I’ll jump on the Sarah Palin bandwagon.

I’ll jump on the Sarah Palin bandwagon.

I recently suggested Sen. Jim DeMint for McCain’s running mate. Now, let’s be honest, that’s not going to happen. And that’s not necessarily a bad thing — we can use tenacious Senators, willing to dive headfirst into the fray to fight for conservative principles, in Washington. And if Sen. DeMint ever decides to run for President, I’ll stand enthusiastically behind him. But, to get to the point…

There are still a lot of rumblings about who McCain will pick for his running mate. There’s been talk about Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindal, Fred Thompson, Condoleeza Rice… people who would all make great choices. But McCain has not given us even the tiniest inkling of who he’s leaning towards. And so the speculation continues.

One of the biggest questions everyone seems to be asking is how he can offset Obama through his choice for his veep. He’d need someone young, someone who isn’t necessarily a Washington insider, and preferably a minority, someone who is black or female — like Obama or Hillary.

Preferably a minority. I cannot tell you how much it grates me to have to write that. But it isn’t our side that likes to focus solely on the skin deep.

In any case, who is it that could fit that bill? There are three women that the Politico is suggesting could be great choices for McCain’s running mate. I’m putting my weight behind Sarah Palin. There’s been a lot of buzz about her, and rightly so. Just read her damn bio!

Palin, 44, would add youth to the GOP ticket. As governor she has shown a willingness to veto some of the state’s large capital projects, no small plus for fiscal conservatives. But it’s her personal biography, which excites social conservatives, and reformist background that might most appeal to McCain.

She’s stridently anti-abortion, and recently brought to term her fifth child — who she knew would have Down syndrome. A hunter, fisher and family woman with a rapid professional rise, Palin is a natural for Republican framing.

In 1982, Palin led her underdog high school basketball team to the state championship, earning the nickname “Sarah Barracuda.” Two years later she won the beauty pageant in her hometown of Wasilla, Alaska — and was also named “Miss Congeniality.” By her early thirties, she was the mayor of Wasilla.

In 2003, as ethics commissioner on the state’s Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, she risked her rising political star by resigning her position in protest of ethical misconduct within the state’s Republican leadership as well as then-Gov. Frank Murkowski’s acceptance of that impropriety. Though this briefly made her an outcast within the party, within a year several state Republican heavyweights were reprimanded for the conduct she’d decried.

Her reputation with the party thus redeemed, Palin defeated Murkowski in the 2006 Republican primary on the way to being elected governor.

As governor, she’s continued challenging the state’s powers that be, even winning tax increases on oil companies’ profits. Her approval rating has soared as high as 90 percent, making her one of America’s most popular governors.

“Palin is becoming a star in the conservative movement, a fiscal conservative in a state that is looking like a boondoggle for pork barrel spending,” said Kellyanne Conway, a Republican pollster who specializes in women’s politics.

“She’s young, vibrant, fresh and now, and a new mother of five. She should be in the top tier,” Conway continued. “If the Republican Party wants to wrestle itself free from the perception that it is royalist and not open to putting new talent on the bench, this would be the real opportunity.”

Amen, honey. Here’s a picture of Sarah Palin:

You know, I just might have a little girl crush on Sarah Palin. How could you not?? The woman is amazing!

What’s especially delicious is that she’s younger than Barack Obama, but blows him away in the experience department. She’s accomplished more in ten years than he has in forty! I don’t see a lot of negatives that she could bring to the campaign, but there sure are a heckuva lot of positives. She could do wonders for McCain, and conservatives would be thrilled.

James Joyner thinks that all three women are somewhat weak candidates, and says of Palin,

Palin has become a darling of the conservative blogosphere in recent months and has been touted quite a bit. She’s no doubt a rising star. But it makes little sense to nominate a 44-year-old with no foreign policy experience to be one heartbeat away from the presidency on a ticket whose principal message is that it’s risky to put a 44-year-old with relatively little foreign policy experience in charge of our nation’s security.

But, as Ed points out,

Palin has executive experience, and that comes as a reformer in the wild-and-porky Alaskan political realm. Some will say that she has little foreign-policy experience, but as the only state that borders two foreign nations and is isolated from the rest of the nation by one of them, Palin has to work in that arena on some level in order to govern Alaska. She has sterling social-con credentials and a compelling life story. The only drawback will be the limited time she has served in executive office — just under two years — but that still beats the Democratic presidential nominee, and unlike Obama, she has an actual track record of reform and taking on her own party to get it.

Ed also points out that if McCain wants to make a splash, Palin would be a good choice. And Ed’s right: McCain needs to do something to liven up his base. As of right now, Obama’s supporters are fanatical. For the most part, McCain’s are dreading having to vote for him. Sarah Palin as McCain’s running mate could make this race a lot more exciting, and would not only appease the base, but wake them up! And that’s exactly what McCain needs if he truly wants to be able to win the Presidency. A passionate base is crucial to victory, and a reluctant base can lead to a heavy-handed defeat.

So, as for jumping on the Palin bandwagon, I’ll do it. I’m already there. The only question is whether or not McCain will even consider her.

