Q&A: Do you carry, and are you for/against gay marriage?

Q&A: Do you carry, and are you for/against gay marriage?

Question(s):

Hmm … Do you carry? What is your favorite piece?
If the Man is going to Afghanistan (You might need to wait till after the dep to actually say as much. I on the other hand can tell you, I am headed that way and would be happy to know his name and unit so I can say hi if the op arrives.)
Can you make a convincing argument FOR the legalization of giving marriage licenses to gays?

I do not currently own a gun. This is not because I don’t want one, but is because I cannot afford one, which sucks a lot. Picking a favorite is difficult. The M1 Garand I thought was a lot of fun to shoot. So was the Mosin-Nagant. My favorite handgun was the Colt 1911. I think the first gun I get, though, will probably be a shotgun of some kind.

No, I cannot make an argument for the legalization of gay marriage. The problem with the pro-gay marriage argument is that it is solely an emotional argument. I understand why gay couples would like to get married — truly, I do. But I would not be willing to overturn a social institution just because there are people out there who want to… just because they want to. Gay marriage is not a civil rights issue. There is no right to marriage in the Constitution. Marriage always has been and hopefully always be defined as between one man and one woman. The issues that many gay marriage supporters bring up — like the ability to leave property to their partners or visit them in the hospitals — are red herrings. Ann Coulter really summed this one up best:

The classic formulation was given by John Kerry in the Democratic debate earlier this week: “What we’re talking about is somebody’s right to be able to visit a loved one in a hospital, somebody’s right to be able to pass on property, somebody’s right to live equally under the state laws as other people in the country.” You would think there were “Straights Only” water fountains, the way Democrats carry on so (as if any gay man would drink non-bottled water). Apparently, health care in this country is better than we’ve been led to believe if so few Americans have ever been to a hospital that they think there’s a guest list. In case you don’t know: Gays already can visit loved ones in hospitals. They can also visit neighbors, random acquaintances and total strangers in hospitals just like everyone else. Gays can also pass on property to whomever they would like, including their cats. Every few years you read about some daft rich widow leaving her entire estate to a cat. It’s perfectly legal. You just need to write a will. Liberals have figured out how to get abortions for 13-year-old girls without their parents’ permission. But we’re supposed to believe that they just can’t get their heads around how a gay guy could leave property to his partner. As for “living equally under the state laws as other people in the country,” unless Kerry is referring to the precise thing he claims to oppose – gay marriage – gays do live equally under the state laws as other people in the country. There are no special speed limit laws or trespassing laws or murder laws for gays. There is, however, some evidence of gay profiling with regard to the enforcement of fashion “don’ts.” What gays can’t do is get married – something all Democrats swear up and down to oppose. Instead, the Democrats demand “civil unions” and then throw out a series of red herrings to explain why. In fact, the only difference between what the Democrats claim to support (civil unions) and what they claim to oppose (gay marriage) is the word “marriage.”

I think that about sums up the gay marriage argument.

Written by

6 Comments
  • J David says:

    I carry EVERYWHERE, including church. I have a Kel-Tec .380 that is about the size of a wallet, and is easily concealed.

    The God-hating self-worshiper’s demi-god Darwin would probably accept that, by standards of nature, homosexuals — who claim that they are “born that way” — are mutant organisms (they are none-viable, as they can not naturally reproduce).

    The militant movement coalition of mutants, femi-nazis, eco-terrorist Gaia-worshipers, and political communists have a New World Order in mind that necessitates the complete destruction of the old one. They are in the final stages of accomplishing their long-sought goals.

  • Instinct says:

    Just picked up a Remington 870 Express Shotgun, Cassy. Well worth the money (only about $350). If you are shorter then go with the Remington 870 Express Jr – The stock is 1″ shorter than on the standard 870.

    My other suggestion is to outfit it with a side saddle so you have 6 extra shells on hand. I also went with the synthetic stock and the matte black finish so that in low light there will never be a light glare off of it.

    I posted a few shots of mine on my blog if you want to see what one looks like with the side saddle attached.

  • Instinct says:

    here’s the link (should have included that I guess)

    http://www.lifein3d.net/2009/03/01/bruce-almighty/

  • J David says:

    Instinct, I have been a fan of the 870 for 20 years. Variations of the 870 have been a cop weapon for many years, and my own experience with it have been A+++. I also have the Hastings rifled barrel which throw a sabot slug down-range as far and as accurately as the typical lever action rifle.

  • Instinct says:

    Yep, I got it because I carried the Mossberg when I was an MP while my dad and brothers (who are civilian cops) had the 870. Love the Remington and even with the smooth bore it’s good to about 150 yards shooting slugs.

    The new one has a 20″ barrel on it but I am considering taking it down to 18″ later on.

  • Cylar says:

    I’ve got 2 Mosin-Nagant’s (this was the primary rifle that the Soviets used to defend the city of Stalingrad during WWII)…and I’ve got my eyes on the M1 Garand. The Garand, for the uninitiated, is a seven-round, semi-automatic rifle that was the primary weapon for American infantry in World War II and Korea.

    A shorter, lighter version of the Garand also exists – the M1 Carbine. This was mostly issued to personnel who weren’t infantry but still deployed to war zones where they might come under attack. We’re talking medics, radio operators, and the like. These people couldn’t carry around a heavy, bulky weapon like the Garand, but they still needed a weapon with greater range and more “punch” than any of the handguns which were commonly issued by the military at the time. Hence, the carbine. It was manufactured by Winchester and a variety of other companies.

    The M1 Carbine is probably the number one gun on my list right now. I know where to find them, and the ammo is still manufactured today. It’s more a matter of affording the gun – they start at $600. The older Garands sell anywhere from $1000 to $1600, or even more depending on condition. I live in California, however, so guns tend to be more expensive here to start with (especially semi-automatics) because of all the regulations. For one, they have to be inspected on import to ensure that they don’t qualify as “assault weapons” under our laws.

    It sucks, but what can you do?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead