Sugar and Spice
Previous post

Federal Judge Orders Grand Jury Info On Hillary’s Emails Be Made Public [VIDEO]

Federal Judge Orders Grand Jury Info On Hillary’s Emails Be Made Public [VIDEO]

Federal Judge Orders Grand Jury Info On Hillary’s Emails Be Made Public [VIDEO]

Hillary Clinton is in the news again. I know, she’d really rather that other H called Harvey would dominate the news cycle 24/7 but ehhh… not going to happen.

So what’s the latest with her Hillaryness? Quite a few things as a matter of fact.

A. The email investigation that the FBI arbitrarily decided the public had lost interest in.

The head of the FBI Records Management Division wrote Ty Clevenger, a New York Attorney who filed the FOIA request in March 2016, to inform him that his request was being denied in late August.

“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” the letter, obtained by Fox News, reads. “Therefore, records regarding your subject are withheld pursuant to FOIA exemptions.”

Uh huh..RIGHT. How many times have we here at Victory Girls written about Hillary’s email issues and how important it is that they be made public? I’ve lost count. So don’t tell us that the public isn’t interested. WE ARE.

Not only that, but those in Congress as well as NY Attorney Ty Clevenger were equally flabbergasted by the FBI’s stance on this.

“I’m just stunned. This is exactly what I would have expected had Mrs. Clinton won the election, but she didn’t. It looks like the Obama Administration is still running the FBI,” Clevenger said Tuesday.

“How can a story receive national news coverage and not be a matter of public interest? If this is the new standard, then there’s no such thing as a public interest exception.”

Well, perhaps the public outcry bore fruit as the FBI in a late Thursday afternoon news dump put this out on the news wires:

U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the FBI to produce uncensored court documents describing the grand jury subpoenas issued to force Clinton’s internet service providers to turn over information related to her private server use, according to a statement released by Cause of Action Institute.

Understandably Cause of Action’s President was a fan of the decision.

B. However, we would be remiss if we didn’t note that the Fix Was In from the very beginning. This from Townhall’s Katie Pavlich explains why:

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.  That was long before FBI agents finished their work.

Exactly when did Comey change his tune publicly? Ummm…yeah. I happened to write about all of this a year ago. Little did I or anyone else know that Hillary’s ‘get out of jail free card’ had been set several months before.

That said, no matter how many times she clicks her heels and no matter how many threats she makes, the fact is Hillary Clinton needs to answer for her actions regarding her work, her emails, and more.

Yeah. No. Hillary, quit while you are behind. You cannot wipe all this out with a cloth or something. You made some drastic mistakes that honestly laid us wide open for major national security issues.

No honey, you can’t wipe those emails with a cloth.

Former FBI Director James Comey’s actions MONTHS prior to their interview with Hillary, Huma, and Cheryl Mills among others certainly didn’t help.

The FIX was in. The FIX was in in order to get Hillary elected. And boy howdy did everyone in the DC and Democrat party political establishment TOTALLY miss the boat on the American mood.

I don’t know about you, but the stories that have surfaced the last couple of days regarding Hillary make it clear. She definitely wasn’t the right person for the job. And that’s A Good Thing.

Written by

7 Comments
  • GWB says:

    Forming conclusions before looking at evidence? Pfft, that’s what we call SCIENCE here on the left! It makes it muuuuch easier to concoct the evidence when you know the right conclusion to reach before you start. Otherwise we’d have to go with the facts or something. We can’t have that!
    /prog

    (BTW, Nina, you forgot a “B” when you changed topics. 😉 )

  • comradewhoopie says:

    I’m a member of the public and I’m interested. I suspect the next excuse the FBI will try is that by making the emails public it will disclose their technical methods at retrieving deleted data.

  • cathymv says:

    Public interest is now why the FBI investigates?

    So then, if the public doesn’t care or know that I committed a crime, then the FBI won’t investigate fully cause there is no public interest?? hmmmmmmmm…

    • GWB says:

      Nooooo. (Though I appreciate the snarkiness in that.)

      The concept is that the FBI can’t release investigative materials without significant public interest because there are things in that record that might slander a person, or cause them grief (for which they were NOT indicted). It’s a Fifth Amendment issue.
      There’s also the issue of personal information – it can be redacted, but that takes an effort.

      • TRX says:

        They could have said that, but they chose to blow the request off with a BS excuse instead.

        “We felt it was inappropriate to say ‘never in a million years you loser, neener neener’, but we hope you get the point.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead