Horrible woman adopts son… and then gives him away

Horrible woman adopts son… and then gives him away

Anita Tedaldi is a cruel, horrible woman. How can one say this?

Well, let’s just start at the beginning. In January of 2008, she wrote an article for Military.com that has since been removed from their website titled “We Can’t Trade In Our Children or Husbands”. China Adoption Talk got an excerpt, though:

Hard to believe, but a Dutch couple returned their adopted Korean daughter after seven years. [I blogged about this case here]. The parents adopted the little girl from South Korea when she was 4 months old. Reports of how the situation unfolded were contradictory but it appears that the girl was given over to the care of the Social Welfare Department in Hong Kong, where the man is a diplomat, because they could no longer care for her. The couple explained that the girl was emotionally unresponsive and all attempts at therapy failed.

As an adoptive parent, really as just a parent, I can’t justify this couple’s behavior under any circumstance. I don’t think these people are monsters, though the result of their action is monstrous because they chose to follow their selfish and unloving side instead of choosing to tough it out and love their daughter no matter what. Sadly, the impact on this child will be devastating.

Perhaps they had good intentions when they adopted, most likely they did, but something went wrong along the way. These parents were probably unprepared to deal with some difficult aspects of adoption. It’s easy to imagine only the best of a new family member, just as we do with our biological children. No one envisions mediocrity, let alone problems. I have imagined perfect things in the past only to discover the road to family or marital bliss requires lots of hard work and an effort to practice unconditional love.

… From personal experience I can say that adoption can be challenging. But so can a biological child who has issues, or problems in marriage, or work-related difficulties. When our adopted son Matteo started having health issues we had to consult several specialist and it was hard for him to be around his sisters, it became challenging. This doesn’t mean that my husband or I ever had any second thoughts about adopting Matteo, or that we considered him any different than our biological children.

Now, who can guess how Anita Tedaldi’s own adoption turned out? You guessed it: she adopted a baby boy and then, eighteen months later, gave him away.

D. was my adopted son. He’s a little boy from South America who came to our home several months before that frightening night. He arrived through Miami International Airport on a Monday afternoon, and I was so anxious that on my six-hour drive to pick him up, I dug my nails into the steering wheel for the duration of the trip, leaving marks I can still see today. I couldn’t contain my excitement. After waiting many long months, I’d finally hold and kiss my son.

His social worker, his pediatrician and his neurologist all told me that he had come a long way, and that attachment issues were to be expected with adoption. But D.’s attachment problems were only half the story. I also knew that I had issues bonding with him. I was attentive, and I provided D. with a good home, but I wasn’t connecting with him on the visceral level I experienced with my biological daughters. And while it was easy, and reassuring, to talk to all these experts about D.’s issues, it was terrifying to look at my own. I had never once considered the possibility that I’d view an adopted child differently than my biological children. The realization that I didn’t feel for D. the same way I felt for my own flesh and blood shook the foundations of who I thought I was.

I sought help and did some attachment therapy, which consisted of exercises to strengthen our relationship, mostly games because of D.’s age. He fell in my arms many times throughout the day, we sang songs, read books, repeated words while we made eye contact. We built castles and block towers and went to a mommy and me class.

None of that was enough, of course, and Anita decided to simply abandon her son.

As I wrestled with these demons, things remained very tense in my home; whenever my husband was stateside we fought incessantly. I felt I was swimming upstream until one early morning Jennifer called, and told me that she had found a great family for D. They had seen his pictures, learned about his situation, and fallen in love with him. The mom, Samantha, was a psychologist, and the family had adopted another boy with similar issues just a couple of years before.

I spoke to Samantha and her husband a few times on the phone and right off the bat I felt comfortable with them. During one of our conversations we decided that she’d come down to meet D. by herself, to ease the transition.

This meant that the decision was final. D. would be leaving my home.

As she said herself — she followed her selfish and unloving side rather than choosing to tough it out and love her son regardless of the circumstances. Did she honestly have no idea that, hey, maybe the first few years might be tough, especially for a baby who was found abandoned on the side of the road? A child who was neglected is not going to automatically be a bright, happy, bubbly baby who will just attach himself to the first person who calls herself Mommy. And she just went and exacerbated his attachment anxieties by abandoning him, too.

Honestly, she probably should have given him away because frankly, she’s a terrible mother who never deserved him. I’m curious: would she give away one of her biological children just because they weren’t attaching to her in the way that she expected? Children are not robots. They don’t respond how you want them to respond. They don’t come without their share of problems or issues, and I just can’t imagine how a parent could choose to just give up on one of their children, especially when they went through so much effort to get their child. She condemns the other couple for giving up their child, saying it would have a “devastating impact”, but apparently that didn’t matter to her with “D.”.

“D.” deserved a real family, one that wouldn’t view him as disposable and throw him away if things didn’t turn out exactly the way they wanted them too. I hope he’s found it with his new family.

tdy_lauer_adoption_091001_300w

Written by

11 Comments
  • Melinda P says:

    As aweful as that is, it’s the way our society has turned out. People abandon things because they require work to get through. For example, look at the divorce rate today. It’s alarming! People are divorcing one another because “I don’t love you anymore”. What happened was things got rough, and they don’t know how to deal with that. (I’m not saying all divorces are caused by this, there are some where the marriage must be dissolved. Spousal abuse and an affair are about the only reasons though.) If people feel that marriage is “disposable”, why not children too! It sickens me! That’s why some people shouldn’t be allowed to adopt or have children of their own!

