Previous post
It was a masterful troll. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Judge Ana Reyes that, since she’s now an expert in military planning, perhaps she should report to Fort Benning to train his troops. A simple but effective pushback—let’s hope the message landed.
Since “Judge” Reyes is now a top military planner, she/they can report to Fort Benning at 0600 to instruct our Army Rangers on how to execute High Value Target Raids…after that, Commander Reyes can dispatch to Fort Bragg to train our Green Berets on counterinsurgency warfare. https://t.co/CNrl252Irs
— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) March 22, 2025
Joe Biden made history with judicial appointments, securing 235 federal judge confirmations in his first term—beating Donald Trump’s 226. Biden’s picks included a significant number of district court judges, reflecting his administration’s aggressive push for diversity and representation on the bench.
So here we sit, batting activists who sit on the bench.
U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., issued a preliminary injunction last week blocking the Pentagon from enforcing President Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender people from serving in the military.
Trump’s Jan. 27 order said “expressing a false ‘gender identity’ divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service” and instructed the Department of Defense to update its medical standards for military service and pronoun policies. – Fox News
Who exactly is Judge Ana Reyes? She’s a prime example of why identity politics and activism have no place in the judiciary. So much for Lady Justice being blindfolded.
Born in Uruguay, Reyes is now a lawyer and judge in the United States. Naturally, she was appointed by Joe Biden—likely more for her identity checkboxes than her qualifications. She’s a woman, a lesbian, and Latina—DEI at its peak. No surprise there, considering Biden has appointed more federal judges in his first two years than any president since JFK, with identity seemingly trumping merit.
Judge Ana Reyes moved to the United States in the first grade without knowing a word of English. She lived the American dream, rising through the ranks to become a federal judge. Now, thanks to Joe Biden, she’s using her position to push transgender activism from the bench.
I’m about to say something that will probably ruffle some feathers—at least on the left. I don’t want women in combat. Can they serve in the military? Absolutely—as administrative support. I served in the Navy myself, stationed in Washington, D.C., in a support role. But when it comes to the mentally confused—men who think they’re women, women who think they’re men, and those willing to mutilate their own bodies to prove it—they have no business anywhere near the military. My motto? Make asylums great again.
But that’s just me—just a regular citizen with no political power, no seat at the table, just common sense and a keyboard.
If we’re forced to bow to activist judges and their social experiments, then at the very least, let’s keep these confused souls out of roles where life and death hang in the balance. Put them somewhere quiet, where they won’t disrupt operations or compromise the integrity of high-stakes jobs. Keep them away from combat, law enforcement, and anything requiring split-second decisions under pressure. Give them a desk, a paperwork shuffle, and a job far removed from the front lines—because the real world doesn’t have a “safe space” button.
Feature Image:U.S. Secretary of Defense, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
John Shepherd says: Maybe the SECDEF should have asked her if she would have sex with an intact man claiming to be a woman.
Scott says: She might, but looking at that ugly mug, it’d have to be a trannie with VERY low self esteem to have sex with her..
John Shepherd says: I know from experience whenI ask pro-trans that question I get mumbles or an outright no.
GWB says: Carol, the real problem here is that Trump is the Commander-in-Chief, and the judiciary has no authority over that. PERIOD. Except in places where a decision conflicts with the powers distributed in the Constitution (such as the ability to declare war), actual violation of enumerated rights (funny she has no problem with Bush’s EO banning carry of personal weapons on military bases), or places where Congress has legitimately intruded via legislation (there is none forcing the Executive to admit transgenders into the military – because the legislature knows it would get them all fired at the next election).
Hegseth isn’t saying “Oh, you’re so knowledgeable about the military.” He’s saying “You must be knowledgeable about the military, so you should join it.” And he implies she would then have jurisdiction.
The issues you speak about, Carol, have mostly been answered by Congress. Therefore, a judge could find the Commander-in-Chief in violation at some point. But this issue is purely one of administrative decision, and is therefore out of the purview of the judge in any and every way.
Edward W says: One of Trump’s great failings when he lost the election in 2020 was the failure to get with Mitch McConnell and fill every vacant federal judgeship before he left office. Had he done that he would be facing a lot less lawfare.
bert33 says: 15-miler with a 50-pound pack and 3 ranges on the same day that’ll shut her up talking about the military. Skip these idiot judiciary people, know-nothing office pukes. Joe’s pack is plenty heavy enough without being stuffed full of this political crap.
6 Comments