Written by

11 Comments
  • Shannon in AZ says:

    I read about her ethical stance a while back. I’ve been wanting her for VP ever since. I’m sick of unethical people being in higher echelons of the different government offices. Time to get someone there who has backbone to stand up to the criminals in government.

  • I’ve read a couple articles about her in the past two months. She sounds like a good choice if you ask me.

    Cassy Said:
    “Ed also points out that if McCain wants to make a splash, Palin would be a good choice. And Ed’s right: McCain needs to do something to liven up his base.”

    Amen to that. I’ve never seen more Republicans seeming so…distraught? No, that isn’t right. Dismal, gloomy maybe. And perhaps with good reason with the way things are going right now.

    Oh well, I’m all for her.

  • John says:

    Lots of great stuff about Sarah Palin over at “Draft Sarah Palin for Vice President” http://palinforvp.blogspot.com/.

  • Mat says:

    Actually,

    I think she would be better off not running as VP for McCain. As a conservative, an VP spot with McCain might tarnish her image. Besides, a few more years as governor won’t hurt.

    To be honest, even though it looks rough for the Republican Party (and to be honest, they did it to themselves), I think the long term favors them. I really think they are going to get crushed in November. This means the Democrats will add to their considerable edge in the House, gain a clear majority in the Senate (right now, it’s essentially 50-49 with a heavy reliance on Lieberman) and get Obama in the White House (albeit a very narrow victory there).

    However, look for the Democrats to pull their usual give-away program nonsense for the next four years and you’ll see the November victories dissolve later on. The Obama and Clinton fight in the primary has revealed a glaring weakness in the Democratic party system. Their push towards racial and gender identity created wide schisms within their party, and this will only continue in later elections.

    The Republican Party really didn’t have anyone to put up for election this year, and those who did run were almost entirely moderates (with the exception of Thompson). There is a lot of potential in the younger politicians moving up in the party and it will be those people who will push the party forward in the future. I really like Bobby Jindal (Louisiana governor) and think he will be a very good candidate in 4-8 years. Same with Palin. Anyway, I got on a tangent, but my point is that conservatives will have to be a little patient until the younger ones get some more political experience.

  • Mat Said:
    To be honest, even though it looks rough for the Republican Party (and to be honest, they did it to themselves), I think the long term favors them. I really think they are going to get crushed in November.

    Truly, the Republican Party is nowhere near what it should be, but I am worried about the effect of four years of Obama could bring. It seems to me that our society is cultivating a culture of people who want handouts, do not want to take responsibility and want mommy to hold their damn hands all the time. I am afraid that this will be further reinforced with his presidency.

    I should stop before I rant.

  • Mat says:

    The Shaggy Shoggoth Says:
    Truly, the Republican Party is nowhere near what it should be, but I am worried about the effect of four years of Obama could bring. It seems to me that our society is cultivating a culture of people who want handouts, do not want to take responsibility and want mommy to hold their damn hands all the time. I am afraid that this will be further reinforced with his presidency.

    Shaggy, that’s certainly something to be concerned about, but I think that the current climate is more anti-Republican (and really anti-Bush) than it is pro-Democrat. I certainly don’t hope that Obama sinks the country, since I still have to live here (unlike the Left I can’t simply move to Canada if I don’t like the outcome of an election) but I don’t think that he or the Democratic leadership will do a very good job.

    I see this decade and probably the next as a swing decade(s). I think there are certainly leftist thoughts out there, but I believe it’s more because most people have not seen the true Democratic political machine in action for a long time(you have to remember that the Millenial generation and most Gen-Xers were too young to remember Carter and Co.). I, for one, was only 7 when Reagan became president. I think once people see what the Democrats truly are (leftist to the core) I think they’ll look at other options.

    You have to remember that the problem with the Republican Party right now is not that they are conservative, but moderate (essentially Democrat-Lite). They have no position on anything and a party that has no position is one of inertia.

  • Kinda funny. The democrats can swing from moderate left (welfare reform) to extreme left, whatever they wanna do they won’t shake anyone loose. Not in numbers big enough to worry about. When they lose elections it’s because they failed to deceive enough of the people who don’t want to vote for them anyway.

    Republicans wander to the middle, and it completely defeats the purpose of having them around. There’s a blessing in that. Maybe after they get their clocks cleaned and their noses bloodied, they’ll learn a lesson and stick to principles better next time.

    They need to learn the Morgan Rule #1: If I’m gonna be accused, I wanna be guilty. Acting liberal to avoid ticking off people who aren’t going to be happy with ’em anyway, is a bunch of bee ess.

  • rhcesquire says:

    OMG. Why didn’t the Republicans discover this dynamo (Sarah Palin) a year ago? McCain has waited too long. He should have named her as running mate within a week of his win. This woman’s integrity contrasts greatly with Obama’s deceitfulness. Plus, Shania Twain’s song “She’s Not Just a Pretty Face” is a virtual homage to Sarah Palin.
    PALIN FOR VEEP. Now THAT’s CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN. Do, it John McCain – then you might actually win. Otherwise, you’ll just be another Bob Dole (loser) in the history books.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead