Previous post

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Strikes Again

Next post

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Strikes Again

The infamous 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has made yet another controversial decision, with Justice Sandra Day O’Connor sitting in. This time, they overturned Arizona’s requirement that voters show proof of citizenship before voting.

Hey, we gotta make voting easier for those illegal aliens somehow!

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned Arizona’s requirement that people show proof of citizenship to register to vote.

The split decision by a three-judge panel determined that the requirement to show proof of citizenship — passed by voters in 2004 — is not consistent with the National Voter Registration Act.

Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, temporarily sitting by designation, and Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta, with chief judge Alex Kozinski dissenting, said Prop. 200 creates an additional hurdle, while the national act is intended to reduce “state-imposed obstacles” to registration.

The majority noted that Congress was well aware of the problem of voter fraud when it passed the voter act, and built in sufficient protections, including applying perjury penalties to applicants who lie about their eligibilty.

Yeah, there’s all this voter fraud and stuff, and voters already decided that this was what they wanted, but we’ll just overturn it anyways! Heck, why should only US citizens get to vote? Illegal alien votes would bring in so many more votes for Democrats, after all.

As Michelle Malkin points out, the Obama Department of Social Justice has been trying to keep states from ensuring that only US citizens vote in our elections. But this is a whole new degree of insanity. What we have here is judges that used the bench to endorse and facilitate voter fraud. It’s absolutely outrageous — and unfortunately, not surprising in the least.

Written by

4 Comments
  • Steve says:

    Someone answer this question for me…

    Yesterday I voted in the state of Texas. When they started the machine for me, there was an option for Spanish.

    Isn’t it a requirement for citizenship to have a working knowledge of English? If not, why not?

  • kirroth says:

    “Isn’t it a requirement for citizenship to have a working knowledge of English? If not, why not?”

    No, that’d be raaacciiist. 😉

    I don’t remember noticing that (I live in TX too), but I may have overlooked it.

  • POWinCA says:

    I just posted about how easy it is to register to vote in California, illegally.

    It is a travesty of democracy that a law intended to eliminate obvious attempts to keep blacks from voting would become unrestricted to the ballot box by foreigners and other people ineligible to vote.

    All they must do is swear they are eligible to vote.

    The next time I break the law, my defense will be “I swear I didn’t do it.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead