Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the law. Specifically they decided that the travel ban, which we’ve written about often, instituted by President Trump can move forward. Via Legal Insurrection:
The Supreme Court will allow President Trump’s Third Travel Ord to take full effect, the Justices ruled in two Orders Monday afternoon staying lower court rulings enjoining the Travel Order
President Trump’s Third Travel Order restricted entry of nationals from Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Chad, Somalia, North Korea and Venezuela.
Lower court rulings, specifically those from radical judges from Maryland and Hawaii, were stayed. You can read them here and here.
Interestingly, although Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor ruled against; Justices Breyer and Kagan (an Obama appointee!) joined the other five in ruling in favor of the Trump Administration.
BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds and recognizes Trump’s constitutional authority to restrict travel to United States from high-risk countries [8 USC 1182(f)] and allows executive order aimed at curbing terrorism to take full effect. @realDonaldTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr pic.twitter.com/Ol9IgVg8nt
— Andrew H. Scott (@CommissionerKY) December 4, 2017
Ok, I laughed out loud at this one:
The Supreme Court agrees with Trump's #TravelBan
Guess which Obama hold over judge is going to be cranky pants?
That's right. Judge Derrick Watson. pic.twitter.com/qjk8ReEfvi
— Mike (@Fuctupmind) December 4, 2017
And of course, the wailing and gnashing of teeth began in about .00045 seconds after the news broke.
And it begins…stacking our court system is dangerous.
— Susie Casanova (@CasanovaSusie) December 4, 2017
Huh?? Exactly ONE justice has been appointed to the Supreme Court thus far. If that’s stacking, someone needs to review the definition of ‘stacking.’
Correction @cnnbrk: The Supreme Court allows President Donald Trump’s #discriminating travel ban based on religion to take effect while legal challenges continue. #fixeditforyou https://t.co/qxqdwkvEPQ
— Aaron Gill (@agillatc) December 4, 2017
Yeah…this poor poor guy just doesn’t understand the difference between Muslim, Islam, and terrorism. So SAD!
Divided Supreme Court allows the full enforcement of Trump's travel ban affecting residents of six mostly Muslim countries https://t.co/BDAYGn4JBs pic.twitter.com/cw9C8rx8Pz
— New York Daily News (@NYDailyNews) December 4, 2017
Divided?? Since WHEN is a decision of 7-2 divisive?? Oh wait, that’s because the decision went FOR Trump instead of against him. Wanna bet it would’ve been a very different headline if decision had been reversed?
Oh goody! There’s a hashtag!
This is a disgrace to our nation. #NoMuslimBanEver https://t.co/pOhjHVrkb1
— Michael Skolnik (@MichaelSkolnik) December 4, 2017
Oh?
Yet a good thing. Are you ready for women to be oppressed, gays to be murdered. Liberals fight for social justice but a Muslim culture would silence all of those beliefs yet SJW's alike complain about immigration and open borders. How can you say this is a bad idea?
— Ethan Taylor (@EthanTa53029495) December 4, 2017
Really good question!
The harpies over at Women’s March won’t say a word about Kate Steinle …but they are all over this like fat kids on cake!
SCOTUS turned its back on our Muslim communities today.
It’s up to us to stay loud. It’s up to us to keep fighting back against Trump’s Islamophobia. It’s up to us to keep fighting back against Trump’s white supremacy.#NoMuslimBanEVER https://t.co/0rvIwKO5A9
— Women's March (@womensmarch) December 4, 2017
This is rich coming from the one who called for jihad against the U.S…
In light of #MuslimBan announcement: if you are traveling to JFK, call (844)326-4940 and/or email JFKNeedALawyer@gmail.com for legal consultation and support. #NoMuslimBanEver
— Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour) December 4, 2017
Haha!
To report suspected islamic terrorism go to this link https://t.co/aWZ2omsjJU
— Tomas (@Tomasg628) December 4, 2017
Yep, good ole Linda has all the usual Leftist talking points down cold.
Here we go. White supremacist agenda continues. #NoMuslimBanEver https://t.co/QuJCP5BGkb
— Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour) December 4, 2017
She’s so CUTE!!! Yeah. No.
Meanwhile, let’s keep things real guys. This is a TRAVEL BAN from countries where there is literally little to ZERO vetting processes in place. But yeah, let’s try to compare apples to oranges to limes shall we?
Dear America,
Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.
Do you know what else was legal?– Slavery
– Jim Crow
– Japanese Internment#NoMuslimBanEver— Simran Jeet Singh (@SikhProf) December 4, 2017
Keep in mind, this was the second case before the Supreme Court.
Now, does this mean the travel ban stay just issued by the Court today will hold, even though there are cases in the lower courts still pending? Actually it is highly possible.
This only allows the ban to go into effect pending further proceedings. But such rulings are not usually followed by a finding on the merits that reverses them. Looks like Trump will win on this and should be a deserved rebuke to certain lower courts. https://t.co/ptLqWCYgUm
— Brit Hume (@brithume) December 4, 2017
In other words, activist judges take note. When the law is applied your activist political rulings will usually get thrown out. Perhaps this is the reminder that those judges needed. Rule on the LAW, not on your political leanings.
Will the left learn that lesson? Yeah. No. The oh so cute #NoMuslimBanEver hashtag on Twitter shows us that the meltdowns and temper tantrums is their response to the Supreme Court’s massive reality check today.
Winning.
‘Nuff said.
Agreed. The meltdowns will be something to watch for sure!
Not sure I agree with you Nina…”the left looses it’s mind”?… wouldn’t that imply that they had a mind to begin with??
Hahaha! Few others have pointed that out … The post title would’ve been too long if I’d said, the left loses the last bits of it’s mind… LOL
“its”, not “it’s”
I used the singular possessive it’s because well… the left pretty much operates with one hive mind. 😉
Nevertheless, FYI, the singular possessive is spelled without an apostrophe. “It’s” means “it is” and nothing else.
Bravo
Naahhh! Still wouldn’t work; can’t lose what you never had.
Scott has it correct, leftists are devoid of common sense, clueless about history, and in denial about human nature. That is why they are dangerous and why the blood of hundreds of millions stain the grubby, insane hands.
I think it’s great on its merits.
But as a Canadian all I can say is oh shit here they come.
oooh, and i forgot, as far as that liar and sharia advocate sarsour, the only thing i can think t say about her is a phrase that ends in “and the horse(or should it be camel?) she rode in on!!!”
The obot HI judge will be back in a few days with a new bogus injunction.
Dear America,
Just because something is legal doesn’t make it right.
Do you know what else was legal?
– Slavery
– Jim Crow
– Japanese Internment#NoMuslimBanEver
— Simran Jeet Singh (@SikhProf) December 4, 2017
Funny you should bring up three Democratic legacies.
Wait Alan, you’re bringing up facts, and ones that are not complimentary to demonrats (are there any that are???) that cannot be allowed, you’re ot listening to the message… pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…
So apparently Kagan cares about the law, where Ginsberg and Sotomayor care more about party? We knew Ginsberg was a tool of the party; we now know Sotomayor is too. Amazing how both will screw over their sex and faiths for their party.
Denton, everyone who’s been paying attention knows that Sotomayorrrrr is as leftist as you can get (that’s why obummer put her there)… the only surprise is that Kagan didn’t vote with the lefties
Specifically they decided that the travel ban, which we’ve written about often, instituted by President Trump can move forward.
Actually, they told them they had already decided it could go into effect until oral arguments, and they should stop being political obstructionists when a superior court has already told you to SUAC.
Those people need to be sanctioned as vexatious litigants. It’s the same money fueling these suits.
19 Comments