#ConfederateFlag: Nikki Haley Did the Right Thing By Removing the Flag

#ConfederateFlag: Nikki Haley Did the Right Thing By Removing the Flag

South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley called today for the removal of the Confederate flag on the State House grounds in Columbia, five days after the racially-motivated killing of nine black church goers.

“It’s time to move the flag from the Capitol grounds,” she said. “We are not going to allow this symbol to divide us any longer.”

Haley
Credit: ksat.com

I applaud Governor Haley. She made a correct and moral decision. And she expressed herself with eloquence and diplomacy towards all South Carolinians.

https://youtu.be/msmy-KAD6S4?t=3m53s

I had written about this Sunday, and had expressed my opinion that the flag should be removed if desired by the people of South Carolina. At one time I would’ve been on the side of those who supported the flag, but when reading how in recent history it was resurrected as a symbol of Jim Crow, white supremacy, and segregation by Southern Democrats in the early ’60’s, I felt it had become too tainted to remain. How could I honor Dr. Martin Luther King’s legacy of judging people by their character rather than their skin color, and yet endorse this flag?

As a Christian, I am called by Christ to practice moral behavior, even if it is not to my advantage to do so. As a sinner, I fall short of that goal.

Doing the moral thing can be small, as when some Christmases ago a family member found he was undercharged by an inexperienced clerk. He contacted the store, and it cost him $150, but it was the right thing to do.

Doing the moral thing can cost lives and freedom. At the start of World War II in 1939, Dietrich Bonhoeffer returned to Germany from safety in New York City in order to resist the Nazi party and join a Jewish rescue action. He was hanged at Flossenburg prison by the Nazis in 1945. Likewise, Corrie ten Boom, her father, and her sister harbored Jews in their Dutch home; they were caught and imprisoned. Only Corrie survived. And then there was the late Miep Gies, who hid Anne Frank and her family in the “Secret Annexe” in Amsterdam, only to be discovered by Dutch police working with the occupying Germans.

Sarah Palin chose to give birth to a baby with Down Syndrome, despite the legal opportunity she had to abort her child. In the Sudan, Mariam Ibrahim was nearly executed by that country when she refused to recant her Christian faith.

And in Charleston, the family members of those massacred by the racist gunman forgave — forgave! — him for his crime against their loved ones. In the Christian faith, there is hardly a higher moral calling than to ask, “Father forgive them.”

If the flag had been long removed, would it have stopped this crime? No. With the flag gone, will racial tensions stop? No. It is symbolic at best. But in these times of Ferguson and Baltimore, it is one baby step towards easing and healing. It has to start somewhere. And it was the moral thing to do.

Written by

Kim is a pint-sized patriot who packs some big contradictions. She is a Baby Boomer who never became a hippie, an active Republican who first registered as a Democrat (okay, it was to help a sorority sister's father in his run for sheriff), and a devout Lutheran who practices yoga. Growing up in small-town Indiana, now living in the Kansas City metro, Kim is a conservative Midwestern gal whose heart is also in the Seattle area, where her eldest daughter, son-in-law, and grandson live. Kim is a working speech pathologist who left school system employment behind to subcontract to an agency, and has never looked back. She describes her conservatism as falling in the mold of Russell Kirk's Ten Conservative Principles. Don't know what they are? Google them!

11 Comments
  • Penny says:

    Kim, it is the “battle banner” of the Confederate army…so, yes, it has been used at those “The South shall rise again!” moments. And, THAT is why it should be in a museum somewhere. It neither causes nor defeats racism, it’s how people use it to muster people to “the cause”, which is that “The South shall rise again!” mentality.

  • F.D.R. in Hell says:

    Where will this end? What if the Stars & Stripes offends Moslems?

    • Kim Quade says:

      Not an equal scenario. The U.S. flag is an official symbol of the nation. If a Muslim is offended by the symbol of what I would assume is his nation, too bad. I’m sure you could find some ACLU attorney to take up his complaint, but I don’t think it would get far.
      The Confederate flag, on the other hand, is not the official symbol of South Carolina. The state flag features a white palmetto tree and crescent on a blue field, It’s based on Revolutionary War imagery, and has nothing to do with the Civil War.

      • F.D.R. in Hell says:

        Stop thinking rationally; the Libs don’t. 😉

        For example, explain the rationale behind schools forbidding American Flag apparel being worn on Cinco de Mayo.

        • Kim Quade says:

          Stupidity. And cowardice.
          The only possible logic (which usually is more like a lily-livered excuse) is that it will “disrupt” the classroom atmosphere.
          Read: the school administration doesn’t want to handle Mexican kids who might assault Anglo kids who sport the shirt.

          • F.D.R. in Hell says:

            Kim, you see where this “peace at any price” leads.

            To avoid provoking beheadings and/or urban riots, America will eventually give in and allow itself to be destroyed (if it hasn’t surrendered already).

            Sad. Very.sad.

            • Kim Quade says:

              But if we live in fear of that slippery slope on the other side, we will never get atop that mountain. . .

              I would apply the words of Jesus in Matthew 10:16.
              “Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.”

  • Ponder this disturbing fact for a moment: the GOP is working harder to eliminate the Stars and Bars than it is to repeal ObamaCare.

  • I concur that IF South Carolinians want the flag removed, it should be done. I believe that those in favor of removal should get a proposition (or whatever that state calls proposed legislation) put on the ballot in the next election and let South Carolinians decide for themselves. Should they then relocate the entire Civil War memorial off of the State House grounds? That piece of history might give somebody a boo-boo on their psyche too. Murky waters there…

    • Kim Quade says:

      I’m no Southerner, and have absolutely no relationship to Southern heritage whatsoever.
      Saying that, I would like to see the Memorial stay on the grounds, and for the following reasons:
      — The state house grounds belong to the people of SC, and the memorial commemorates those SC citizens who fought for the state. Many of today’s citizens are descendants of those men; they should have their ancestors honored on those grounds as well.
      — The memorial commemorates a part of SC history.
      — SC taxpayers fund that memorial.
      — The memorial is not representative of Jim Crow and the segregation movement of the mid-20th century. The flag was resurrected then to oppose civil rights.
      — I’m not sure, but I think that’s not even the specific battle flag for SC. That should be the flag to fly over the memorial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Become a Victory Girl!

Are you interested in writing for Victory Girls? If you’d like to blog about politics and current events from a conservative POV, send us a writing sample here.
Ava Gardner
gisonboat
rovin_readhead