LGBT Publication Calls Little Prince George a Gay Icon. He’s Only Four. [VIDEO]

LGBT Publication Calls Little Prince George a Gay Icon. He’s Only Four. [VIDEO]

LGBT Publication Calls Little Prince George a Gay Icon. He’s Only Four. [VIDEO]

I’m gonna come right out here and say this: calling a four-year-old boy a “gay icon” is a special kind of sick.

Who does this?

Well, of course, it’s the gay activist community. And the little boy they’re slobbering over? He’s little Prince George of the British royal family. You know, the cute little son of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, whom we better know as Prince William and Kate.

It all started when the royal family was in Germany last month. Little George climbed into the cockpit of a helicopter, and like many little boys he was thrilled. Moreover, it was kind of an early birthday present for him since he was about to turn four.

So here’s the photograph that so excited some really sick people on the LGBT site PinkNews:

The adorable little boy led PinkNews writer Josh Jackman to write this sick tripe:

“Prince George has become a gay icon overnight. The monarch-to-be has always been cute and well-dressed, but one day before his fourth birthday, a photo of him excitedly holding his face changed everything.”

Oh, it gets worse.

Click to enlarge.

And then there’s this, from a ‘HuffPostQueer’ writer:

One Northern Irish politician, Jim Allister, is disgusted, and rightfully so:

‘Sexualising a young child in this fashion is entirely inappropriate. In reality, the photo which prompted the piece shows a four-year-old boy who is smartly dressed and excited about being on a helicopter with his male father and female mother. To take an image of a little boy and to fantasise of him being an icon for a life defined by sex is outrageous and sick.’

But PinkNews defends its writing, saying that while little George is not necessarily gay, but is an advocate for gays. Or some such rot:

“There are of course those who say that any discussion of the prince’s sexuality is premature, but this isn’t about his sexuality. As Madonna, Lady Gaga, the Babadook and yes, even Ariana Grande have shown, you don’t have to be gay or even have a defined sexuality to be an LGBT icon. Kids are born with a sexuality, and should be encouraged to find it without it being assumed that they’re straight.”

This is no longer about a beleaguered community gaining rights. It’s not about equality. This is about destruction of traditional mores and about pushing gay sexual practices into the public square. Even if it means turning an innocent little boy into some sort of sick sex object.

Stop pissing on my foot and telling me that it’s raining, m’kay?

Written by

Kim is a pint-sized patriot who packs some big contradictions. She is a Baby Boomer who never became a hippie, an active Republican who first registered as a Democrat (okay, it was to help a sorority sister's father in his run for sheriff), and a devout Lutheran who practices yoga. Growing up in small-town Indiana, now living in the Kansas City metro, Kim is a conservative Midwestern gal whose heart is also in the Seattle area, where her eldest daughter, son-in-law, and grandson live. Kim is a working speech pathologist who left school system employment behind to subcontract to an agency, and has never looked back. She describes her conservatism as falling in the mold of Russell Kirk's Ten Conservative Principles. Don't know what they are? Google them!

4 Comments
  • Scott says:

    “This is no longer about a beleaguered community gaining rights. It’s not about equality.”… Sorry to disagree Kim, but it was never about these things
    “This is about destruction of traditional mores and about pushing gay sexual practices into the public square. Even if it means turning an innocent little boy into some sort of sick sex object.”.. That’s what it’s been about since the beginning, sadly…

  • Kate says:

    Agenda.

  • parker says:

    These people deserve to be tarred and feathered and put in stocks on the public square. Don’t care what consenting adults do in private, just don’t want to hear about it. And when children are brought into their agenda… tar and feathers, and perhaps the occasional beat down.

  • Olivia says:

    You are overreacting. The websites never said that they wanted to date George or that George was sexy or something. They simply said that a picture of him looking especially happy made him look similar to members of the LGBTQ+ community. Being gay doesn’t mean you thrive on dirty sex, all it means that instead of loving the opposite gender, you love the same gender. You made it seem like they were child predators, and like most blog writers, your searching for something negative to say. Be positive, and your life will be great, I assure you that! 🙂
    (Also, @parker,) that’s very rude for you to make an active threat against gay people, what if somebody said that same thing to you just because you were a little different?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead