Previous post
Like that’s a huge surprise. All she’s famous for is being Paris Hilton’s shopping buddy and starring in a raunchy sex tape. Playboy was bound to follow:
Kim Kardashian is getting klassy!
The amateur pornographer shot a pictorial for Playboy magazine Wednesday in Los Angeles, sources reveal exclusively to PerezHilton.com.
Music video director Hype Williams was behind the lens. No word on when the images will hit the magazine or how much (or little) Kardashian was paid.
Does this surprise anyone? She’s not famous for anything, she isn’t special or different from anyone else except that she’s rich and has a nice ass. However, like all pampered, spoiled celebutantes, she wants to be famous, and is surrounded by enough “yes” people to believe that she is special and different and talented, just like Paris Hilton. And the easiest way to become a household name without actually doing any work is by either releasing a sex tape or posing in Playboy.
I read a quote somewhere years ago. I think I was still in high school when I saw this, but it really struck me. I don’t remember who said it or why, but I just for whatever reason have always remembered it, because it is so relevant to celebrities today:
People used to be famous for being special. Now, people are special because they are famous.
And isn’t that really the case? 75% of celebutards in Hollywood are not that talented. They’re famous because they’re famous; famous as much for who they are dating, or how often they were photographed with nip slips or without underwear, or who they are feuding with, as they are for their latest CD or movie or TV show.
And yes, I know — I guess in a small way I am contributing to that. As much as a I loathe Hollywood, I’m addicted to the gossip.
But, anyways, Kim Kardashian is determined to become famous, and the next pit stop on the road to fame is Playboy, so keep your eyes peeled.
Huck says: And yes, I know — I guess in a small way I am contributing to that. As much as a I loathe Hollywood, I’m addicted to the gossip.
Gossip? Is all the Hollywood “gossip” of the porn variety? Or is that just only the kind of Hollywood “gossip” you’re drawn to?
You may be “addicted to the gossip”; but I’d bet dollars-to-donuts that you’re also addicted to the increase in blog hits that such soft-porn postings provide for your blog. (ASIDE: Is highlighting a Playboy model and putting up such a revealing photo considered “soft-porn”? Or has the line been crossed into regular porn yet?)
Disappointing, Cassy. Call me a crude prude if you must, but I can’t help but think that you are prostituting your blog with these kinds of posts simply for an uptick in blog hits. They’re not necessary, Cassy. Your blog can stand on its own without them.
Cas says: When it comes to Hollywood lately, yes, most of it is somewhat pornographic because celebutards have no spine or willpower and play out their lack of morals on a public stage for all to see.
And no, I’m not prostituting my blog. I actually am addicted to celebrity gossip. I love Perez Hilton and TMZ, and before I discovered those sites I would buy celebrity magazines all the time like People and In Touch. And while I am completely addicted to it, I also loathe celebrities 99.9% of the time. The blog is more an outlet for me to vent those loathings, considering I keep up with what’s going on in the celebutard world.
And as for this particular post, there is a point I am trying to make — that celebrities these days are famous for nothing. They aren’t talented, and they aren’t special or different. They make themselves household names by doing a sex tape, or posing for Playboy, or going to rehab, because it gets them headlines. And Kim Kardashian is exemplifying that 100%.
And you know, my blog hits don’t skyrocket every time I post some celebrity gossip. Trust me, I’m sure I check my blog hits a whole heck of a lot more than you do.
Don_cos says: I also loathe celebrities 99.9% of the time. ~ Cassy
So it’s a kind of Love / Hate attraction? Be careful with that.
Anonymous says: I won’t be buying that issue.
Pissant
Joe says: If that picture above is Kim, she’s uglier than shit. Thank God my subscription is running out.
Gredd says: This is the first picture I’ve seen of her and I can’t say I see where the attraction is. But then that might be a bad picture. /shrug
6 Comments