  • I just threw up. No joke I ran to the restroom and puked out my breakfest.

  • I just threw up. No joke I ran to the restroom and puked out my breakfest.

  • Charity says:

    I don’t think she is a horrible person. It sounds like the child is doing much better in his new home and is bonding with his new family much better.

    The new mom said he “can’t get enough of his brother or his dad’s attention.” He did not bond with the other adoptive father, who was often gone, and the sisters were indifferent toward him.

    The new family has experience with a child like him and unconditionally love them both. He is obviously better off.

    She sincerely struggled with this decision. To have kept him and denied him the opportunity to have a better life would have been selfish. Instead, she faced her shortcomings and failures to do what would be better for him. Even if she did it because she thought it was the easier thing – though I doubt it was easy- he is still better off.

  • Mat says:

    Yeah,

    I’m sure she’ll be a true feminist “heroine” for making the brave choice against the “evil patriarchy.” Oops, Charity already beat me to it by taking the feminist position…

    Hey Charity, it’s called responsibility for your actions which this woman clearly neglected (particularly after she adopted one). Although yes, this kid is probably better off somewhere else. “D” just got lucky. Many kids have to deal with stupid and narcissistic parents.

    Personally, I think this woman should be sterilized so she can’t have kids. Oh my, my “patriarchal” ideas came out again. My bad…

  • BobV says:

    Not that adopting is the equivalent to getting a pet but this reminds me somewhat of the people who get a dog, have it for a few years, then when they move or decide they don’t want it anymore take it to the vet and have it put down. Not because it was sick or dangerous, but because it became an inconvenience.

    Yes, I’ve known people who do that. Not friends obviously.

    If you aren’t prepared for the responsibility, including the difficult parts, then don’t take it upon yourself. Period, end of story.

    Getting traded out certainly won’t help his bonding issues.

    Poor kid.

  • Charity says:

    Yeah, I know nothing about responsibility for my actions. And I sure as hell have no idea how hard it is to raise a child with severe emotional problems. Oh wait. Yeah, I do. I also know that without the very strong love I have for that child – as his biological mother – there is no way I would be able to give him the support and unconditional love he needs to deal with his challenges.

    A child like that deserves a family that wants him and loves him unconditionally and is equipped to help him.

    As a side, no I am not a feminist. I am a hard-core conservative, homeschooling, stay-at-home mom. Interestingly enough, I was also a conservative blogger for three years, until closed-minded people like you, who cannot bear to process a different point of view, kind of got on my nerves and I had to stop for the sake of my sanity.

  • Sarah says:

    Ugh. What I hate most about these people is that I work with kids who are seriously fucked up because of abandonment issues. Do these adults seriously not realize that they are dealing with people, not stuffed animals. I hope the children who were abandoned have good, loving homes now, they deserve it.

  • Mat says:

    “Yeah, I know nothing about responsibility for my actions. And I sure as hell have no idea how hard it is to raise a child with severe emotional problems. Oh wait. Yeah, I do.”

    Well, good, though I do have to say that you pretty much gave a free pass to that adoptive “mother”, so your statement was a tad puzzling, you know?

    “I also know that without the very strong love I have for that child – as his biological mother – there is no way I would be able to give him the support and unconditional love he needs to deal with his challenges.”

    Exactly! So once again, how can you just give a free pass to this mother who just dumped the kid on someone else? That’s what I meant by responsibility. This wasn’t a woman who had an accidental birth (which is bad enough). This was someone who voluntarily ADOPTED another kid (meaning this was purely optional) and then decided that she just didn’t feel like raising him because it was just too darned tough. Well, you know what I say to that? She wanted the kid, she should raise him (particularly since she freaking adopted him in the first place!). Melinda, Sarah and BobV made fantastic points regarding this, so I won’t regurgitate it.

    “A child like that deserves a family that wants him and loves him unconditionally and is equipped to help him.”

    Ok, but that woman should have thought of this before she actually, you know, adopted the kid? I have an adopted brother (from Korea), so I have a pretty good grasp on what it takes to adopt a kid in this country. It ain’t exactly easy and the parents are (well usually) very sure they want to go through with it.

    “As a side, no I am not a feminist. I am a hard-core conservative, homeschooling, stay-at-home mom.”

    Good for you. However, your point was pretty much straight out of the feminist playbook.

    “Interestingly enough, I was also a conservative blogger for three years, until closed-minded people like you, who cannot bear to process a different point of view, kind of got on my nerves and I had to stop for the sake of my sanity.”

    Yeah, those rational, logical “close-minded” people like myself are a bunch of big conservative meanies. To set the record straight, I used to be pretty liberal when I was younger, but then I grew up so I’m well aware of many “different viewpoints.” However, I think most viewpoints other than purely conservative are pretty dumb and based on emotions and silliness rather than on cold, hard facts (and trust me, I came across some doozy thoughts when I was a liberal). Therefore, making the kind of “you’re just narrow-minded” statement you just made isn’t going to faze me much. Been there, done that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead