grammar.

The best thing, in my opinion, is for local and state governments to start implementing merit-based pay and break the union stranglehold. Teachers should earn pay raises, just like everyone else in the world. Great teachers absolutely deserve pay raises, but horrible teachers shouldn’t get pay raises just because they’re teachers who happens to be in a union. If a teacher has students who routinely are failing, then they don’t deserve a raise. A teacher’s performance should decide whether or not they get a raise. Raises should be earned. Unions need to stop corrupting our education system. Our children’s futures depend on it.

Do we really want a nation of students who can’t tell the difference between “are” and “our”?

Cross-posted at The Green Room, Stop the ACLU, and Liberty Pundits.

Written by

9 Comments
  • Mat says:

    Its’ a good thing they teached them there studentz good…

    (rolling eyes). Cripes, what do you expect from kids who TyPe LiKe tHiS FoR A lIvInG?

    Looks like those kids need “hukd on foniks” for their next birthday present…

  • Parental responsibility and motivation has a higher correlation to student achievement that money spent on education. Teachers deserve a good wage, especially in today’s dysfunctional education system, but throwing more money at this serious problem is not the answer.

  • William says:

    You do have to be careful with setting a standard where the teacher’s salary is based upon the performance of the students. Why are the students flunking? Is it because the teacher is bad or because the students feel so entitled that they refuse to work? That is a catch-22. I had a professor for Fluid Dynamics in college that was incredibly tough. I only got a C in the class, but I worked my butt off for that C. Later on, I discovered that other kids that took the “easier” professor didn’t learn near as much as I did.

    Granted, my example is in college, not grade, middle or high school. As Steve said, the parents are essentially encouraging their kids to be uneducated. Maybe we need to start holding kids to a higher standard of learning, and if they can’t even determine “our” vs “are”, then they flunk the grade and have to retake it. Period. I am sure that the parents will scream and shout that you flunked their perfect child, but too bad.

  • She’s a language teacher, but apparently she can’t even teach her students simple grammar.

    Could simply be that grammar has been removed from the middle school curricula because grammar is racist. I wish I was making that up. Also, it takes time away from journaling how you feel about polar bears being killed by global warming.

    I completed grades 3-12 in a rural school in Iowa (I completed grades K-1 elsewhere; Iowa school put me in grade 3 because I could already read/write a little). In high school, I had three teachers of approximately two dozen who demanded any effort out of students beyond knowing where to find the multiple-choice answers for the open-book publisher-generated tests. One was fired mid-year after a former student disclosed they had had consensual sex fifteen years earlier; his replacement for my trigonometry class had taken algebra in high school (but he was “cool” because he let us listen to music while he wasn’t teaching us math and never collected homework). In English class, we watched a cartoon movie of The Hobbit and then “wrote” a “book report” about it as a class, because apparently I was the only freshman capable of reading an entire book–with chapters!! OMG!!–and locating the theme, plot, etc. Spent more class time at pep rallies than in the library, more time watching TV and filmstrips than reading.

    Was woefully prepared for college compared to my peers from Illinois and Indiana, and nearly flunked out. Fortunately, my professors were very good about getting me the remedial math I needed to stay afloat.

    Since discovering former classmates on Facebook, I’ve noticed an inverse correlation between “degree of difficulty of classes taken in high school” and “has an Iowa teaching license and works in the profession.” The less math they took, the prouder they are of being a teacher. Most repugnant to me is a woman of IQ ~90 who now teaches “gifted and talented” in the district where I grew up–her mother (who was smarter but ineffectual in keeping classroom order) taught English there for twenty years and got her the job. I feel sorry for those kids every time I see her misspellings and insipid grammatically-incorrect “teachers are awesome and undervalued” (paraphrasing) bumper-sticker thoughts in her status. At least the ones who are actually gifted (if Iowa schools identify a percentage of students as gifted they get a lot of money, whether the students actually are or not), they know they’re smarter than she is.

    Apologies for unloading my bitterness onto your blog, but you are so right–the unions need to go, teachers should be able to be fired for reasons other than molesting students, and there need to be subject-proficiency hiring standards. The curricula need to be changed, too. More grammar, math, and actual history in the classroom; less movie-watching, thinking about feelings, sex chat, “green” propaganda.

    I actually thought about switching fields and teaching some math, before I moved out of Iowa, but they require a four-year indoctrination degree. Doesn’t matter if you’re proficient in a subject and good at explaining it; only matters if you’ve sat through enough “social justice” lectures. Sigh.

  • Knott Buyinit says:

    Students whose parents value education learn better and more than students with apathetic parents. How much the teachers are paid, how pretty the school is, how multicultural the curriculum is, etc, these factors have almost nothing to do with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

family flag
Subscribe
250
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead