First of all, when the New York Times claims that Kamala Harris has a “nuanced” record when it comes to the border issues, you have to take a moment to consider their claim. Should you hand the reporters responsible for the article a copy of Webster’s Dictionary or the Oxford English Dictionary? Or maybe the definition of nuanced changed in the last four years from “having or characterized by subtle and often appealingly complex qualities, aspects, or distinctions” to “made up out of thin air”. Of course, this is the Times, so the smokescreen probably shouldn’t surprise anyone. But what’s the truth? has she been as bad as Donald Trump alleges or have her actions been nuanced and more successful than even members of her own party expected?